Dunk the host, the Chalice is gross!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kevin_B
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
One small consideration
Intincturing does pose a problem for Celiacs who must avoid any wheaten products or wheat contamination.
Some celiacs receive only from the chalice.

They prefer not to cause any issue with special hosts, prefer to avoid the inconvenience it causes the priest.
Acceptable ultra low gluten hosts such as made by the Benedictine Sisters can be expensive, butwheat and water are the only matter permitted by Canon Law. Hosts made from non-wheat are not matter for consecration.
 
Perhaps you feel much worse off now, but for me, it is entirely the opposite. For me the Mass is so much more meaningful. I constantly find new meaning in the words of the liturgy and the language helps me to raise my mind to God, something that never happened with the Latin Mass, even when I was studying Latin. (Admittedly, I have less than no aptitude for languages, a weakness I share with many other.) Despite my best efforts I constantly became lost in attempting to translate and lost my focus on the Sacrifice or else lapsed into rote and meaningless parroting.

And I never had an opportunity to attend Mass in Latvia or Japan so that was never an issue, nor is it for most Catholics 99% of the time.
Mass isn’t about how it makes us feel; it’s about the Sacrifice to God. The generation that wanted to kill the old Mass is dying off itself and the TLM is only growing in numbers. As this happens, reform of the Novus Ordo Mass will follow. The TLM is where the growth is in Catholicism at the moment, as young people discover the beauties and mysteries of it that were predetermined for them to be no good. Oh how I would have thrived growing had I been allowed access to our Catholic culture! Here we are at a point in time where many seminaries aren’t even able to ordain a single priest in a year while the traditional seminaries such as those of the FSSP are absolutely packed. If reform of the NO Mass was not the point of Pope Benedict’s bringing back of the old Mass, to show us what the Mass is supposed to be and where everything in the new Mass came from, then I don’t know what was. Don’t be surprised if we start to eventually see far more reverent Ad Orientem Novus Ordo Masses with Latin used during certain parts such as the consecration, just as Vatican II had intended. It’s been a long time coming. And it’s quite simple to follow the old Mass with a missal. Either you want to know Latin or you don’t. I’m a native English speaker who failed my language courses in high school. I’ve never studied Latin at all yet I can recite parts of the Mass such as the Nicene creed off the top of my head in pretty good Latin. If I can do this, literally anyone can. Vatican II demands it of Catholics.

And whether or not you’ll ever go to Mass in those countries is irrelevant; the point is that whether you lived in USA, Latvia, or Japan and were a Catholic you would have attended the same Mass and been taught the same thing. Now the Mass is different wherever you go which is quite sad. The Universal Church is all of a sudden somehow less Universal.
 
But the cup., the cup! The cup is not part of Jesus’ body. It carries disease. Every time your lips touch that cup, you get the bacteria and viruses from every single person in that Church.
Not true. EMHC’s are taught (or should be taught!) to wipe and rotate the cup. So, at best, you touch a part of the cup that only a portion (maybe 1/10?) of the congregation has touched. And, in most parishes, multiple chalices (2 or 4, usually) are used. And, many people do not receive from the chalice. And, the people who receive first ‘re-touch’ a part of the chalice that less people have touched. So, on average, you’re really talking about touching a part of the chalice that maybe 1/80th of the congregation has touched? So, that comes to about 3 or 4 people?
There is no article of faith which requires everyone in a Church to slobber after each other in the same cup in the midst of flu season.
True; some parishes choose to withhold the chalice during flu season. More to the point, people who have the flu should make the common-sense choice to stay away from receiving from a chalice while they’re sick!
I have seen some Protestant Churches use “shotglasses” but that just seems undignified.
Worse that ‘undignified’ is the fact that some liquid would remain in each plastic cup; it would be unthinkable to just throw away the Precious Blood from hundreds of plastic cups!
The solution, instead, comes to me from our Orthodox brothers. My cousins are Eastern Orthodox and brought me to their service over the weekend. For each person (who was, as is proper, kneeling for the Host) the priest took a host, dunked it in the blood, then served it.
The host was unleavened, wasn’t it? And the priest didn’t use a spoon to serve communion to the people? So… everyone sharing a cup is gross to you, but everyone sharing a spoon isn’t? :hmmm:
 
The wine that is change to Christ Blood, does have some alchol in it, I do not know how much, but it could be enough to kill most germs.
 
Mass isn’t about how it makes us feel; it’s about the Sacrifice to God. The generation that wanted to kill the old Mass is dying off itself and the TLM is only growing in numbers. As this happens, reform of the Novus Ordo Mass will follow. The TLM is where the growth is in Catholicism at the moment, as young people discover the beauties and mysteries of it that were predetermined for them to be no good. Many seminaries aren’t even able to ordain a single priest in a year while the traditional seminaries such as those of the FSSP are absolutely packed. If reform of the NO Mass was not the point of Pope Benedict’s bringing back of the old Mass, to show us what the Mass is supposed to be and where everything in the new Mass came from, then I don’t know what was. Don’t be surprised if we start to eventually see far more reverent Ad Orientem Novus Ordo Masses with Latin used during certain parts such as the consecration, just as Vatican II had intended. It’s been a long time coming. It’s quite simple to follow the old Mass with a missal. Either you want to know Latin or you don’t. I’m a native English speaker who failed my language courses in high school. I’ve never studied Latin at all yet I can recite parts of the Mass such as the Nicene creed off the top of my head in pretty good Latin. If I can do this, literally anyone can. Vatican II demands it of Catholics.

And whether or not you’ll ever go to Mass in those countries is irrelevant; the point is that whether you lived in USA, Latvia, or Japan and were a Catholic you would have attended the same Mass and been taught the same thing. Now the Mass is different wherever you go which is quite sad. The Universal Church is all of a sudden somehow less Universal.
Please note that I never said anything about how the Latin Mass made me “feel.” I said that being able to I was better able to worship God when I did not become distracted by a translation. The Mass was in Latin for the first twenty-some years of my life; I remember how much better I was able to participate when the switch was made to English. I could probably recite the entire Mass in Latin, even to today. But then so too could a parrot. For me, the meaning became real and I was able to lift my heart to God more fully when it was said in my native tongue. For me, a foreign language put a barrier between me and full participation. In Latin, the Mass was a performance; when it moved to English, I became part of the Mass.

The young people you say are now discovering the beauties of the Mass in Latin are able to appreciate it because they understand it BECAUSE it has been celebrated in English their entire lives and they understand it so well. When I was in HS, we had to have demonstration Masses to explain what was going on at each part of the Mass.

And children were at a loss to understand what was going on at any point unless they had an adult instructing them, which was another distraction for the adults.

This may be a regional thing, but where I live, I know of no parishes that have NO Masses. When we travelled out of town to a family wedding, we happened to attend a NO Mass the next morning. Every single family member who was old enough to remember when the Mass was celebrated in Latin said how glad they were that English was now the norm.

I believe that “universal” refers to the truths that the Church teaches, not the language they’re taught in.

Obviously, your experience differs from mine, but my point was that “we” are not worse off now, since that is an subjective judgment.
 
The host was unleavened, wasn’t it? And the priest didn’t use a spoon to serve communion to the people? So… everyone sharing a cup is gross to you, but everyone sharing a spoon isn’t? :hmmm:
The Eastern Orthodox Churches, being Byzantine, always use leavened bread. I am not sure what the OP meant in describing the priest “taking a host and dunking[sic] it” but generally there is a loaf of consecrated bread that is immersed in the Precious Blood before it is administered to the people.
 
The Eastern Orthodox Churches, being Byzantine, always use leavened bread.
Whoops! My mistake! I meant to write “leavened”; that’s what I get for posting before my first cup of coffee…! :coffeeread:
I am not sure what the OP meant in describing the priest “taking a host and dunking[sic] it” but generally there is a loaf of consecrated bread that is immersed in the Precious Blood before it is administered to the people.
well… not a ‘loaf’, but cubes that are immersed immediately before administering to a person. With a spoon. (And therefore, not a solution to the “icky shared chalice” problem that the OP perceives… ;))
 
well… not a ‘loaf’, but cubes that are immersed immediately before administering to a person. With a spoon. (And therefore, not a solution to the “icky shared chalice” problem that the OP perceives… ;))
Well, the way I understand it, the spoon rarely touches anyone’s mouth. Priests are quite skilled at aiming and dropping the sacred species in mouths. Furthermore, gold and silver are antimicrobial, as has been explained, and you’re not getting any backwash or mixing of saliva with the sacred species in the chalice. This spoon method is extremely reverent, efficient and clean. It’s a testament to Medieval pre-germ-theory Europe that Latin Catholics think a shared cup is a Good Idea.

Also, there’s nothing undignified with using a straw as the OP claimed. In fact a straw, or more properly a pipette, can easily be used for infants or invalids who only need to be administered the smallest drop. The capillary action of the tube causes the Blood to flow upwards and then it can be droppered into the mouth. This is all approved by Rome for hundreds of years.
 
Someone who believes that the host is only the body of Christ and that what is in the chalice is only the blood of Christ are in error. Each of the two species is the body, blood, soul, and divinity of Christ, so that you do not have to receive both species. Just receiving the host you receive the body, blood, soul, and divinity of Christ. So if you want to refrain from receiving from the chalice or cup that is okay. Personally, I sometimes refrain from receiving from the cup. If my lips are dry and cracked, or if I am ill, I refrain. And sometimes I refrain simply to remind myself that receiving the host alone I have received the Lord, body, blood, soul, and divinity, and nothing more is necessary. Sometimes I refrain from receiving from the cup just to go back to my seat quicker so I can pray longer.

But please do not refer to the Chalice of everlasting salvation as a “spittoon.” That is just as disrespectful as when people swing them at arms’ length and saunter to the sacrarium laughing about how they’re going to wash the dishes.

-God Bless!
 
Well, the way I understand it, the spoon rarely touches anyone’s mouth.
True, but you’ve got the same problem as COTT: aerosolized saliva from the mouth of the recipient. Whereas a person receiving CITH at an OF Mass has a decent chance of escaping that possibility, the fact of the single form of receiving (intincted cubes of eucharistic bread on a spoon) in the Eastern Churches means that you’re kind of stuck on that front.
you’re not getting any backwash or mixing of saliva with the sacred species in the chalice.
No backwash, true. But transmission of saliva is still a distinct possibility…
 
Using the words “dunking” and “gross” when referring to receiving the Body and Blood of the Lord? :eek:

Surely there’s a way to express any concerns, and still be respectful.
Good point. I’ll watch out in the future.
Actually, that is not possible, no. You are incorrect in your reasoning. The sacred species are not immune from disease because think about it: if they were immune, then it would be scientifically possible to precisely discern consecrated Eucharist from ordinary bread and wine. It is not possible to discern these physically, so the sacred species must retain all the physical properties of their natural form.

That being said, I sincerely agree with your proposal for intinction. It is a fantastic way to reverently disallow CITH. The only problem is the logistics. First of all, not all parishes want to offer Precious Blood at all, due to cost of wine and risk of profanation and staining of purificators and excess Extraordinary Ministers. Also, intinction is difficult for one minister to accomplish without a specially-made sacred vessel. Also, people are really unfamiliar with this method in the Church today, and so you will get a lot of resistance from people who are simply weirded out by it. But otherwise, I say go for it. Convince your pastor it’s a good idea, I’ll support you.

But please disabuse yourself of the superstition about the sacred species and disease. And seek some professional help, because you are coming across as something of a germophobe.
That’s a good point about the Blood. I was mainly just saying that so I didn’t get accused of being unfaithful by believing the blood can carry germs, since that’s the reaction I usually get when starting this conversation. I’ll have to remember that, although I won’t bring it up to my M-I-L, i’ve decided to stop bringing up our differences of faith since they cause nothing but discord and I’m not going to change her ways, anyhow.

I’m very far from a germophobe. If you told that to anyone at my office, or my wife, they would probably laugh because I’m not a very clean person at all. But drinking the backwash of a hundred people is where I draw the line.
I have seen people place the host in the chalice themselves and the priests dont mind at all.

As for catching germs or diseases i like to think that the blood of Christ heals everything it touches there is no need to worry about someone elses spit.

As an EHMC we always wipe the chalice before letting the next person receive.

Plus, when i have given out the Body of Christ you will be surprised how one cant help to touch peoples tongues on the odd occassion!! It is not an automated process! It is done with piety and the love of God.
Actually, I also get the host on my tongue. I have no problem with the priests hand there, even if it touches my tongue, because I’m sure he washes his hands, and even though he is touching the mouths of other people, he doesn’t touch EVERYONE’S mouth (only some on accident), and even so, there’s no backwash involved.

See? I’m not a clean freak if I’m letting someone put stuff in my mouth! I understand that there is no possible way of making sure everything handed out is 100% sterile, and that’s perfectly fine. I’m just searching for the compromise where we’re at least PRETENDING to be conscious about food safety.

(Oh, and thanks for the clarification on the spoon and straw thing. I was under the impression they were just regular spoons and straws, but looking at pictures they seem like perfectly acceptable alternatives. Oh, and ditto on the “Orthodox priest dips each piece of bread before distributing it” thing.)
Perhaps you feel much worse off now, but for me, it is entirely the opposite. For me the Mass is so much more meaningful. I constantly find new meaning in the words of the liturgy and the language helps me to raise my mind to God, something that never happened with the Latin Mass, even when I was studying Latin. (Admittedly, I have less than no aptitude for languages, a weakness I share with many other.) Despite my best efforts I constantly became lost in attempting to translate and lost my focus on the Sacrifice or else lapsed into rote and meaningless parroting.

And I never had an opportunity to attend Mass in Latvia or Japan so that was never an issue, nor is it for most Catholics 99% of the time.
I agree, although as I mentioned I still prefer the Priest to face the same direction as me when praying. Makes more sense.

And I never understood the “travelling abroad” argument. If I go to Japan, it doesn’t matter whether or not the mass is in Japanese (a language I don’t know) or Latin (a language I don’t know). I’m equally confused either way.
The wine that is change to Christ Blood, does have some alchol in it, I do not know how much, but it could be enough to kill most germs.
Not enough, sorry. It’s hard to explain without going into great detail about how alcohol is created, but wine and beer are both created by living things called yeast. Yeast eats sugar and converts it into alcohol, but too much alcohol, as you said, will kill, even the yeast that created it. Thats why you can never find a wine or beer above about 15-20% alcohol, because that’s the area where the yeast start to die off. Any drink above that (whiskey, vodka, etc) is made artificially, by removing the water from the brew and therefore increasing the alcohol content.

You know, this was meant to be a lighthearted thread but, as always as happens in this forum, I learned a lot of neat things.
 
Good point. I’ll watch out in the future.

That’s a good point about the Blood. I was mainly just saying that so I didn’t get accused of being unfaithful by believing the blood can carry germs, since that’s the reaction I usually get when starting this conversation. I’ll have to remember that, although I won’t bring it up to my M-I-L, i’ve decided to stop bringing up our differences of faith since they cause nothing but discord and I’m not going to change her ways, anyhow.

I’m very far from a germophobe. If you told that to anyone at my office, or my wife, they would probably laugh because I’m not a very clean person at all. But drinking the backwash of a hundred people is where I draw the line.

Actually, I also get the host on my tongue. I have no problem with the priests hand there, even if it touches my tongue, because I’m sure he washes his hands, and even though he is touching the mouths of other people, he doesn’t touch EVERYONE’S mouth (only some on accident), and even so, there’s no backwash involved.

See? I’m not a clean freak if I’m letting someone put stuff in my mouth! I understand that there is no possible way of making sure everything handed out is 100% sterile, and that’s perfectly fine. I’m just searching for the compromise where we’re at least PRETENDING to be conscious about food safety.

(Oh, and thanks for the clarification on the spoon and straw thing. I was under the impression they were just regular spoons and straws, but looking at pictures they seem like perfectly acceptable alternatives. Oh, and ditto on the “Orthodox priest dips each piece of bread before distributing it” thing.)

I agree, although as I mentioned I still prefer the Priest to face the same direction as me when praying. Makes more sense.

And I never understood the “travelling abroad” argument. If I go to Japan, it doesn’t matter whether or not the mass is in Japanese (a language I don’t know) or Latin (a language I don’t know). I’m equally confused either way.

Not enough, sorry. It’s hard to explain without going into great detail about how alcohol is created, but wine and beer are both created by living things called yeast. Yeast eats sugar and converts it into alcohol, but too much alcohol, as you said, will kill, even the yeast that created it. Thats why you can never find a wine or beer above about 15-20% alcohol, because that’s the area where the yeast start to die off. Any drink above that (whiskey, vodka, etc) is made artificially, by removing the water from the brew and therefore increasing the alcohol content.

You know, this was meant to be a lighthearted thread but, as always as happens in this forum, I learned a lot of neat things.
The wine we use at my home parish is 18% alcohol. The wine used for the sacred species is required to have a certain level of alcohol, I think at least 12% but I’m not sure on that number. There are exceptions for alcohol dependent priests.
 
I’ve done intinction at a Catholic Mass
Just because you have done something which was mistakenly allowed doesn’t make it right nor acceptable. You should refrain from self intinction, it is not appropriate and a serious abuse.
 
First of all, my Mother in Law accuses me of not having faith when I mention bacteria, so let me make it clear: It is entirely possible that the Blood of Christ, due to being a supernatural force, is immune from disease and cannot carry bacteria, viruses, whatnot. In fact, let’s say it is, the Blood carries no disease from one person to the other.

But the cup., the cup! The cup is not part of Jesus’ body. It carries disease. Every time your lips touch that cup, you get the bacteria and viruses from every single person in that Church. (I would love to know who taught these people that wiping the cup with a cloth somehow sterilizes it)

This is the 21st Century. There are a lot of changes Catholics resist due to not wanting to compromise on their faith, but I really don’t think Germ Theory is one of them. There is no article of faith which requires everyone in a Church to slobber after each other in the same cup in the midst of flu season. As Catholics, we are supposed to keep our bodies healthy, and drinking out of a spittoon is not doing that.

I have seen some Protestant Churches use “shotglasses” but that just seems undignified. The solution, instead, comes to me from our Orthodox brothers. My cousins are Eastern Orthodox and brought me to their service over the weekend. For each person (who was, as is proper, kneeling for the Host) the priest took a host, dunked it in the blood, then served it.

You get the host.
You get the blood
The blood is presented in a dignified, beautiful chalice
You don’t drink the spit of a hundred other people.
Everyone wins!!!

I say let’s go for it. What about you?

(While we’re at it, we can re-adopt the other measures of their service: The priest facing away from us, praying WITH us instead of TO us, and kneeling for the Host. I like lots of the reforms from Vatican 2, especially eliminating the Latin Mass (Listening to a foreign language for an hour is not conducive to a severely ADHD person paying attention)
The chalice is not gross! It contains the Blood of Our Lord and He is truly and totally present there. You need to read the Church’s teaching on this.
 
Just because you have done something which was mistakenly allowed doesn’t make it right nor acceptable. You should refrain from self intinction, it is not appropriate and a serious abuse.
I mean to say I have received it that way, not that I personally dd it.
 
The chalice is not gross! It contains the Blood of Our Lord and He is truly and totally present there. You need to read the Church’s teaching on this.
The Church teaches that the contents of the cup have been substantially changed but that its accidents remain.

Now I do not know if the Church considers herself generally competent to teach on scientific matters, but: Do you suppose the quality of wine that allows it to be polluted by pathogens is its *substance *or its accidents? Do you suppose that bacteria are capable of a metaphysical calculus which you and I are not, and that they are able to distinguish a cup of the consecrated Blood of Our Lord from a cup of unconsecrated common wine poured out the same bottle? :hmmm:

tee
 
Well, the way I understand it, the spoon rarely touches anyone’s mouth. Priests are quite skilled at aiming and dropping the sacred species in mouths. Furthermore, gold and silver are antimicrobial, as has been explained, and you’re not getting any backwash or mixing of saliva with the sacred species in the chalice. This spoon method is extremely reverent, efficient and clean. It’s a testament to Medieval pre-germ-theory Europe that Latin Catholics think a shared cup is a Good Idea.
While this is true of Greek Catholic Churches , Eastern Orthodox faithful generally put their mouth on the spoon. I’m not sure when or why our practice developed. Romanian and Melkite Catholics use intinction, not a spoon, so perhaps their Orthodox counterparts do as well.
 
“Take this all of you and drink from it.”

Drinking from the chalice better conforms to Jesus’ instructions.

Having said that, I never drink from the cup for the reasons mentioned. I would prefer intinction but there are people who can’t take or dislike one species and intinction creates a burden.

For the same reason, I also touch, instead of kiss, the holy cross on Good Friday. And unless someone holds out their hand, I bow or wave during the sign of peace. I really wish we would all bow. The hand wave can be mistaken for an outstretched hand and it just doesn’t look as dignified.

While we’re on the subject, receiving on the tongue should be more sanitary than receiving in your dirty hands. You probably don’t wash your hands before Mass, you touched the church door handles and pews, and you may have shaken hands during the sign of peace or even held hands during the Our Father. On the other hand, the more people receive on the tongue, the more likely it is that the priest’s fingers will get saliva on it.

So wear gloves to Mass and remove them for communion. Or use hand sanitizer right before communion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top