T
tjm190
Guest
It’s a cultural thing- you can spout “back in my day” and try to correlate respect and your standard of dress, but an individual cultural perspective is far from universal.
I don’t look good in a dress. (Sorry)Why not get a suit and a dress? There’s cheap ones all over the place. It’s a non-issue. It seems like you are saying you don’t have an issue with “dressing nicely” as long as it fits your definition of what dressing nicely is. They set the guidelines for their parish, they use words like “please” and “should.” I seriously doubt they will kick anybody out; rather they will be taken aside and corrected after mass. Then if the person persists, he is rebelling against the authority of the priest.
Well, authority and respect. I would respect my fellow catholics by wearing a headcovering should I go to a mass where the parish requires it…plus I think they are SO gorgeous!!I think that people need to realize, as whiteacre said, that this is an authority issue.
You are right. It should be much more important to be at mass. I wear jeans because I like it. Can somebody explain why it is inappropriate to wear jeans in church?Shouldn’t it be much more important to be at mass, rather than how you’re dressed?
Would this, by any chance, be St. Mary’s in Tacoma? If so, they are a group of Sedevacantists who only celebrate the Latin Mass (obviously) and are VERY traditional. I’ve been there twice for Mass and they are very nice, especially the Pastor, Fr. Trough. However they are, unfortunately not in communion with Rome (again, obviously, haha). So if you do want to see a TLM, but don’t want to go all the way to Seattle, then it would be a great place to stop, although I wouldn’t receive Communion there as it isn’t clear on whether or not they have valid Orders.I haven’t attended mass in a long time and am not currently a member of a parish.
While looking online at local area Churches to join, I came across one with a dress code.
DRESS CODE - Out of respect for the Most Blessed Sacrament, and for your fellow parishioners, please observe the following standards of dress in church:
· Jeans, shorts, “flip flops” and other casual attire are inappropriate at church services.
· Women and girls must cover their heads with a suitable hat or veil (I Cor. 11:5,6,10). Chapel veils are available for loan in the vestibule.
· Women and girls must wear dresses or skirts that cover the knee completely when sitting or standing. Slacks, sleeveless tops and tight or low-cut clothing do not meet the norm of Christian modesty.
· Men and boys should wear suit coats and ties.
· Tee shirts are not acceptable; please wear a collared shirt.
I’m not writing this to knock a practice, but in my mind this is a church concentrating on the wrong things.
Shouldn’t it be much more important to be at mass, rather than how you’re dressed?
Has this become a common practice during my absence from the church?
I believe some other forum members have made some significant contributions to this. It more or less lies within a person’s motives for even arguing against a dress code. There are two trains of thought that appear on this:You are right. It should be much more important to be at mass. I wear jeans because I like it. Can somebody explain why it is inappropriate to wear jeans in church?
Uh, Nathan, I don’t look good in a dress because I’m a guy. It was a joke."I don’t look good in a dress. (Sorry) "
**Response: You’re not there to impress other people. It’s not an issue about what you feel, or what you want to wear. It’s a very simple issue about obeying the priest. You are all making more out of this than necessary. As for speaking about priorities, your priority at that particular parish is to obey the ecclesial authority over you, and in this case, that authority says to dresss a certain way. That’s priority, not how good you look or don’t look in a dress. The post, once again, nowhere states that anybody will be kicked out, forbidden the host, etc. You are making an unwarranted assumption and then comparing it to someone not in good standing with the Church.
Now lets flip this. Suppose you knew the dress code at this particular parish and refused to dress as asked by the Priest. Now **you ****are not in good standing with the Church because you are in a mortal state of rebellion towards the authorities appointed over you. It’s pride, pure and simple. You’re absolutely correct. Priorities. This isn’t a cultural argument, it is an authority arguement. The Priest wins.
I’m not interested in being a follower of those that dress down to attend church.
Umm, no it isn’t. It is easiest for her to wear what she does.The priest set the rules. People can follow it. You don’t like it? It’s really simple, let go of the pride and buy a suit. That simple. Or go to a different parish. Subjecting yourself to the authority of the priest is something people seem to have a serious problem with.
Response: What does that have to do with anything? It’d probably be easier for her to put on a dress than pants.
I wear dresses or skirts all the times and not just to church. In fact, when I wear pants or shorts, my family comments. My dress doesn’t fly up either. But as I said my mother weights over 200lbs. Maybe you don’t know, but as a woman grows larger, it becomes more difficult to find something that fits. Dresses and skirts on a woman that size tend to ride up.And since there is much of her body she can’t feel, she might not notice.The post didn’t say she would be turned away or barred entry, so you’re just reading words into it that aren’t there. I think the fact that you “presume” to know her dress would fly up and not cover her is a bit ridiculous as well. I can’t recall this ever happening to my knowledge, and my mother wore dresses all the time.
Yes, we are all Catholic. And as I said, I wear skirts or dresses to church and just around town, so I don’t consider people that dress up for Mass elitists.Your sarcasm is just coming off as ignorant. As for the “religion” comment, grow up. You’re putting people down that think it’s a good idea to dress up for Church and essentially calling them elitists, then implying that you are morally superior. Recognizing the irony, yet? News flash, we are Catholic too. The difference is, I see no reason not to obey the priest on a matter such as proper wear for mass. If you can’t obey the little things, how do you obey with the greater things entrusted to you?
It would seem that you are taking this quote from 1 Sam out of context. For one thing, God was commanding Samuel not to assume Eliab was in good standing with God just because he looked like it; he was not passing judgement on whether clothing matters when going before the Lord in worship.I agree with you. The person’s heart is more important than his clothes. In 1 Sam 16:7 God told Samuel not to look upon appearance as a basis for making judgements. I wonder if a homeless man came to this church, how would he be treated.
If you don’t like 1 Sam, and I don’t think I took it out of context, how about James 2:1-7 -It would seem that you are taking this quote from 1 Sam out of context. For one thing, God was commanding Samuel not to assume Eliab was in good standing with God just because he looked like it; he was not passing judgement on whether clothing matters when going before the Lord in worship.
Western civilization has a long tradition of “dressing for the occasion”. To dress inappropriately for the presence of the person you are visiting (or who is visiting) is to suggest indifference for that person’s status.
While Christ loves and accepts us regardless of our appearances, it is odd that so many people think “what you wear to Mass doesn’t matter because Jesus loves you!” but will go out and buy a whole new wardrobe when they get a new job.
BTW, in the interest of full disclosure, I’m a “nice jeans” and “decent shirt” kind of guy most of the time, too.
Peace,
Dante