C
chessnerd321
Guest
My pastor has a knack for starting it when we can do the Easter fire lighting in twilight and then it’s dark to process in. That seems pretty darn ideal to me.
Yes, its supposed to start when it’s dark.In an effort to make the Easter Vigil more family-friendly this year, our pastor decided to start the Easter Vigil at 7:45, but where I live, sundown wasn’t until after 8, (we finally reached near full dark around the Gloria), is this liturgical abuse, or else some severe problem? I understand that it is not supposed to start until after dark and be completed entirely during the night, ending before sunrise.
That’s sad to hear.Our Easter Vigil began around 8:30 and ended
about 11:45. Many people left before we had even finished the readings. We had 7 readings.
By the time we reached the baptisms and confirmations, half the people had left. By the
time we reached the Liturgy of the Eucharist,
a third of the church was remaining.
Are these Easter and Christmas only Catholics that don’t know what the Easter Vigil is? It was really sad to see people just get up and leave like it was a movie they didn’t like.
How long did yours last?WE only had three readings from the old testament three psalms the epistle and the Gospel.
My mom is from Puerto Rico (born and raised) so I feel free to say this: I hate the bi-lingual vernacular masses.So in my parish, the Easter Vigil Mass is always bilingual.
We had 5 readings (1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, and Epistle) and nobody baptized or received into full communion. Actually, that’s pretty standard for us, we’ve only had one Baptism at the Vigil in the 22 years I’ve been here and one year we had two boys confirmed. Receiving someone into full communion is usually done at a regular Mass and only 3 people that I can remember have been been received since I’ve been here.thequeen:![]()
How long did yours last?WE only had three readings from the old testament three psalms the epistle and the Gospel.
We had 4 and it did not last much (if any) longer than an hour and a half. We didn’t have anybody received into the Church either so both may have contributed to how short it was compared to the times here.
Very sad to hear this.Actually, that’s pretty standard for us, we’ve only had one Baptism at the Vigil in the 22 years I’ve been here and one year we had two boys confirmed. Receiving someone into full communion is usually done at a regular Mass and only 3 people that I can remember have been been received since I’ve been here.
It is sad. But nothing is being done to change it.Phemie:![]()
Very sad to hear this.Actually, that’s pretty standard for us, we’ve only had one Baptism at the Vigil in the 22 years I’ve been here and one year we had two boys confirmed. Receiving someone into full communion is usually done at a regular Mass and only 3 people that I can remember have been been received since I’ve been here.
And a quote from the CDW concerning this rule:The whole celebration of the Paschal Vigil ought to be completed at night , both so that it does not begin before the beginning of night , and that it finishes before dawn of Sunday.
Starting the Easter Vigil mass before true darkness is an abuse. The reasons for starting earlier provided by the pastors for some posters in this thread (more family friendly, trying to get more people to attend, etc.) are poor excuses for violating this rule.
- This rule is to be taken according to its strictest sense . Reprehensible are those abuses and practices which have crept in many places in violation of this ruling, whereby the Easter Vigil is celebrated at the time of day that it is customary to celebrate anticipated Masses.
Nightfall corresponds to evening nautical twilight per Diocese of San Jose.In an effort to make the Easter Vigil more family-friendly this year, our pastor decided to start the Easter Vigil at 7:45, but where I live, sundown wasn’t until after 8, (we finally reached near full dark around the Gloria), is this liturgical abuse, or else some severe problem? I understand that it is not supposed to start until after dark and be completed entirely during the night, ending before sunrise.
Wow, that is really sad. The Easter Vigil Mass is the most important Mass of the liturgical year. And while attendance at our Easter Vigil Masses very from year to year, the church is at the minimum 70% full (200+) and some years like this year, standing-room only. We usually have two to six people being baptized and anywhere from 12 to 24 people being confirmed and occasionally one or two being received into the Catholic Church. And our Easter Vigil choir tends to be extra large because it’s always a combined choir of all the regular choirs that sing at our church.phil19034:![]()
It is sad. But nothing is being done to change it.Phemie:![]()
Very sad to hear this.Actually, that’s pretty standard for us, we’ve only had one Baptism at the Vigil in the 22 years I’ve been here and one year we had two boys confirmed. Receiving someone into full communion is usually done at a regular Mass and only 3 people that I can remember have been been received since I’ve been here.
In fact, not much is being done to stem the exodus from the pews that we’ve seen over the last 15 years or so. If it weren’t for the 70+ members and the Filipinos who’ve immigrated in the last 7 years or so the church would be almost empty.