D
DavidFilmer
Guest
Most of us know must never acknowledge or discuss anything he learned in Confession, even to the penitent. If the penitent brings something up, the priest must disavow all knowledge.
But what if it is within the context of a subsequent Confession? If the person says, “At my last Confession, I told you about such-and-such, and you told me this-and-that.” Suppose the person had misheard or misconstrued what Father had actually said - is the priest allowed to correct the misunderstanding?
Obviously he could not do so outside of the Confessional, but what about within the bounds of Confession?
I realize the priest could probably get around having to acknowledge the previous Confession with a bit of fancy footwork (“If you had said something like that, I think that I would have said…”), but I am asking if the priest would break the Seal if he acknowledged the prior Confession.
But what if it is within the context of a subsequent Confession? If the person says, “At my last Confession, I told you about such-and-such, and you told me this-and-that.” Suppose the person had misheard or misconstrued what Father had actually said - is the priest allowed to correct the misunderstanding?
Obviously he could not do so outside of the Confessional, but what about within the bounds of Confession?
I realize the priest could probably get around having to acknowledge the previous Confession with a bit of fancy footwork (“If you had said something like that, I think that I would have said…”), but I am asking if the priest would break the Seal if he acknowledged the prior Confession.