It’s very questionable whether breaking civic laws are sinful. IF they have little to do with moral codes they may not be a sin at all. In fact if the civic law contradicts morality it may even be more sinful to obey it.
For example in Germany, Hitler made it illegal to do business with jews. To follow such an unjust law would be against moral code to deal fairly with all peoples. It would not be sinful to break such laws and more sinful to follow them.
Downloading legally may be somewhat sinful (minor unless you really believe that it is a serious offense) in that ideally you are obtaining something that does not rightfully belong to you, IF the orginator of the material does want to have it distributed for free.
IF the orginator (creator of the music for example) of the download does not care if the music is distributed, then the download is not sinful whether done legally or illegally. I think in this case the breaking of the civil law does not break any moral priniciples because the rightful owner is willing to give it away for free.
IF you download illegally and the ‘owner’ of the download does NOT want it distributed then, I think the action is sinful. BUT unless you think it is seriously sinful, it is not a mortal sin.
Personally I don’t think it is seriously sinful, but I don’t download stuff anyway. So to me it is a mote point. My kids are big time downloaders, and we sometimes debate the morality of this. They think it actually helps the music industry because they listen to one or two of the songs and end up buying the CD anyway.
The morality of a high tech world gets more complicated with every new advance. Pretty soon we will have to add in a few new commandments… thou shalt not download or thou shalt not break copy write protection…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a13ae/a13ae33b5b5751f9760619682dff37534f39b0f9" alt="Nerd face :nerd: 🤓"
:whacky:
wc