T
theistgal
Guest
Thread resurrector!I think it would be something like “Well what about Eastern Catholics? They have married priests.”
But yes, that’s the proper boilerplate response.
Thread resurrector!I think it would be something like “Well what about Eastern Catholics? They have married priests.”
East - St. John Chrysostom on continence in marriage:Wherefore [St. Paul] says, “Defraud not one another, unless it be by consent for a season, that you may give yourselves unto prayer.” It is prayer with unusual earnestness which he here means. For if he is forbidding those who have intercourse with one another to pray, how could “pray without ceasing” have any place? It is possible then to live with a wife and yet give heed unto prayer. But by continence prayer is made more perfect. For he did not say merely, “That you may pray;” but, “That you may give yourselves unto it” as though what he speaks of might cause not uncleanness but much occupation… But this I say by way of permission, not of commandment. For I would that all men were even as I myself; in a state of continence.”When Latin Catholics defend celibacy in the priesthood they often cite that the meaning of the priesthood is alter christus- another Christ. Their reasoning is that by giving up a family and the marital act they are suffering just as Christ instructs them to. What is the eastern response to this?
Me??? I merely made reference to the thread to try to avoid duplication, not to revive it.I blame malphono for tempting me.
![]()
Better if a monk teaches it. This very simple prayer has a very deep effect on our soul, if not properly taught by a spiritual father, it may become meaningless to someone who just sees it as a repetitive reciting of a prayer.Would an Eastern Catholic be willing to teach the Jesus Prayer to a Latin Rite Catholic?
Aha! You admit it!made reference to the thread