T
TommyWommy
Guest
During this time of year there are Easter pageants and Passion plays being performed at various churches. The ones I am aware of are at Protestant churches. I’ve not known a Catholic church that had one, although I watched the one in Australia for the World Youth event on EWTN. So, I generally consider these events to be primarily a Protestant thing, mainly because that’s where I notice them being promoted and performed. Some of the churches really go all out with huge Broadway production styles, especially a mega church in my area. Anyway, as I was thinking back on the last one I saw, a few things occurred to me that I thought might be worth mentioning for comment and/or discussion.
In the play, an actor portrays Christ being crucified. It was the first time I ever saw a crucifix in a Protestant church. (Much more “real” than a statue)
The play presents Christ in a very “real” fashion. In fact, it was so realistic, it was as if Christ was really, physically present. I marveled at the parallel between the Real Presence of the Eucharistic Lord in the Catholic Mass, and the need for this realistic portrayal of Christ’s body and blood in the play, at a church. There is an intrinsic desire for us (Christians) to have Him present in more than “just” a spiritual form. The Catholic can experience His real, physical presence every day.
Protestants generally use the play as a means of evangelization. They hope people will come to see a production, but be moved by the message of Christ. That’s a good thing. They get excited about the production and put a lot of time and energy into it. They expect people to be converted by being in the “presence” of Christ at the foot of Calvary and by witnessing His sacrifice for them. Again, Catholics have access to this reality every day. How many Catholics take this for granted?
I have mixed emotions about these plays. Part of me appreciates them, but part of me feels like they are a Protestant attempt to create what they are missing in the Mass. I don’t mean that it is a conscious attempt. I mean more like an unconscious attempt to replace a critical part that the Reformation robbed them of: The Real Presence.
One more parallel: Catholics have only male priests to represent Christ. One would never (I hope) see a female playing the part of Christ in one of these plays.
I’m not trying to take jabs at Protestants here or stir up controversy. I simply see some fascinating parallels and I’m wondering if other Catholics have made similar observations.
In the play, an actor portrays Christ being crucified. It was the first time I ever saw a crucifix in a Protestant church. (Much more “real” than a statue)
The play presents Christ in a very “real” fashion. In fact, it was so realistic, it was as if Christ was really, physically present. I marveled at the parallel between the Real Presence of the Eucharistic Lord in the Catholic Mass, and the need for this realistic portrayal of Christ’s body and blood in the play, at a church. There is an intrinsic desire for us (Christians) to have Him present in more than “just” a spiritual form. The Catholic can experience His real, physical presence every day.
Protestants generally use the play as a means of evangelization. They hope people will come to see a production, but be moved by the message of Christ. That’s a good thing. They get excited about the production and put a lot of time and energy into it. They expect people to be converted by being in the “presence” of Christ at the foot of Calvary and by witnessing His sacrifice for them. Again, Catholics have access to this reality every day. How many Catholics take this for granted?
I have mixed emotions about these plays. Part of me appreciates them, but part of me feels like they are a Protestant attempt to create what they are missing in the Mass. I don’t mean that it is a conscious attempt. I mean more like an unconscious attempt to replace a critical part that the Reformation robbed them of: The Real Presence.
One more parallel: Catholics have only male priests to represent Christ. One would never (I hope) see a female playing the part of Christ in one of these plays.
I’m not trying to take jabs at Protestants here or stir up controversy. I simply see some fascinating parallels and I’m wondering if other Catholics have made similar observations.