Dutch government plans to regulate ritual slaughter (no more Kosher meat)

  • Thread starter Thread starter markomalley
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Seems kind of silly; What about if the jew is a hunter?
I dont know what the sense is that they would ban the method unless they are jus tired of catering to people,.
A Jew who hunts his own kosher food would have to be very athletic. He’d have to be quicker that his meal, catch them with his hands, and contain them 🙂
 
You make two very interesting points. First, why do you find it bizarre that a government might want to do this? I am sure there are laws in many countries that regulate how animals are slaughtered. Would it be so unusual for the Dutch government to want to regulate this method of slaughter? The second point you raise seems to me that you suspect the Dutch government might have wanted to prevent this method of slaughter not on animal cruelty grounds but for some other motive. Do you believe the Dutch government want to ban a method of slaughter that is required for meat to be halal or kosher? On what grounds would you believe they wanted to achieve this? I am not an expert on the Dutch. However, a good friend of mine lives and works in the Netherlands. He says the only thing the Dutch are intolerant of is intolerance. I have gained the impression that it is a very fair society that abhors discrimination. On that basis I find it hard to consider the Dutch would want to prevent Jews and Muslims from fulfilling a particular religious observation.
 
I am not an expert on the Dutch.
The Netherlands has proportional representation and really is a multi-party system of coalitions which are more-or-less stable. In the period in question, the small ‘Party For Animals’ proposed the legislation for its own reasons but the strongly anti-Islamic ‘Party For Freedom’ (which is anti-Kosher and anti-Halal) had a large number of seats in the Parliament as well and, while it wasn’t part of the Government coalition, it supported the Government (so the Government coalition had enough votes to carry legislation). Hence my suggestion that the real target was (in other words, became in a political rather than ethical sense) Halal (in order to annoy Dutch Muslims).

In the UK, we’ve seen the machinations that go on in our (new for us) Coalition Government. In a system where there are not only parties that are part of the Coalition but also parties that are necessary for the Coalition to have a majority but not part of the Coalition itself (no jobs for the boys and girls) . . . .

So, saying that the Dutch Government was doing anything for nice, neat reasons would be stretching it. What happened was that legislation (the equivalent in the British system of a ‘Private Members’ Bill’) was passed by the Parliament (though not the Senate, if I remember) and it all went on from there until the legislation was, ultimately, defeated.
 
Seems kind of silly; What about if the jew is a hunter?
I dont know what the sense is that they would ban the method unless they are jus tired of catering to people,.
It’s Biblical, so I suppose one’s view could be connected to one’s overall view of the Bible.

504Katrin said it perfectly. In general, religious Jews don’t hunt. We can’t eat the meat, although we could use the pelts/fur. The most famous rabbinic responsum is this:

jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/hunting.html

In terms of the Dutch or others, they don’t have to “cater” to anyone. This is the only way we have eaten meat for THOUSANDS of years.

And it’s not like Jews just showed up in Holland yesterday either:

Jews seem to have lived in the province of Holland before 1593; a few references to them are in existence which distinctly mention them as present in the other provinces at an earlier date, especially after their expulsion from France in 1321 and the persecutions in Hainaut and the Rhine provinces. The first Jews in the province of Gelderland were reported in 1325. Jews have been settled in Nijmegen, the oldest settlement, in Doesburg, Zutphen, and in Arnhem since 1404.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_the_Netherlands#Early_history
 
For those of who are feeble minded, can you please explain what your statement means.
 
YCohen,

Is “kosher food” confined to red meat? I know swine don’t count. What about fish and fowl? I see “kosher salt” at the market. What makes it different from regular salt? I understand that meat is kosher by the way the animal is slaughtered, in a manner to minimize suffering, using a special knife to slit an artery, which is highly commendable. Again, what about fish and fowl? How is their suffering mitigated to make them kosher? What about dairy products or eggs? How are vegetables made kosher? I hope you don’t think my questions are sarcastic. I am very interested in this subject. Mormons claim they are the “Lost Tribe of Israel”, but my Mormon friends don’t eat kosher food. Why not, if they are Jewish? I ask them this question and their eyes glaze over. If Dutch Jews can’t buy kosher meat, will there be a mass exodus to the Bronx and Hollywood? Just joking. If you can’t answer, I will ask my son-in-law who is a plastic surgeon in Los Angeles.
 
YCohen,

Is “kosher food” confined to red meat? I know swine don’t count. What about fish and fowl?
Her’e a good place to start:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosher_animals

The animal must be of a “clean” type, and in the cases of land animals (red meat) and fowl, they must be slaughtered properly, and then salted to remove the blood.
I see “kosher salt” at the market. What makes it different from regular salt?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosher_salt
I understand that meat is kosher by the way the animal is slaughtered, in a manner to minimize suffering, using a special knife to slit an artery, which is highly commendable. Again, what about fish and fowl? How is their suffering mitigated to make them kosher?
Same goes with fowl:

chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/222242/jewish/How-Is-Shechita-Performed.htm

But not with fish. Why not with fish? We learn it from a verse (Numbers 11:22):

If sheep and cattle were slaughtered for them, would it suffice for them? If all the fish of the sea were gathered for them, would it suffice for them?

While animals are slaughtered, fish are simply gathered. Since it is against Jewish law (and according to us, this applies to everyone) to eat an animal while it is still alive- or any part of one, while it must be killed, it doesn’t have to be killed like animals do.

I think from a practical point of view, it would also be impossible to kill a fish like we do with animals, since all kosher fish have scales (so the issues with how the knife cuts without pressing would be insurmountable), and of course, they have no necks.
What about dairy products or eggs?
Dairy products: The milk must come from a kosher animal. Consequently, many Jews will only eat dairy products where the milk was bought from Jews and this can be ensured. However, Rabbi Moshe Feinstein had ruled that since in the US, when one buys milk, it is, by law, cow’s milk, that Jews can rely on the USDA or whoever is in charge of that aspect. I think it depends on the specific country, what animals they raise most, the law, and how stringent they are in enforcing the law.

Eggs also must come from a kosher animal.
How are vegetables made kosher?
All fruits and vegetables are inherently kosher. The issues with them are:
  1. That there isn’t a non-kosher coating (preservative)on them
    That they are properly checked for bugs, worms, etc. and that there are none

    kashrut.com/consumer/vegetables/

    chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/82683/jewish/Fruits-and-Vegetables.htm
    I hope you don’t think my questions are sarcastic. I am very interested in this subject.
    Not only do I not, but I thank you, because though you, I myself have learned new things. For instance, I never really knew why fish don’t require “shechita”. I never really considered it.
    Mormons claim they are the “Lost Tribe of Israel”, but my Mormon friends don’t eat kosher food. Why not, if they are Jewish? I ask them this question and their eyes glaze over.
    Not my cross to bear. 😉 We don’t consider them Jewish.
    If Dutch Jews can’t buy kosher meat, will there be a mass exodus to the Bronx and Hollywood? Just joking. If you can’t answer, I will ask my son-in-law who is a plastic surgeon in Los Angeles.
    Seriously Jack: The Bronx is SO passe. Maybe Jewish grandparents lived there (not mine), but for the most part, the Jewish exodus happened decades ago. The Bronx Jewish population is waning. They moved to the burbs, and they moved out completely.

    Yes- look at LA and the Valley, but also look in your own city of Houston (a huge number of doctors, by the way). Same with South Florida, Atlanta, Phoenix, and other areas. Why live in the dirty, cold north-east when you can live in the sunny south? 👍

    In terms of the Dutch Jews specifically, my guess is that many more would come to Israel or move elsewhere in Europe. I never met an adult Dutch Jew who didn’t speak at least 3 other languages fluently, and many know many more than that.
 
Done correctly, halal slaughter is far kinder than the usual method which can leave animals to thrash around in agony because the stun gun didn’t kill them properly.
The stun gun does not kill them, nor is it meant to. It knocks them unconscious so they are not aware of their throats being cut, nor does it terrify rest of the animals in the chutes awaiting slaughter.
Animal groups condemn slaughter practices
A stun gun blow to the head is a small mercy administered by Australian abattoirs to deaden the agony of slaughter, but most livestock exported to the Middle East must bleed to death.
Halal and kosher meat preparation traditionally require that slaughter be carried out with a single cut to the throat while the animal is still alive, but anti-cruelty campaigners say there is no religious reason to forbid pre-stunning.
The death throes of an animal suffering a mortal throat gash are commonly dismissed as “just twitching nerves” despite veterinary research which shows sheep remain conscious of the pain for 30-40 seconds. For cattle, it’s more like 90 seconds due to a secondary blood supply to the brain that prolongs the suffering.
kind? - like this?

Sheep slaughter ‘cruel and brutal’
THE brutal culling of Australian sheep in Pakistan has been put on hold until at least mid-October after a Karachi court ordered a further independent test of the sheep’s health.
<…>
‘‘Like a giant mass of wool, bloodied and filthy, they lay in trenches - slit open, stabbed or clubbed to death, while many still wriggled with some life left in them, soon to be buried alive.’’
or this?

2000 sheep face ritual slaughter
“If cutting the throat of a fully conscious, terrified sheep in a mosque meets ESCAS standards, then clearly these standards in no way provide a level of care that the Australian community would deem to be acceptable,” Ms White told The Age.
“I have witnessed this festival taking place in many countries over the past decade, and it inevitably has resulted in the most distressing images of cruelty to Australian exported animals. The terror of the animals is palpable, as they inevitably witness as well as sense the mass slaughter taking place.”
or this?

Severe cruelty exposed in slaughterhouses

The federal government is under pressure to end live cattle exports to Indonesia whose abattoirs have been exposed for animal cruelty.
Australian cattle at various abattoirs have been filmed having their throats cut on average 10 times when it should take one, dying prolonged deaths as well as being savagely beaten and gouged.
these were not isolated incidents, but widespread practice in Muslim countries.

If they are going to use a ritual slaughter method, it should be regulated and policed. The animals awaiting slaughter should not be witnessing the slaughter and those carrying it out should know their job so the animal is killed as quickly and cleanly as possible. None of this 10 attempts to cut the jugular. Since 10 cuts is an average, that means that many times it took more than that. :eek:

Are the Dutch acting on this due to the rise of the Muslim population, subsequent rise in demand for halal meat and the brutality and cruelty observed in ritual slaughter?
 
What happens to a Jew if he or she eats a non-kosher food? If I break a Catholic religious law I commit a sin, which I must confess. What happens in Judaism when religious law is broken? Is it a matter for the individual and her/his conscience? Would the individual need to consult a rabbi? Would it be a matter for the community?
 
What happens to a Jew if he or she eats a non-kosher food? If I break a Catholic religious law I commit a sin, which I must confess. What happens in Judaism when religious law is broken? Is it a matter for the individual and her/his conscience? Would the individual need to consult a rabbi? Would it be a matter for the community?
These days there really isn’t a real punishment for it. You can just stew in your own guilt, and the real punishment comes in “the world to come”.

There are exceptions when Jews can break a Kosher diet. There is a principle in Jewish law that the sake of preserving life overrules all over laws, so if you’re stuck somewhere starving and all you have are bacon and cheese sandwiches, you will not be punished for eating them.
 
These days there really isn’t a real punishment for it. You can just stew in your own guilt, and the real punishment comes in “the world to come”.
One can always repent:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repentance_in_Judaism

And in fact, should.
There are exceptions when Jews can break a Kosher diet. There is a principle in Jewish law that the sake of preserving life overrules all over laws, so if you’re stuck somewhere starving and all you have are bacon and cheese sandwiches, you will not be punished for eating them.
More than that: You would be punished for NOT eating them. The Torah commands us (Leviticus 18:5):

Guard My statutes and My laws which a person shall do them and live by them; I am G-d.
To this, the Gemara teaches us: “You should live by them, and not die by them.”
There are only 3 exceptions to this rule:
  1. Idol worship or worshipping anything but the One G-d
  2. Murder
  3. Illicit sexual relations
If someone puts a gun to your head and says do one of these or I will kill you, you can’t.

When I was in the army (the Israeli army), I would always volunteer to go out on patrols on Friday night to show others that desecrating the Sabbath to protect lives is absolutely required- by Torah law.
 
Thank you for the replies. They are interesting. Although I did not know of the exceptions, they did not surprise me. I’m sure most religions will have exceptions that are intended to protect human life.
 
One can always repent:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repentance_in_Judaism

And in fact, should.

More than that: You would be punished for NOT eating them. The Torah commands us (Leviticus 18:5):

Guard My statutes and My laws which a person shall do them and live by them; I am G-d.
To this, the Gemara teaches us: “You should live by them, and not die by them.”
There are only 3 exceptions to this rule:
  1. Idol worship or worshipping anything but the One G-d
  2. Murder
  3. Illicit sexual relations
If someone puts a gun to your head and says do one of these or I will kill you, you can’t.

When I was in the army (the Israeli army), I would always volunteer to go out on patrols on Friday night to show others that desecrating the Sabbath to protect lives is absolutely required- by Torah law.
Actually King David did that once. He went into the temple and took all of their Shabbat bread becuse his guys were starving.
 
What happens to a Jew if he or she eats a non-kosher food? If I break a Catholic religious law I commit a sin, which I must confess. What happens in Judaism when religious law is broken? Is it a matter for the individual and her/his conscience? Would the individual need to consult a rabbi? Would it be a matter for the community?
A Conservative and an Orthodox Jew often keep a different level of kosher, a Reform- often even less.
When I was studying to convert, the Rabbi said that he was not the ‘kosher police’, and that the level of kosher one keeps is between ones conscience and G d.
 
Actually King David did that once. He went into the temple and took all of their Shabbat bread becuse his guys were starving.
Wait a sec… King David was before the Temple. It was his son, Solomon, who built it.

Ah. I found it: 1 Samuel Chapter 21. Not the Temple though.
 
Why does kosher corned beef taste better than non-kosher? Because the way the animal is slaughtered? I read that scientific tests have concluded that the meat from animals humanely slaughtered, such as kosher, is more flavorful. The theory is that the sense of impending death and the subsequent trauma of agonizing pain inflicted by cruel and inhumane killing methods usually practiced in abattoirs releases hormones into the poor beast’s system that affect the taste and texture of the meat in a negative way. I am not a hunter anymore, but I have heard that venison that has been obtained by gunfire and instant death tastes better than when the poor anmal is cruelly shot by bow and arrow resultng in an extended time of terrible agony before its throat is cut. I am for laws that prohibit bow hunting. I guess there is no such thing as kosher venison.
 
I am for laws that prohibit bow hunting.
I agree. Bow-hunting for sport is, in my opinion, barbaric. (I know not every shot from a gun will kill an animal first-thing, but most arrows from a bow won’t either.)

Hunting for sustenance, on the other hand? Gotta do what you gotta do. The goal isn’t to gloat and hoot over the impressive way one just made an animal bleed out, it’s to survive.
 
I agree. Bow-hunting for sport is, in my opinion, barbaric. (I know not every shot from a gun will kill an animal first-thing, but most arrows from a bow won’t either.)

Hunting for sustenance, on the other hand? Gotta do what you gotta do. The goal isn’t to gloat and hoot over the impressive way one just made an animal bleed out, it’s to survive.
I’ve been bow hunting and it’s a far more skilled task to kill with an arrow than a bullet. Problem isn’t the method used, it’s the skill of the hunter. And too many cocky bow hunters take to the forests with close to little training, preparation and close to no realistic expectations of what they’re capable of actually hunting. GOOD bow hunters train under another more experienced hunter for a while, learning to select the correct equipment and what prey they’re capable of hunting, only moving onto more difficult types of prey after they become more confident. Good hunters are also highly trained in how to judge kill shots for each specific type of animal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top