L
Lepanto
Guest
If so, what do you think about it?
Here is one I saw at a parish in Rosemont, IL. To be honest it reminds me of a football referee calling first down and it totally obfuscates the message of the crucifixion.
For the record, GIRM article 308 says:
“There is also to be a cross, with the figure of Christ crucified upon it, either on the altar or near it, where it is clearly visible to the assembled congregation. It is appropriate that such a cross, which calls to mind for the faithful the saving Passion of the Lord, remain near the altar even outside of liturgical celebrations.”
A processional cross with a corpus might technically meet the requirements of the GIRM in lieu of a permanently affixed crucifix, but perhaps not its spirit since it is would not be permanently kept in the sanctuary. And a processional cross without a corpus certainly would not compensate for the shortcomings of a permanently affixed resurrectifix.
Here is one I saw at a parish in Rosemont, IL. To be honest it reminds me of a football referee calling first down and it totally obfuscates the message of the crucifixion.
For the record, GIRM article 308 says:
“There is also to be a cross, with the figure of Christ crucified upon it, either on the altar or near it, where it is clearly visible to the assembled congregation. It is appropriate that such a cross, which calls to mind for the faithful the saving Passion of the Lord, remain near the altar even outside of liturgical celebrations.”
A processional cross with a corpus might technically meet the requirements of the GIRM in lieu of a permanently affixed crucifix, but perhaps not its spirit since it is would not be permanently kept in the sanctuary. And a processional cross without a corpus certainly would not compensate for the shortcomings of a permanently affixed resurrectifix.