M
Melissa
Guest
I believe the law is unjust because the federal government has, IMO, overstepped its bounds by creating a situation in which the states are “free” as long as the states don’t mind being punished for making a perfectly legitimate choice.
Furthermore, I believe that magic-age legislation is a bad idea. I believe that poor behavior connected with drinking (drunkenness, driving under the influence, etc.) should be punished (and more effectively … drunk drivers have to kill or maim someone or get into double-digit convictions before they do actual jail time). Responsible drinking is possible and should be encouraged amongst those who wish to consume alcohol.
The fact is that wine enhances the flavor of many foods, both as an ingredient and as an accompaniment. Beer also can enhance food flavor (I have a killer beer-cheese sauce recipe, and honestly–bratwurst without beer? no way!). A single glass of wine with a fine dinner needn’t even involve becoming tipsy, let alone drunk.
So, in short, I do not think there is anything immoral about an under 21 individual engaging in responsible consumption with an over-21 spouse.
Furthermore, I believe that magic-age legislation is a bad idea. I believe that poor behavior connected with drinking (drunkenness, driving under the influence, etc.) should be punished (and more effectively … drunk drivers have to kill or maim someone or get into double-digit convictions before they do actual jail time). Responsible drinking is possible and should be encouraged amongst those who wish to consume alcohol.
The fact is that wine enhances the flavor of many foods, both as an ingredient and as an accompaniment. Beer also can enhance food flavor (I have a killer beer-cheese sauce recipe, and honestly–bratwurst without beer? no way!). A single glass of wine with a fine dinner needn’t even involve becoming tipsy, let alone drunk.
So, in short, I do not think there is anything immoral about an under 21 individual engaging in responsible consumption with an over-21 spouse.