T
Tlaloc
Guest
The “good” science you speak of uniformly comes from corporate hacks who will publish anything they get paid to. These are the same people who time and again came out saying there was no good evidence that tobacco was either addictive or caused cancer. They were liars then and now.When science articles start out by claiming that something is definitively settled I question their political (religious) motivations. There is good science to refute those claims.
techcentralstation.com/081204D.html
Try this book for a good view into the corporate propaganda machine of manufactured science:
amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1585421391/qid=1109371242/sr=8-1/ref=pd_csp_1/104-3009552-5379144?v=glance&s=books&n=507846
their earlier work here
amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1567510604/104-3009552-5379144
is also quite good.
The credible scientists involved agree the issue of whether it happens is settled, the issue of whether man plays a role is settled. Some debate is warranted on how large a role that is. That’s it.