I am not very well versed in Byzantine/Greek theology, but do you find it acceptable to agree that theosis is a process that involves some pain, sacrifice, “crucifixion” etc…? I think that would be sufficient to point to an agreement on “purgatory”.
This was not addressed to me, so excuse me for jumping in, but I would say you could hypothetically say perhaps it would involve pain in the sense of letting go of earthly attachments and human desires, but it wouldn’t be a vengeful, hellfire kind of pain. Theosis is the process of becoming ‘like God’ and drawing near him, that shouldn’t be a punishment kind of painful.
If you don’t accept purgatory, do you think it is heretical? Because it is either points to a reality or it doesn’t. One doesn’t have to formulate the same reality in the same way, but I think Eastern Catholics can admit “purgatory” is an acceptable way of describing a reality. However, we certainly don’t have to use it in our own Churches.
I would say that as the current Latin church describes it, it can be interpreted as simply a descriptive phrase and conjecture about what happens after death, but when you have the hardbent traditionalists who try to claim it is most definitely a place of hellfire (and that Eastern Catholics must adopt this teaching) then that does not seem compatible with Eastern understanding.
You are definitely mistaken on that one.
I would agree, from what I have heard, the Maronites seem the most Latinized, however the UGCC is pretty bad in some areas. But, I do have hope that we are heading in the right direction and reclaiming our true teaching and tradition.
Re: how can I say I am Orthodox in communion with Rome. There was actually a debate on this term on here a while back. Honestly, that is how I describe myself because that is what I believe our vocation is as Byzantine Eastern Catholics, to live and preach the holy Orthodox (Eastern Byzantine) faith while also being within a church in communion with Rome. It is a far from perfect arrangement and there have been many ups and downs over the course of the union, but I continue to pray the Holy Spirit will guide all the churches within the Catholic communion to a deeper understanding of what it means to be in communion so we might imitate the ancient church and hopefully one day restore full communion with the rest of the Eastern Churches. Am I living a pipe dream? Probably. But nothing is impossible with God.
Re: Are our heirarchs wrong? I wouldn’t say that. I have the upmost respect for them, espcially those I have met personally. As Constintine explained, there are many socio-political factors at play with that catechism. Remember that the UGCC has only been above ground for twenty years, there is a lot of maturing to do. It boils down to the fact that our faith does not come from a catechism, it comes from liturgies and the Fathers.