S
Sir_Knight
Guest
Can someone define Dogma, Doctrine, Discipline and Practice? And how they relate to each other?
Dogmas and Doctrines are what we believe and what the Church teaches.Can someone define Dogma, Doctrine, Discipline and Practice? And how they relate to each other?
Ott is generally recognized as the be all and end all of theologians on this topic. His manual “Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma” is perhaps the best resource available on this subject as it compiles all of these things well with justification by the relevant sources.This is what I found. According to Lugwig Ott (whoever he might be): * **Dogma - **teachings left to us by the Apostles. Dogmas includes both Scripture and Sacred Tradition. It is infallible, and it cannot be altered, changed, added to, or subtracted from.
- **Doctrine - **This is a formally defined teaching which has been promulgated by an ecumenical council (like Nicaea or Trent) or declared an infallible teaching by a reigning Pontiff. Doctrine is also infallible, and also cannot be changed—but it likewise cannot contradict Scripture, Tradition, any previous infallible statement, or another doctrine. Examples include the Immaculate Conception and the Holy Trinity.
- **Discipline - **This is an explanation of some aspect of the Faith. It is not infallible, and can be changed, evolved, condemned, or abandoned. Examples of this are limbo and Mary as Co-Redemptrix.
- **Practice - **This is a rule established by the Church to help the believer walk the straight and narrow path; examples include clerical celibacy, not eating meat on Fridays during Lent, and fasting on Ash Wednesday and Good Friday.
- **Devotion - **The lowest level of Catholic belief; devotions are usually more or less up to the individual believer to practice or not. This category includes such things as the Rosary, First Friday devotions, first Saturday devotions, etc.
I clearly remember reading on this discussion board that church doctrine ARE infallible. Also, according to Fr. Hardon’s Pocket Dictionary, doctrines are defined as “Any truth taught by the Church as necessary for acceptance by the faithful. The truth may be either formally revealed (as the Real Presence), or a theological conclusion (as the canonization of a saint), or part of the natural law (as the sinfulness of contraception). In any case, what makes it doctrine is that the Church authority teaches that it is to be believed. This teaching may be done either solemnly in ex cathedra pronouncements or ordinarily in the perennial exercise of the Church’s magisterium or teaching authority.” – that also sounds different from the above definition. A truth taught by the church IMPLIES to me that it can NOT be changed, evolved, condemned, or abandonedDoctrine. Explanation of some aspect of the Faith. Not infallible, can be changed, evolved, condemned, abandoned.
Well that is not how the term “Discipline” is defined and used today.Thank you. Then I guess those definitions that I listed above are correct.
Was there a reference given? I have his books, but this doesn’t really “sound like” him - also, I think it’s a bit mixed up.This is what I found. According to Lugwig Ott (whoever he might be):