Eastern Catholic vs. Roman Catholic views

  • Thread starter Thread starter DJLake
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, but aren’t you aware all the time that you’re a sinner even when you can’t remember a specific sin? Is it really all that hard for human beings to find “matter”?

I mean, even if you haven’t committed a sin, there are always the sins of omission (failing to help those in need, etc.).
Isn’t it possible that someone hasn’t committed a sin since his or her last confession? That is why the notion of involuntary and unknown sins would be helpful to making a devotional confession, to receive the graces of the sacrament, if unaware of specific sins at a given time. I do not believe these terms are used in the Catholic Church but maybe in the Catholic Orthodox Churches?
 
Thank you very much for the link. I look forward to reading this.
Your very welcome!

As Eastern Catholics are we not supposed to be everything the Orthodox are…including dogma and doctrine…just in communion with Rome.
 
Isn’t it possible that someone hasn’t committed a sin since his or her last confession?
Yes, but since “even the just man falls 7 times a day” (Proverbs 24:16), I’d want to see their canonization papers. 😃
 
In the Divine Liturgy, we ask for forgiveness for unknown sins. As a Roman Catholic either this concept is not emphasized or I have not come across it. Would Eastern Catholics confess unknown sins? For that matter, to receive the grace of the sacrament, would some Catholics confess unknown sins when matter for confession is lacking? This may be one of the differences I was wondering about.
Hello DJLake.
We have this portion of the Latin mass where we utter these words of the Confiteor 😃

“I confess to almighty God
and to you, my brothers and sisters,
that I have greatly sinned
in my thoughts
and in my words,
in what I have done,
and what I have failed to do.
through my fault,
through my fault,
through my most grievous fault,
therefore, I ask blessed Mary ever virgin,
all the angels and saints,
and you, my brothers and sisters
to pray for me to the Lord, our God.”
 
Can you mention what some of those difference would be?
One difference would be the concept of kneeling ( with or without kneelers ) hehehe 😃

I believe, in the Eastern Churches, kneeling does not happen during worship ( not even in consecration and I wish to emphasize that our Eastern brothers mean not to disrespect our Lord Jesus… In fact, they meant ALL respect for our Lord while standing ) … Please kindly correct me, if I am wrong.

But for the Western Churches, kneeling slowly crept into the consecration portion of the worship (during the 15th century)… Please kindly correct me as well, if I am wrong 😃
 
Also, I learned from the Ukrainian Catholic Catechism by Casimir Kucharek,
that the Latin Church Sacraments are the equivalent of the Eastern Church Holy Mysteries.

Sacraments = Holy Mysteries
Holy Mysteries = Sacraments
 
Eastern Church Solemn Matins = Western Church Midnight Masses/Dawn Masses

Please kindly correct me, if this equation is wrong 🙂
 
Western Sacramentals = Eastern Lesser Mysteries
A snippet of the "Ukrainian Catholic Catechism by Casimir Kucharek

“The Byzantine Church also regards the Gospel Book as the symbol of Christ and they give it exceptional honor. The humblest parish adorns it with gold or silver, even jewels. Preceded by candle bearers, the priest or deacon carries it in solemn procession at every Eucharistic Liturgy, at every Solemn Matins, and around the church on the feast of the parish patron. All Byzantine churches keep it on the front center of the altar (which in turn symbolizes Christ’s throne in heaven), the very place where Christ’s sacred body and precious blood repose at the Divine.”

I believe this is around 70%-85% true for the Western Church as well… (minus the gold, silver, jewels) 😃 right ?
 
Certainly. “Sacrament” = “Sacramentum” (Latin). But why would the Orthodox use Latin?
Sorry about that Peter J. What I meant was,
to the Latin Church it would be called “Sacraments.”
But to Eastern Church it would be called “Holy Mysteries.”
 
Sorry about that Peter J. What I meant was,
to the Latin Church it would be called “Sacraments.”
But to Eastern Church it would be called “Holy Mysteries.”
Don’t apologize, I was agreeing with you. “Sacrament” = “Sacramentum” (Latin), which translated to English would be “Mystery”.
 
Hello DJLake.
We have this portion of the Latin mass where we utter these words of the Confiteor 😃

“I confess to almighty God
and to you, my brothers and sisters,
that I have greatly sinned
in my thoughts
and in my words,
in what I have done,
and what I have failed to do.
through my fault,
through my fault,
through my most grievous fault,
therefore, I ask blessed Mary ever virgin,
all the angels and saints,
and you, my brothers and sisters
to pray for me to the Lord, our God.”
Yes, we are all sinners, but I’m talking about a particular interval of time in which, it is possible to be unaware of having committed a particular sin.
 
Yes, but since “even the just man falls 7 times a day” (Proverbs 24:16), I’d want to see their canonization papers. 😃
I am interested in how sin in defined. It makes sense in terms of involuntary and unknown sins that we are sinning constantly, that is falling short of the ideal, of the perfect will of God. However, I think the RC Church defines sins differently, and does not talk about involuntary or unknown sins.
 
I am interested in how sin in defined. It makes sense in terms of involuntary and unknown sins that we are sinning constantly, that is falling short of the ideal, of the perfect will of God. However, I think the RC Church defines sins differently, and does not talk about involuntary or unknown sins.
Isn’t that what “venial sins” are, though? Sins that you commit almost out of habit, without fully realizing they’re sins?

From the CCC:
“1871 Sin is an utterance, a deed, or a desire contrary to the eternal law (St. Augustine, Faust 22:PL 42, 418). It is an offense against God. It rises up against God in a disobedience contrary to the obedience of Christ.”

I bolded the words “or a desire” because certainly you can have a sinful desire without acting on it - but it may still be a sin even if it’s something you can’t really control.

Does that make more sense?
 
Isn’t that what “venial sins” are, though? Sins that you commit almost out of habit, without fully realizing they’re sins?

From the CCC:
“1871 Sin is an utterance, a deed, or a desire contrary to the eternal law (St. Augustine, Faust 22:PL 42, 418). It is an offense against God. It rises up against God in a disobedience contrary to the obedience of Christ.”

I bolded the words “or a desire” because certainly you can have a sinful desire without acting on it - but it may still be a sin even if it’s something you can’t really control.

Does that make more sense?
A venial sin would be a lesser sin, maybe one of less serious matter, or if there is grave matter, the other two conditions (sufficient reflection and full consent) are lacking. The Catholic Church does not consider it a sin for evil thoughts to come to the mind, so long as one does not entertain the thoughts and tries to dismiss them. Commiting small or venial sins out of habit or vice is still something of which the sinner is aware. This seems totally different from involuntary and unknowable sins, and it makes a great deal of sense to me to be sorry for something which wasn’t even intentional. I suppose it is like being sorry for accidentally hurting somene even when not at fault.
 
A venial sin would be a lesser sin, maybe one of less serious matter, or if there is grave matter, the other two conditions (sufficient reflection and full consent) are lacking. The Catholic Church does not consider it a sin for evil thoughts to come to the mind, so long as one does not entertain the thoughts and tries to dismiss them. Commiting small or venial sins out of habit or vice is still something of which the sinner is aware. This seems totally different from involuntary and unknowable sins, and it makes a great deal of sense to me to be sorry for something which wasn’t even intentional. I suppose it is like being sorry for accidentally hurting somene even when not at fault.
? So tell me, do Western Catholics refrain from saying prayers like the “Hail Mary” (“pray for us sinners”), the Confiteor (“through my fault, through my fault, through my most grevious fault”), the Memorare (“to thee do we come, before thee we stand, sinful and sorrowful”), etc., after going to Confession, because hey, you’re no longer aware of having committed any sins so the words don’t apply to you any more? 😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top