M
Mark_Renaud
Guest
Another way of asking my question is how many Down Syndrome Babies would be born if abortion wasnât an option?
Please give me hard facts or point me in the right direction:thumbsup:
thanks, Mark Renaud
Rich, I appreciate your response. Can anybody else comment with certainty? Are we actually killing almost 50,000 babies every year who have been diagnosed with Down Syndrome?I asked this same question of the genetics counselor that workied with my wife and I when we found out our daughter that my wife was pregant with had DS. This is not actual data, but information that came from her based on her employer, which was Kaiser Permanente in California. Based on the AFP test, over 80% of women abort their children who âmayâ be born with DS. The sad thing is that the AFP test has anywhere from a 25-60% false positive rating, depending on who you talk to.
According to wikipedia, a study done in 2002 says that 91-93% of all pregnancies in the United States with a diagnosis of DS are terminated by abortion.
A woman of normal child bearing age has a 1 in 865 chance of having a baby with DS. As she gets older those chances are higher. Any woman who has a child with DS then has a 1 in 100 chance regardless of age of having a second child with DS. Keep in mind that different websites will quote slightly different statistics, but they are all pretty close.
If I can find anymore information, I will come back and post it.
After re-reading your question, I think I misunderstood what your were asking. If 90% are aborted, then 5500 represents 10%. That would mean that 49,500 were aborted. Where did you get 550 from? Is that per year?
Rich, thanks for the info. In reality, obviously one is too many!:Mark, after looking ot the numbers, I would say that yes, it is entirely possible we are killing that many babies with DS every year. If we multiply 4000 abortions a day times 365 days, we have over 1.4 million abortions each year. According to the Guttmacher Institute, 13% of these abortions are due to a potential health risk. That would be 189,800. So yes, there is certainly room for 45.500 babies with DS to fit.
I would wonder, however, how many of those so called diagnosis were accurate, comsidering the potential for false positives from the AFP test. I donât think we will see really accurate numbers, but the numbers are alarming none the less.
And when a parent brings a two week old infant in to the doc, that doc should also ask âdo you want this child to liveâ.hays1122 writes:
âThis should not be allowed. Doctors should not be suggesting or even asking,âDo you want to keep it?ââ
This is a medical question, not a moral one. A doctor cannot treat a patient without knowing that patientâs wishes. What if the woman chooses to carry her pregnancy to term, all the while dealing with the stress and heartache of possibly/probably giving birth to a baby who is mentally or physically challenged to some degree? That information is of great significance with regard to the motherâs health and to the fetusâ health.
A doctor has an ethical responsibility to ask questions such as this of his patients. Anything less is inferior medical care.
marietta
Wow.How many babies are aborted in the United States after receiving a Down Syndrome diagnosis? We already know that 5500 Down Syndrome Babies are born. We also know that 90% of women who have the diagnostic testing performed while they are pregnant choose to have the baby killed. But how many are actually killed?
Another way of asking my question is how many Down Syndrome Babies would be born if abortion wasnât an option?
Please give me hard facts or point me in the right direction:thumbsup:
thanks, Mark Renaud
For many parents it was fears linked to the quality of life the child could expect.We also know that 90% of women who have the diagnostic testing performed while they are pregnant choose to have the baby killed.
That extends to other âsevere genetic abnormalitiesâ - we kill 9 out of 10 imperfect babies in this country. It is horrible.Wow.I didnât know that 90% of women who get a Downâs Syndrome diagnosis for their baby aborted their baby. That is just shocking and incredibly sad.
![]()
With all three of my children, my wife was aksed if she planned on keeping the baby. I was so disgusted with this question it made me sick. This is not a medical question, itâs a sad sign of the condition of our society. And then, during the pregnancy of my daughter with Down Syndrome, my wife was given the chance to abort on at least three occasions by the so called high risk pregnancy doctor. I started to feel like our HMO was forcing their doctors to say these things so children like mine wouldnât burden their system. After the last time he gave her the chance, I had words with him. Believe me, he walked on egg shells after that. If we would have known better, we would have requested a new doctor. There are far better approaches to this situation.hays1122 writes:
âThis should not be allowed. Doctors should not be suggesting or even asking,âDo you want to keep it?ââ
This is a medical question, not a moral one. A doctor cannot treat a patient without knowing that patientâs wishes. What if the woman chooses to carry her pregnancy to term, all the while dealing with the stress and heartache of possibly/probably giving birth to a baby who is mentally or physically challenged to some degree? That information is of great significance with regard to the motherâs health and to the fetusâ health.
A doctor has an ethical responsibility to ask questions such as this of his patients. Anything less is inferior medical care.
marietta
********. That is some poor moral interpretation, and probably false too. They just donât want THEIR quality of life to go down! âOh no, Iâll have to wipe my childâs butt until he/she is an adult!âFor many parents it was fears linked to the quality of life the child could expect.
Things seem to be improving the other side of the pond.
For starters, these questions were asked by the nurses who would call to confirm the results of the pregnancy tests. This had nothing to do with potential issues with the baby. They were part of a large HMO, so although disgusted, we didnât make too much of it. The bottom line it that this line of questioning is not necessary from a nurse calling to confim the results. Why not just confirm the results and then ask when the woman would like to schedule her first exam? We never had any issues with the doctors. Of course with the question already asked, the doctor never had to ask. Besides, we were members of a large HMO and really didnât have that many alternatives.RichT:
If, upon being asked if you and your wife chose to keep your baby, you were " . . . so disgusted with this question it made [me] sick", then why were you not compelled to change practitioners after you were first asked?
Doctors will better know how to advance with a pregnancy if they are informed as to the physical, emotional, mental and spiritual condition of the woman and, secondarily, the man (if he is even present in the scenario). Yes. Secondarily.
You always have options. You always have a choice. If your gut told you to seek prenatal care elsewhere, why did you ignore it?
marietta
What a contemptuous thing to say. So you know the mind and soul and heart of every woman informed she was carrying a child with down syndrome do you???********. That is some poor moral interpretation, and probably false too. They just donât want THEIR quality of life to go down! âOh no, Iâll have to wipe my childâs butt until he/she is an adult!â
No, it has nothing to do with the kids quality of life, and everything to do with theirs.