M
Merrick
Guest
I’ve heard that Eastern Catholics still refer to the Body and Blood in the Sacrament as bread and wine sometimes and in the liturgy? Is this true?
I don’t have a problem affirming change in the bread and wine or that it is the body and blood but I am very uncomfortable when people say the bread and wine are annihilated or cease to exist. This does not seem right, not how God treats the creation He loves. If there is not a thingness we can call bread and a thingness we can call wine, in the Incarnation why can we not say that the humanity was transformed into God and only the accidents remained? It would be the same concept.
How do the Eastern Catholics view this?
I don’t have a problem affirming change in the bread and wine or that it is the body and blood but I am very uncomfortable when people say the bread and wine are annihilated or cease to exist. This does not seem right, not how God treats the creation He loves. If there is not a thingness we can call bread and a thingness we can call wine, in the Incarnation why can we not say that the humanity was transformed into God and only the accidents remained? It would be the same concept.
How do the Eastern Catholics view this?