Doesn't the last verse of 2 Maccabees make it seem non inspired?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jas84173
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

jas84173

Guest
The verse I refer to is
2 Maccabees 15:38: If it is well told and to the point, that is what I myself desired; if it is poorly done and mediocre, that was the best I could do.

I don’t know I just finished the book and it really doesn’t seem like scripture but more of a clumsy attempt at writing to the Jews in Egypt of the events described in 1 Maccabees.
 
I mean I think this happens in other parts of Scripture as well. Call it humbleness on behalf of the writers.
 
Ver. 38. So. Read 1 Machabees viii. 1., where more on this subject is written. After other persecutors were overcome, the land was at rest, and the author adds this general conclusion. (Worthington)

Ver. 39. So. Greek, “If in a frugal and middling style, this is as well as I was able.” (Haydock) — Perfectly. This is not said with regard to the truth of the narration, but with regard to the style and manner of writing, which in the sacred penmen is not always the most accurate. See St. Paul, 2 Corinthians xi. 6. (Challoner) — The style was frequently left to their choice. (Haydock) — Inspiration did not exclude natural acquirements. (Calmet) — The author is not afraid of having said any thing erroneous, though he might be less polished, like St. Paul: imperitus sermone sed non scientia. But we, having now come to the end of the Old Testament, must crave pardon for any mistakes into which we may have fallen, in the execution of this work, which is dedicated to the English (Worthington) and to all his majesty’s Catholic subjects, for whose benefit chiefly and for the sake of religion it has been undertaken. The many things hard to be understood, [2 Peter iii. 16.] which we did not wish to pass over, have swelled this work to a larger volume than was at first intended; larger, perhaps, than the purses of the poor and middle ranks, in the late hard times, could bear. But now the prospect is more cheering; and it is hoped that this profusion on a subject of such vast importance will be pardoned, particularly as we had also to comply with the desires of the more affluent, who repeatedly requested that the notes might be rather “more ample.” As they that prepare a feast, and seek to satisfy the will of others, so we, for the sake of many, willingly undergo the labour, chap. ii. 28. The variety of matter and of style may well be compared to a mixture of wine and water, ver. 40. Yet our aim has not been merely to please, but rather to counteract the baneful influences of heresy and infidelity. Thomas Paine (Age of Reason, part 2nd) having touched upon a few difficulties in some of the books of Scripture, says exultingly: “I have gone through the Bible as a man would go through a wood, with an axe on his shoulders, and fell trees; here they lie, and the priests, if they can, may replant them. They may perhaps stick them in the ground, but they will never grow.” Yes, they will grow, and brave the fury of tempests, because they have been planted not by priest, but by the hand of God. The Scriptures and the Church will stand and support each other till time shall be no more. The true faith has been preserved from Adam through all succeeding generations, and antichrist himself will not be able to destroy it. My WORD shall not pass away, [Mark xiii. 31.] says our divine Master.
 
St. Paul’s letters are considered inspired Scripture, yet they often have the clear marks of just being his ‘personal letters’.
To the rest I say—I and not the Lord—that if any believer[a] has a wife who is an unbeliever, and she consents to live with him, he should not divorce her. (1 Cor. 7:12 NRSV).
St. Paul is interjecting his personal opinion…he even says its not coming from the Lord!
Scripture, like most of the Catholic faith, follows what I call the “incarnation principle”. There is both a divine and a human element to Scripture. The Holy Spirit inspired men…and their personalities as writers comes through.
 
Nobody else mentioned this, but this sort of thing is common among writers of the time. If you were not a famous person known for your authority, you modestly begged the indulgence of the reader at the beginning and/or end of your book. This tradition continued for a very long time. Think of Shakespeare’s Puck epilogue, at the end of A Midsummer Night’s Dream:

"If we shadows have offended,
Think but this, and all is mended—
That you have but slumbered here,
While these visions did appear.
And this weak and idle theme,
No more yielding but a dream.

“Gentles, do not reprehend.
If you pardon, we will mend.”

And there are a lot of the later books of Scripture that have similar modest comments or prefaces. It’s a style thing.

The fun thing about 2 Maccabees is that the sacred author is clearly an editor and summarizer of a known historian whose larger work has been lost, because he says so. But he took such care with his work (which he compares to painting a house and preparing a banquet for guests) that the Lord favored him with inspiration. It’s a really remarkable thing. (It also makes it Scriptural to say that editing isn’t easy, which is right up there with the other big Biblical writer quote, about “Of the making of books there is no end.” The Lord doesn’t sugarcoat the difficulties of inspired writing!)
 
How do we know what is scripture ? I mean i can read 3 Maccabees and feel the same. Actually there’s a whole treasure trove of extra canonical texts that purport to be that. Like why is 2 Maccabees scripture but not 3 and 4? Which is in the Orthodox Church I believe.
 
The Scriptures were given to the Church for her use. What we have in the Canon are the books we use in liturgies (Masses and the Office), and which the Church decided were inspired by the Holy Spirit.

Obviously the Greek Orthodox and the Ethiopian churches have slightly different ideas about what books were inspired (ie, they have a couple extra ones), but they still pretty much agree.

Actually, very few of the extra-canonical books claim to be Scripture. The rest just claim to be edifying books, or records of personal inspiration. Books that openly claim to be inspired Scripture are usually the ones which were written by kooks. Arrogant kooks.
 
Last edited:
Simply put, (and I don’t mean to be so forward), because the Church says so.
The very same Church established by Jesus Christ with a promise that Hell would never prevail against it.
The Church with the authority given to it by Jesus Christ to bind and loose on Earth and in Heaven/.
The very same Church that under the Guidance of The Holy Spirit compiled the inspired writings that would become The Bible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top