P
pnewton
Guest
Well, no, I guess that vegans and vegetarians just don’t have the same sense of humor as corpse eaters!!!
Well, no, I guess that vegans and vegetarians just don’t have the same sense of humor as corpse eaters!!!
Bacon adds a good flavor.On that note, I am off to cook the brussel sprouts and the lentils for my hubby’s dinner.
I mention St. Thomas because Pope John Paul II was brought up. If we are to look at the latters comment about animal souls, we can not do so without considering the originator of that thought, St. Thomas, whether we like him or not. He is actually one of my favorite, but that is because of the orderly way in which he thinks, not because of anything to do with this topic.St. Thomas Aquinas is my least favorite saint…Humans have immortal souls, animals have mortal souls, and plants have (I forget the term–maybe someone else can supply it) a general, mass type of soul/consciousness. (And if I’m wrong on the plant thing, you can shoot me–but I’ve gotta run without lookin’ that one up…) A kind of living energy…
I think PETA gets a bad reputation because the more extreme things they do get all the press. They do not hold to a Catholic distinction that allows people to benefit from animals. Instead, they tend to treat humans as just another animal, only more intelligent.I am **not **defending PETA, but pnewton, do you actually know anyone from the “PETA crowd”??? When people write about the PETA crowd it seems like stereotyping to me. No, I don’t agree with running around naked in Spain to bring attention to the sport of bullfighting, but bullfighting is a bad thing.
BTW pnewton: caught any squirrels lately???
Oh my… poor armadillos!Lately, armadillos have been turning up more than squirrels.
very well said.Distracted, I had to come back while the soup is on the stove.
What you are telling a fellow Catholic is very unkind.One can be fighting for more than one good cause.
The problem is that this particular thread is ABOUT ANIMALS
Start an anti abortion thread and I will meet you there, agreeing with you.
So will most likely the posters you are misrepresenting.
Love your neighbor and your enemy .It is a mandate for us Catholics.
I just read an article of his. He is a Jesuit priest. He and a few others became vegetarian when they were novices, initially as it was a way to feed more and for the environment and later because of the cruelty. I will try to find the link and post it.I read “Thanking the Monkey” by Karen Dawn. She is a secular activist from California. She distances herself from Peter Singer (and is not afraid to say why), but acknowledges the light that he has shed on the subject.
I think that I need to learn more about PETA, so that I can answer all the stuff that comes up in these threads. I prefer to spend my time with the Christian & Catholic organizations (like Catholic Concern for Animals). I do believe that PETA also promotes the works of a Catholic priest, Fr. John Dear. I have not read his work.
Newbie2: Do you know anything about him??? Fr. John Dear?
The civility of most of the posters is appreciated. I have to disagree about Peta, please see my response to Marfan.Let me also add that this is an excellent topic for moral theology. It shows how where a smaller disagreement on one point can result in a divergnce of actions elsewhere. I have to say that the vegitarians posting here are sure a lot different than the PETA crowd. The motives are pure and come from a basis in Catholic doctrine.
Most can even appreciate a good meat joke.
Baloney.This is such a horrific subject. In China they also skin cats and dogs ALIVE and use their fur.
It is a crime in the U.S. to kill a dog or a cat. Why do you think? These animals are our domesticated friends and companions. They are family members. They are not raised to be eaten. Why do people have to eat everything in sight? If you say hunger, there are alternatives to dogs and cats for heaven’s sake. I can’t believe I’m actually responding to this post; but I love animals and I can’t stand it when people don’t see how they are beloved creations of Our Lord.
I can NOT subscribe to this thread, by the way. Also, personally, I eat poultry and fish sometimes but the other critters I love too much.
p.s. Don’t forget to bring your pets to the blessing of the animals at your parish.![]()
Well then, you are performing a very important ecological function!!! You are like the turkey vulture!!! Turkey vultures greatly contribute to sanitation by cleaning up the remains of dead animals, which might otherwise cause disease in other animals. Vultures are able to digest virulent strains of bacteria without apparent harmful effects.The only squirrels I eat are those killed on the road. Lately, armadillos have been turning up more than squirrels.
I’m sure that dog and pork are unclean animals and God said that we are not to eat them?China’s Dog Meat Trade: tiny.cc/wgdQJ The meat you eat. Does the species of animal make a difference?
Aren’t you being rather harsh? I don’t think they really care whether the animal is dead before they start the process. I know about cats and dogs but if more than half dead, don’t think they can put up much of a fight.Baloney.
Let me tell you from 20+ years of experience, if a cat doesn’t want to be vaccinated, it’s darn near impossible to do it without sedation or anesthesia. Skin them alive? I don’t think so. Same with dogs.
Think about it. Get the grey matter working. Why would anyone attempt to skin an animal alive and risk life and limb when they could skin it when it’s dead?
And, it’s not a crime to kill a dog or cat in the USA. It is a crime if it’s someone else’s pet, in the sense of destroying someone else’s property, but as it stands now, pets are considered property.
But, let me ask this…can a person have a chicken as a pet? Of course. I have a client who tube-fed her sick pet chicken for TWO YEARS under my care. Extremely dedicated client.
People keep pet goats, sheep, cows and horses as pets too.
So the arbitrary nature of choosing which animals we keep as pets, IMHO, has nothing to do with the morality of whether or not we should eat them as food.
PETA is savvy about drawing attention to topics that would otherwise not get substantive press coverage.I think PETA gets a bad reputation because the more extreme things they do get all the press.
Is it a Catholic distinction that we are allowed to benefit from animals*** at all costs***??? We are also given the responsibility of stewardship, which means that we must carefully weigh and consider the benefits and detriments to both the animals and to humans, and we must also consider how our utilization of resources (both animal and non-animal) affects the planet as a whole, and affects resources for future generations.They do not hold to a Catholic distinction that allows people to benefit from animals.
Your statement here indicates to me that you feel that PETA does not acknowledge the special relationship that we humans have with God. Understandably, it is a secular organization. That is why I recommend that we Catholics, and other Christians do look to Catholic/Christian organizations and writings–and there*** are ***plenty of those.Instead, they tend to treat humans as just another animal, only more intelligent.
And what specifically flies in the face of Catholic teaching???Consider their tenets:
peta.org/
Animals Are Not Ours to Eat
Animals Are Not Ours to Wear
Animals Are Not Ours to Experiment On
Obviously this flies in the face of Catholic teaching.
That would be great. I have often heard his name mentioned (Fr. John Dear) but am unfamiliar with him. I believe he has an association with the PETA group.I just read an article of his. He is a Jesuit priest. He and a few others became vegetarian when they were novices, initially as it was a way to feed more and for the environment and later because of the cruelty. I will try to find the link and post it.
Dogs and cats are not wild animals, and were bred, and are domesticated to live with humans. All dogs are descendants of wolves, who are wild animals, and do belong in the wild. The Dalmation, the Scottish Terrier, the Labrador, etc., are “man-made” genetic tinkerings who have no wild populations. So I agree this comment is ill-thought and misguided (rubbish).Peta is not evil. One of its founders, I think, came up with “we must let all dogs and cats free into jungles and forests.” Really rubbish.
I agree with you. And there is no reason to go naked because there are many alternatives to fur!!! The ***“I’d rather go naked than wear fur” *** campaign draws attention to the issue, and PETA is good at drawing attention to issues that would othewrwise not get a lot of press. Some of their tactics can be offensive however, and again, that’s why I prefer the numerous Catholic and Christian organizations. I also think that Catholic and Christian organizations bring something to the table that a secular organization can not. I agree, PETA does not seem to be “evil,” but does leave something to be desired. The absence of God in the equation is what is missing. And again, if you look to the works of Rev. Andrew Linzey, Matthew Scully (Catholic), and Deborah Jones (Catholic) you will also add that missing Christian perspective.Some of its members may be a bit extreme but you find that in any group. They dont shun publicity but seek it for their cause. Some people dont like that like their “I’d rather go naked than wear fur” campaign. Well while I am against the use of fur, both animals and humans will be better off not seeing me naked.
I think that if you believe in anything strongly, you should go all out to support and promote it (short of violence).
It is abhorrent (to many of us) what other cultures do to our beloved dogs and cats, but is that any different than what ***we ***do to cows, pigs, and chickens???But we can’t go around eating up little poochies!![]()
I’ve never stroked a duck before but when I was in Africa I did stroke a crocodile!It is abhorrent (to many of us) what other cultures do to our beloved dogs and cats, but is that any different than what ***we ***do to cows, pigs, and chickens???
I once had the privilege of spending time with a pet duck. She was so funny. She would peck at people’s shoes for “treats” and she learned to walk on a leash (with a harness, not a collar). And she loved to take “baths” and enjoyed having her head and neck stroked.
Just wanted to give you the link to Father John Dear’s websiteIt is abhorrent (to many of us) what other cultures do to our beloved dogs and cats, but is that any different than what ***we ***do to cows, pigs, and chickens???
I once had the privilege of spending time with a pet duck. She was so funny. She would peck at people’s shoes for “treats” and she learned to walk on a leash (with a harness, not a collar). And she loved to take “baths” and enjoyed having her head and neck stroked.