L
Luigi_Daniele
Guest
Non ordained friars were no longer allowed to vote or be elected to office
Non ordained friars were no longer allowed to vote or be elected to office
That’s no longer the case. Since 1970 there are many non ordained Franciscans who have been superiors and some superior generals too.
Praise God, fratello! I am so proud of you, amico mio! Well deserved. You are a breath of fresh air to the Order, and to the Church as a whole.That’s no longer the case. Since 1970 there are many non ordained Franciscans who have been superiors and some superior generals too.
On Pentecost Sunday, yours truly will be installed as the superior general of the Franciscans of Life (FFV) and he’s not a priest either.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, FFV![]()
Thank you. Just pray for me. I’m really terrified. The souls of these men will be in my care. I’d rather have needles slipped under my finger nails.Praise God, fratello! I am so proud of you, amico mio! Well deserved. You are a breath of fresh air to the Order, and to the Church as a whole.
Congratulazioni!:salute: <–we need that smiley
![]()
HahahahahaThank you. Just pray for me. I’m really terrified. The souls of these men will be in my care. I’d rather have needles slipped under my finger nails.
As Padre Pio said, “Obedience, obedience and more obedience.”
As I like to say, “When you get tired of obeying, take a deep breath and try it again.”
I’ve chosen my motto for my time in office. “Deus eligit stultus”
(God chooses fools).
Fraternally,
Br. JR, FFV![]()
Oh, Okay, I misunderstood. I thought you meant that chant had picked up since Vatican II from what it was between 1800-1950, and I didn’t understand that, given the VII era instruction to return to the sources. (which obviously don’t include scholas for Franciscans)It’s called Oppression.
As a result of Vatican I, the Franciscans were sucked into parish work. There was a need and bishops did not have enough diocesan priests. There were many friars in the missions. They got pulled in by the bishops.
The bishops have power over the Franciscans, because the rule says that Franciscans may never question a bishop, no matter what he commands. They asked for more ordained friars.
…clip…
The lines between religious and laity are being strengthened again.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, FFV![]()
Br JR,That’s no longer the case. Since 1970 there are many non ordained Franciscans who have been superiors and some superior generals too.
On Pentecost Sunday, yours truly will be installed as the superior general of the Franciscans of Life (FFV) and he’s not a priest either.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, FFV![]()
Br JR,Thank you. Just pray for me. I’m really terrified. The souls of these men will be in my care. I’d rather have needles slipped under my finger nails.
As Padre Pio said, “Obedience, obedience and more obedience.”
As I like to say, “When you get tired of obeying, take a deep breath and try it again.”
I’ve chosen my motto for my time in office. “Deus eligit stultus”
(God chooses fools).
Fraternally,
Br. JR, FFV![]()
That’s right. Sometime after 1800 Gregorian Chant was imposed on Franciscans by our superiors, because of the attempt to make Franciscans fit in. It was resisted for about 150 years, until finally the lid flew off the kettle and the friars asked the Holy Father to stop it. That’s when Pope Pius XII promised that change was coming. It did, with Perfectae Caritatis.Oh, Okay, I misunderstood. I thought you meant that chant had picked up since Vatican II from what it was between 1800-1950, and I didn’t understand that, given the VII era instruction to return to the sources. (which obviously don’t include scholas for Franciscans)
I know about the oppression of Franciscan men, particularly friars during the V1-V2 period from your earlier posts.
So the Friars are returning to what’s more Franciscan now, after that period. So chant isn’t used as much now… Is that right, or am I still out in left field someplace?
Ahh, I have found my face book statusThank you. Just pray for me. I’m really terrified. The souls of these men will be in my care. I’d rather have needles slipped under my finger nails.
As Padre Pio said, “Obedience, obedience and more obedience.”
As I like to say, “When you get tired of obeying, take a deep breath and try it again.”
I’ve chosen my motto for my time in office. “Deus eligit stultus”
(God chooses fools).
Fraternally,
Br. JR, FFV![]()
This is really excellent IMHO, keeping in mind both kindness where it’s needed and the charism. Lots of work but a very fraternal and Franciscan result. I see how it works.That’s right. Sometime after 1800 Gregorian Chant was imposed on Franciscans by our superiors, because of the attempt to make Franciscans fit in. It was resisted for about 150 years, until finally the lid flew off the kettle and the friars asked the Holy Father to stop it. That’s when Pope Pius XII promised that change was coming. It did, with Perfectae Caritatis.
However, in order to be charitable to those men who came in between 1800 and 1970, it was decided that instead of banning chant and the Tridentine mass in one swoop, that it would be left up to the house to vote on it. The vote must be approved by the superior. He can veto the house. He cannot impose chant or the EF, because it’s contrary to the mind of Francis and Clare. He can prohibit it, because it would be consistent with the minds of Francis and Clare. I have yet to meet superior who has prohibited it without a good reason. When I was superior of the house, I regulated it. There Chant and the EF lost the vote by one. It’s too close to ignore the other side. It was like a 6 to 5 vote.
Even though the vote said, “No chant” and “No EF”, I overruled it. In instituted chant and EF on certain solemnities to be identified by the superior of the house. That was the end of that discussion. It worked out well. The current superior still uses that same formula. In this house there are five solemnities when neither chant or EF are ever allowed: Easter, Solemnity of St. Clare, Stigmata of St. Francis, Passing of St. Francis and Christmas. it would be highly inconsistent with the minds of the founders to use them on days that are so intimately connected to them.
If we do a Tridentine mass at Christmas, we can’t do the Christmas pageant during the mass. Francis always did the Christmas pageant during the Midnight Mass at Christmas. He created the Christmas pageant and the Passion Play.
If we do the Tridentine mass for the Easter Vigil, we can’t use the Franciscan form, because it does not exist in the Tridentine Form. It’s much older than the Tridentine form. The Franciscan Easter Vigil has 7 readings, the Exulted is chanted by the superior of the house, not by the priest. The mass has to be in dialogue form, it cannot be with a schola. It can be ad orientem and in Latin, but the entire community participates in the prayers. The Tridentine high mass has very little participation by the congregation. This would set the priest apart, which would take us back to the period between 1800 and 1970.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, FFV![]()
It is very hard work and we have not perfected it. We try to be sensitive to the friars who entered before Vatican II. We understand that they never knew the Franciscans of the 13th to 18th century. When they entered, those things were taught as ancient history. They were never taught that this was how they should aspire to live and work. Many said, “Had i know, I wold not have entered.” The entered the order they saw, not the order that had been locked up in a closet for 150 years of its 750 year existence at the time. The Franciscans turned 750 in 1969. This form of Franciscan life really kicked in around 1800 and not with every house either. The Capuchins resisted it as much as they could.This is really excellent IMHO, keeping in mind both kindness where it’s needed and the charism. Lots of work but a very fraternal and Franciscan result. I see how it works.
Interesting. I didn’t know that all those people were involved in this. And I didn’t know that Pius XII & Benedict XV were Franciscans.It is very hard work and we have not perfected it. We try to be sensitive to the friars who entered before Vatican II. We understand that they never knew the Franciscans of the 13th to 18th century. When they entered, those things were taught as ancient history. They were never taught that this was how they should aspire to live and work. Many said, “Had i know, I wold not have entered.” The entered the order they saw, not the order that had been locked up in a closet for 150 years of its 750 year existence at the time. The Franciscans turned 750 in 1969. This form of Franciscan life really kicked in around 1800 and not with every house either. The Capuchins resisted it as much as they could.
Some key players in bringing back the original spirit of St. Francis died without ever knowing that they were key players. They were either members of one of the mendicant orders or members of one of the mendicant secular orders.
Fraternally,
- Pope Benedict XV (Franciscan)
- St. Maximilian Kolbe (Conventual Franciscan)
- Ven. Solanus Casey (Capuchin Franciscan)
- Ven. Pius XII (Franciscan)
- St. Padre Pio (Capuchin Franciscan)
- Bl. John XXIII (Franciscan)
- Pope Paul VI (Dominican)
- Bl. John Paul II (Discalced Carmelite)
Br. JR, FFV![]()
Every pope from Pius IX to John XXIII was either a Franciscan Friar or a professed Secular Franciscan. This brought many Franciscans to work at the Vatican, for the Vatican, at the Holy See and for the Papal HouseholdInteresting. I didn’t know that all those people were involved in this. And I didn’t know that Pius XII & Benedict XV were Franciscans.
Now that I look at it, that’s a long list of fairly recent religious, and a lot of them are popes.
I know about Solanus Casey. I think he was a Capuchin and he was from the Midwest. There is an SFO fraternity in Detroit, I think, named after him.
I’m sure it varies from one community to another, but do most still lean this way? Maybe it wouldn’t be mandatory for an educated novice to begin the path toward priesthood, but he’d be strongly encouraged toward it, especially if the community hasn’t had many vocations recently?Only the unlettered could be non ordained friar. If you were educated, you had to be a priest
In fact, most lean away from that now. Religious enter communities to live the charism of the community. If you enter the Jesuits, you know that it’s a clerical order. You will be a priestI’m sure it varies from one community to another, but do most still lean this way? Maybe it wouldn’t be mandatory for an educated novice to begin the path toward priesthood, but he’d be strongly encouraged toward it, especially if the community hasn’t had many vocations recently?
Yes, and the great majority of Secular Franciscans are professed laity. The Minister General of the Secular Franciscans in Rome is a professed layperson. Her name is Encarnación del Pozo OFS, and I believe she’s from Spain.In fact, most lean away from that now. Religious enter communities to live the charism of the community. If you enter the Jesuits, you know that it’s a clerical order. You will be a priest
…clip…
We cannot forget that we also have 20,000 cloistered nuns. This number is second only to the Benedictine nuns. The Secular Franciscans number 500,000. They make up almost one third of the order. Among them there are lay people and clergy.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, FFV![]()
A small correction: Bl John XXIII was an OFSIt is very hard work and we have not perfected it. We try to be sensitive to the friars who entered before Vatican II. We understand that they never knew the Franciscans of the 13th to 18th century. When they entered, those things were taught as ancient history. They were never taught that this was how they should aspire to live and work. Many said, “Had i know, I wold not have entered.” The entered the order they saw, not the order that had been locked up in a closet for 150 years of its 750 year existence at the time. The Franciscans turned 750 in 1969. This form of Franciscan life really kicked in around 1800 and not with every house either. The Capuchins resisted it as much as they could.
Some key players in bringing back the original spirit of St. Francis died without ever knowing that they were key players. They were either members of one of the mendicant orders or members of one of the mendicant secular orders.
Fraternally,
- Pope Benedict XV (Franciscan)
- St. Maximilian Kolbe (Conventual Franciscan)
- Ven. Solanus Casey (Capuchin Franciscan)
- Ven. Pius XII (Franciscan)
- St. Padre Pio (Capuchin Franciscan)
- Bl. John XXIII (Franciscan)
- Pope Paul VI (Dominican)
- Bl. John Paul II (Discalced Carmelite)
Br. JR, FFV![]()
Yes, I know. But most people don’t know what OFS is yet. Some people still have SFO or TOSF or TOS in their memory banks. The younger people probably are probably more familiar with SFO, since OFS in English is less than 6 months old.A small correction: Bl John XXIII was an OFS![]()