I
itsjustdave1988
Guest
David Zampino:
I agree that at any age, if one does not have full advertence in committing grave sin and have perfect consent of the will in doing so, then guilt is diminished. This occurs at any age. My mother-in-law, bless her soul, is living proof that the so-called “age of reason” may never occur in this lifetime (sorry… that was uncalled for).data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5189/c51896754cb68cae40a1e4aa6cce06ce95147f43" alt="Winking face :wink: 😉"
Yes, but has the Catholic Church ever declared what the “age of reason” is? I don’t know when such an age occurs, do you? Is such a thing of practical use in the scenario above?A bit of a disagreement here . . . while"age of accountability" is not necessarily a good phrase, “age of reason” has been used in Catholic moral theology for time out of mind. Typically, before one has reached the “age of reason” one is not morally capable of even committing a mortal sin. Thus, it is not presumption to suppose that a baptized child who has not attained the “age of reason” and who dies is destined for heaven. This is one reason that, prior to “liturgical reform” that white was used at the funeral of a young child (instead of black or violet); and that the church bells were pealed, rather than tolled. I would suspect (though I have not looked it up) that the same would hold true for the severely retarded.
Just my two cents worth . . .
I agree that at any age, if one does not have full advertence in committing grave sin and have perfect consent of the will in doing so, then guilt is diminished. This occurs at any age. My mother-in-law, bless her soul, is living proof that the so-called “age of reason” may never occur in this lifetime (sorry… that was uncalled for).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5189/c51896754cb68cae40a1e4aa6cce06ce95147f43" alt="Winking face :wink: 😉"