Eastern Catholics and Purgatory

  • Thread starter Thread starter BVMFatima
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
All I wanted was a simple answer… :sad_yes:
The thread basically became a huge debate.
:slapfight::crutches::stretcher:
That happens a lot around here 😉

Answer, from an actual Eastern Catholic, no we do not have ‘purgatory’.

We do pray for the dead and believe in a process of theosis, which begins on earth and is the process of drawing closer to God. We believe this process can continue after death, which some might call a process of purification, but there is no third place of ‘heaven, hell, purgatory’ and you will never hear it mentioned in Eastern theology.
 
That happens a lot around here 😉

Answer, from an actual Eastern Catholic, no we do not have ‘purgatory’.
Then how you do explain that the Ukrainian Catholic catechism released a while back does mention purgatory? Are the hierarchs, who are our pastors and teachers, wrong?

Also, how can you say you are Eastern Catholic and yet identify yourself as “Orthodox (In communion with Rome)”? Not even the Orthodox accept that.
 
griego catolico
And no, I am not.
ewtn.com/library/papaldoc/jp2adtu.htm
catholic.com/quickquestions/are-catholics-to-believe-that-the-cleansing-fire-of-purgatory-is-real-physical-fire
Are the hierarchs, who are our pastors and teachers, wrong?
Yes, it’s all part of a massive conspiracy to destroy the true Eastern faith. They also have a computer with the names of all the faithful Eastern Catholics like Constantine on it. 😃
 
Are the hierarchs, who are our pastors and teachers, wrong?
Yes, it’s all part of a massive conspiracy to destroy the true Eastern faith. They also have a computer with the names of all the faithful Eastern Catholics like Constantine on it. 😃
 
griego catolico

ewtn.com/library/papaldoc/jp2adtu.htm
catholic.com/quickquestions/are-catholics-to-believe-that-the-cleansing-fire-of-purgatory-is-real-physical-fire

Yes, it’s all part of a massive conspiracy to destroy the true Eastern faith. They also have a computer with the names of all the faithful Eastern Catholics like Constantine on it. 😃
None of those applies to us. Not part of our belief. Our whole theology doesn’t revolve around inflicting some kind of pain for someone’s process of purification. We believe in praying for the souls of the departed. That is it. Everything beyond that is speculative.

How about learning the basics of Eastern Theology before telling us what we should and should not believe? Because Purgatory absolutely does not fit Eastern Theology. It isn’t a matter of do we follow the Pope or we’re tryiing to pretend to be Orthodox. Our whole theology is just incompatible to the concept of Purgatory.
 
Then how you do explain that the Ukrainian Catholic catechism released a while back does mention purgatory? Are the hierarchs, who are our pastors and teachers, wrong?
The UGCC admittedly is the most Latinized of all Eastern Catholics, mainly during the time of the Soviet occupation the Major Archbishop was in the Vatican. And they had no seminaries and everyone was educated in the Latin seminary. It is only recently when they have started opening their own theological school that will teach the authentic faith. The Catechism is more of a statement of the maturity of the Church, trying to shore up its bid for Patriarchate status, than trying to de-Latinize the Church. And given that they are aiming to be a Patriarchate by 2020, do you think they’ll ruffle the feathers of Rome right now? Last thing Rome would want is another Patriarch acting like the Melkite Patriarch.
Also, how can you say you are Eastern Catholic and yet identify yourself as “Orthodox (In communion with Rome)”? Not even the Orthodox accept that.
Why do the Orthodox need to accept that, we are not in communion with them? The Orthodox claim they are the true Catholic Church and not the Roman Catholic Church, it has never stopped Roman Catholics from claiming to be Catholic.
 
Constantine,

I am not very well versed in Byzantine/Greek theology, but do you find it acceptable to agree that theosis is a process that involves some pain, sacrifice, “crucifixion” etc…? I think that would be sufficient to point to an agreement on “purgatory”.

If you don’t accept purgatory, do you think it is heretical? Because it is either points to a reality or it doesn’t. One doesn’t have to formulate the same reality in the same way, but I think Eastern Catholics can admit “purgatory” is an acceptable way of describing a reality. However, we certainly don’t have to use it in our own Churches.
The UGCC admittedly is the most Latinized of all Eastern Catholics.
You are definitely mistaken on that one.
 
I am not very well versed in Byzantine/Greek theology, but do you find it acceptable to agree that theosis is a process that involves some pain, sacrifice, “crucifixion” etc…? I think that would be sufficient to point to an agreement on “purgatory”.
This was not addressed to me, so excuse me for jumping in, but I would say you could hypothetically say perhaps it would involve pain in the sense of letting go of earthly attachments and human desires, but it wouldn’t be a vengeful, hellfire kind of pain. Theosis is the process of becoming ‘like God’ and drawing near him, that shouldn’t be a punishment kind of painful.
If you don’t accept purgatory, do you think it is heretical? Because it is either points to a reality or it doesn’t. One doesn’t have to formulate the same reality in the same way, but I think Eastern Catholics can admit “purgatory” is an acceptable way of describing a reality. However, we certainly don’t have to use it in our own Churches.
I would say that as the current Latin church describes it, it can be interpreted as simply a descriptive phrase and conjecture about what happens after death, but when you have the hardbent traditionalists who try to claim it is most definitely a place of hellfire (and that Eastern Catholics must adopt this teaching) then that does not seem compatible with Eastern understanding.
You are definitely mistaken on that one.
I would agree, from what I have heard, the Maronites seem the most Latinized, however the UGCC is pretty bad in some areas. But, I do have hope that we are heading in the right direction and reclaiming our true teaching and tradition.

Re: how can I say I am Orthodox in communion with Rome. There was actually a debate on this term on here a while back. Honestly, that is how I describe myself because that is what I believe our vocation is as Byzantine Eastern Catholics, to live and preach the holy Orthodox (Eastern Byzantine) faith while also being within a church in communion with Rome. It is a far from perfect arrangement and there have been many ups and downs over the course of the union, but I continue to pray the Holy Spirit will guide all the churches within the Catholic communion to a deeper understanding of what it means to be in communion so we might imitate the ancient church and hopefully one day restore full communion with the rest of the Eastern Churches. Am I living a pipe dream? Probably. But nothing is impossible with God.

Re: Are our heirarchs wrong? I wouldn’t say that. I have the upmost respect for them, espcially those I have met personally. As Constintine explained, there are many socio-political factors at play with that catechism. Remember that the UGCC has only been above ground for twenty years, there is a lot of maturing to do. It boils down to the fact that our faith does not come from a catechism, it comes from liturgies and the Fathers.
 
This was not addressed to me, so excuse me for jumping in, but I would say you could hypothetically say perhaps it would involve pain in the sense of letting go of earthly attachments and human desires, but it wouldn’t be a vengeful, hellfire kind of pain. Theosis is the process of becoming ‘like God’ and drawing near him, that shouldn’t be a punishment kind of painful.


.
Latins agree that sanctification/deification is the process of becoming “like God” - that’s the whole point of the sacraments/Christian life!.. but that being said, Scripture is pretty clear that suffering is part of this process. (It is also clear that suffering in and with Christ is to be a joyful experience because it brings us and others closer to Him - this is why the Latin tradition has described purgatory as a period of great suffering and also of great joy - all at once). St. Paul tells us that he rejoices in his sufferings for he “makes up what is lacking in the afflictions of Christ” (Col. 1:24) and that in order to share in the glory of Christ we must first share in His suffering (Romans 8:17)…Jesus teaches us that imperfect, but well meaning, servants will be disciplined with “light beatings” when He returns (Luke 12:47-48)…the book of Hebrews reminds us that God will discipline all of His children (Hebrews 12:11)…
 
The traditional Eastern objections to purgatory were over whether sins which have been forgiven need to be punished by God, and whether those who have died are cleansed by fire. We reject both propositions. Whether Eastern Catholics are able to reject such propositions is another matter, I suppose.
 
None of those applies to us.
The Code of Canon Law for the Eastern Churches applies to you. It doesn’t matter how much you dislike it and try to rationalize it, the Code of Canon Law for the Eastern Churches applies to you and you are bound to believe in Purgatory. There’s no in between position on orthodoxy.
 
ConstantineTG;10127131:
The UGCC admittedly is the most Latinized of all Eastern Catholics,
I disagree, I believe the Maronite Church is.
At their worst, the UGCC and Ruthenian GCC’s were FAR more latinized than the Maronites by comparison to their baseline liturgical texts. Roman vestments, including the maniple, even, in some parishes… merely adding the requisite crosses and icons.

The Maronites have not delatinized nearly as much, and their baseline is much closer to the Latin, making for an appearance of having been much more latinized than they were.
 
Constantine,

I am not very well versed in Byzantine/Greek theology, but do you find it acceptable to agree that theosis is a process that involves some pain, sacrifice, “crucifixion” etc…? I think that would be sufficient to point to an agreement on “purgatory”.
No. Theosis teaches a continuing and ever increasing communion with God. There is growth even in heaven, and because God is infinite, the growth will never end. This growth is not brought about by pain and suffering because you are already in communion with God. Thus any further purification is achieved by growth in love with God and not by pain and/or suffering.
If you don’t accept purgatory, do you think it is heretical? Because it is either points to a reality or it doesn’t. One doesn’t have to formulate the same reality in the same way, but I think Eastern Catholics can admit “purgatory” is an acceptable way of describing a reality. However, we certainly don’t have to use it in our own Churches.
Purgatory certainly fits the Roman understanding of salvation. Whether it is consistent with Patristic teaching or not is beyond my pay grade though.
You are definitely mistaken on that one.
Really? Do you know of any Eastern Catholic Church that willfully remade their Church into the Roman Catholic Church, part of which is so that they won’t be persecuted by the Soviets. But also, like I said, they lost all their schools for the better part of a century. All the formation of their priests was done at Latin seminaries.
 
The Code of Canon Law for the Eastern Churches applies to you. It doesn’t matter how much you dislike it and try to rationalize it, the Code of Canon Law for the Eastern Churches applies to you and you are bound to believe in Purgatory. There’s no in between position on orthodoxy.
Purgatory is mentioned in the CCEO?

And you know what, if you want to prove a point, maybe you can provide something better than your personal assumptions.
 
At their worst, the UGCC and Ruthenian GCC’s were FAR more latinized than the Maronites by comparison to their baseline liturgical texts. Roman vestments, including the maniple, even, in some parishes… merely adding the requisite crosses and icons.

The Maronites have not delatinized nearly as much, and their baseline is much closer to the Latin, making for an appearance of having been much more latinized than they were.
Yes, our bishops of not so long ago still have pictures in and around our Eparchy wearing Latin vestments and Latin episcopal clothing. And a lot of our parishes still do not have their iconostas back. Even the candle arrangements on the altars are mostly Latin rather than the Byzantine 7 candles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top