Eastern Orthodox Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter mwmroe
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
you might want to hop on over to the Eastern Catholic board here…I posted a question very similar to yours there:

here is the linkforums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=380497

I also agree with you in that I think that the Orthodox don’t think too highly of the Catholics but I have found more Catholics who think very highly of the Orthodox

Edit: there are lots of differences btween the Eastern Orthodox and the Latin/Roman Catholic Church…but the differences between the Orthodox and the various Eastern Churches are far less…again I’m a novice at Eastern Catholicism and someone more knowledgeable than I would be able to explain it better 🙂
Thank you for your post and the link. I jumped over to Eastern Catholicism board and posted my question there.

God Bless,
Mark
 
I haven’t found, although have looked for, a book written by Catholics regarding the Orthodox Faith - specifically something the reverse of Clark Carlton’s book called The Truth What Every Roman Catholic Should Know About the Orthodox Church.

I have learned that the reason for this is because the Catholic Church as a whole sees Orthodox Christians as a part of The Church in such a close relation, that only the Patriarchs of the Orthodox and the Pope (and the Eastern Catholic Patriarchs) are to really dig into possible reunification. The Catholic Church recognizes the validity of all of the Sacraments/Mysteries of the Orthodox Church as well as their Apostolic Succession. The Catholic Church, just as she’s welcomed them in the past is ready to welcome home the remaining Orthodox Churches.

For me personally, it is a bit confusing because I am a Greek Orthodox Christian, but have come back to the Catholic Church. I am told that as a Greek Orthodox Christian, I can receive validly the Sacraments in the Roman Catholic Church - the Roman Catholic Code of Canon Law allows for this. I consider myself Catholic, but according to the Catholic Church, I’m an Orthodox Christian - unless the Patriarch of Constantinople (since I’m Greek Orthodox) reunites with the Pope of Rome I remain Orthodox - according to Catholic Teaching, but according to Orthodox Teaching, I am now a heretic.

I wonder if I have another child, will the Catholic Church then Chrismate my infant with Baptism, Confirmation and Holy Eucharist since they still consider me Orthodox and that’s what the Orthodox do, or will my baby be forbidden all but Baptism? 🤷

When I became Orthodox, I was brought into the Church through Chrismation. I would have thought coming back to the Catholic Church would be somewhat similar.

I have a video of the Pope visiting the Patriarch of Constantinople. The Patriarch held a Divine Liturgy and the Pope was with him in the Bishop’s Chair. At some point our two Churches will be fully united. 😃
Thank you for your comments. It can be so confusing. I wish you the best. And I too hope the two Churches will be united in love someday.

God Bless,
Mark
 
Plus the Greek Catholic Priest made it clear to me that if I attended his Church to receive the Sacraments, I would not be allowed to attend the Roman Catholic Church…
It appears that the priest assumed you had taken him to be your spiritual director.

That would be in keeping with his function as your pastor. His instruction to you may have had it’s origin in something you told him.
 
The Catholic Church recognizes the validity of all of the Sacraments/Mysteries of the Orthodox Church as well as their Apostolic Succession. The Catholic Church, just as she’s welcomed them in the past is ready to welcome home the remaining Orthodox Churches.
What is not usually made clear is that this invitation is conditional: The Orthodox are expected to add new dogmas to their teaching.

What is true is that the Orthodox church teaches nothing that the Roman Catholic church feels is heretical.
For me personally, it is a bit confusing because I am a Greek Orthodox Christian, but have come back to the Catholic Church. I am told that as a Greek Orthodox Christian, I can receive validly the Sacraments in the Roman Catholic Church - the Roman Catholic Code of Canon Law allows for this. I consider myself Catholic, but according to the Catholic Church, I’m an Orthodox Christian - -]unless the Patriarch of Constantinople (since I’m Greek Orthodox) reunites with the Pope of Rome I remain Orthodox/-] - according to Catholic Teaching, but according to Orthodox Teaching, I am now a heretic.
Please understand that this is the early discipline of the church.

To commune with someone actually means that you are in agreement with the doctrines taught there. It signifies agreement. If one communed in an Arian church (why would anyone want to? :confused:) one was considered for all practical purposes an Ariaqn, or in agreement with Arian thought. If one communed in a Donatist church, likewise. If one communed in a Marcionite church, the same. This is the discipline of the early church.

One does not commune with heretics. It means one is automatically excommunicated, at the very least for disobedience. As an Orthodox Christian, one must seek and receive the approval of the bishop before approaching a non-Orthodox priest for the sacrament. The Catholic church knows this and makes it clear in it’s own instructions.

You would have the same problem with the Catholic church if you went to an Anglican, Lutheran or Assemblies of God parish for communion. I think if you petitioned the Catholic bishop for permission to receive the Eucharist in a Protestant church, the chancery would usually fire off a quick letter refusing your request, and explaining why. It would be a “catechetical opportunity” not to be missed.

If you have the prior approval of your Orthodox bishop, you may commune in the Catholic church and consider yourself Orthodox. In unusual circumstances, this may be possible. If you do not have this approval, or if you no longer consider an Orthodox bishop to be your bishop you might just as well not refer to yourself as Orthodox any more.

According to the Canons of the Catholic church, if you have converted you are automatically ascribed to the corresponding eastern Catholic church (and the local EC episcopal authority). (I realize that you already know this.) That means the Catholic church does not really consider you Orthodox anymore. You are not a visiting Orthodox with your bishop’s permission to commune, you are (as you say) a Catholic… with a Catholic bishop.
I wonder if I have another child, will the Catholic Church then Chrismate my infant with Baptism, Confirmation and Holy Eucharist since they still consider me Orthodox and that’s what the Orthodox do, or will my baby be forbidden all but Baptism? 🤷
It depends upon the canonical ascription of your husband, presumably. The children will take on the canonical ascription of the father. If the father is, Latin, so is the child. If the father is Orthodox but agrees to raise the children as Catholic, the child will be EC. If the father is neither Catholic nor Orthodox I believe the child’s ascription will follow upon your ascription.

Also, the Latin parish will not normally be able to Chrismate your next child, because the priest is not the usual agent for that sacrament in the Latin church. If you want that done at the time of baptism you would have to go back to the Eastern Catholic priest, and if you (or your husband) were now somehow considered to be under control of the Latin bishop, the EC priest would presumably need permission from the local Latin bishop to proceed.
When I became Orthodox, I was brought into the Church through Chrismation. I would have thought coming back to the Catholic Church would be somewhat similar.
The Orthodox consider Chrismation as a repeatable sacrament. It is a healing sacrament.

When I became Orthodox my bishop decided that I would be received through confession and communion. I decided that I would prefer to be Chrismated with the rest of the catechumens, and so I was.
I have a video of the Pope visiting the Patriarch of Constantinople…
I have noticed that the Pope’s seem to treat Orthodox patriarchs with a great deal more deference than they give to eastern Catholic patriarchs.
 
Hello Monica,
The Catholic Church recognizes the validity of all of the Sacraments/Mysteries of the Orthodox Church as well as their Apostolic Succession. The Catholic Church, just as she’s welcomed them in the past is ready to welcome home the remaining Orthodox Churches.
What is not usually made clear is that this invitation is conditional: The Orthodox are expected to add new dogmas to their teaching.

What is true is that the Orthodox church teaches nothing that the Roman Catholic church feels is heretical. Nonetheless, Pope Benedict did find an opportunity to call the Orthodox churches “defective”. The feeling is mutual.
For me personally, it is a bit confusing because I am a Greek Orthodox Christian, but have come back to the Catholic Church. I am told that as a Greek Orthodox Christian, I can receive validly the Sacraments in the Roman Catholic Church - the Roman Catholic Code of Canon Law allows for this. I consider myself Catholic, but according to the Catholic Church, I’m an Orthodox Christian - -]unless the Patriarch of Constantinople (since I’m Greek Orthodox) reunites with the Pope of Rome I remain Orthodox/-] - according to Catholic Teaching, but according to Orthodox Teaching, I am now a heretic.
Please understand that this is the early discipline of the church.

To commune with someone actually means that you are in agreement with the doctrines taught there. It signifies agreement. If one communed in an Arian church (why would anyone want to? :confused:) one was considered for all practical purposes an Arian, in other words in agreement with Arian thought. If one communed in a Donatist church, likewise. If one communed in a Marcionite church, the same, and so it goes… This is the discipline of the early church.

One does not commune with heretics. It means one is automatically excommunicated, at the very least for disobedience. As an Orthodox Christian, one must seek and receive the approval of the bishop before approaching a non-Orthodox priest for the sacrament. The Catholic church knows this and makes it clear in it’s own instructions.
Because Catholics believe that the celebration of the Eucharist is a sign of the reality of the oneness of faith, life, and worship, members of those churches with whom we are not yet fully united are ordinarily not admitted to Holy Communion. Eucharistic sharing in exceptional circumstances by other Christians requires permission according to the directives of the diocesan bishop and the provisions of canon law (canon 844 § 4).
Members of the Orthodox Churches, the Assyrian Church of the East, and the Polish National Catholic Church are urged to respect the discipline of their own Churches. According to Roman Catholic discipline, the Code of Canon Law does not object to the reception of communion by Christians of these Churches (canon 844 § 3).
You would have the same problem with the Catholic church if you went to an Anglican, Lutheran or Assemblies of God parish for communion. I think if you petitioned the Catholic bishop for permission to receive the Eucharist in a Protestant church, the chancery would usually fire off a quick letter refusing your request, and explaining why. It would be a “catechetical opportunity” not to be missed.

If you have the prior approval of your Orthodox bishop, you may commune in the Catholic church and consider yourself Orthodox. In unusual circumstances, this may be possible. If you do not have this approval, or if you no longer consider an Orthodox bishop to be your bishop you might just as well not refer to yourself as Orthodox any more.

According to the Canons of the Catholic church, if you have converted you are automatically ascribed to the corresponding eastern Catholic church (and the local EC episcopal authority). (I realize that you already know this.) That means the Catholic church does not really consider you Orthodox anymore. You are not a visiting Orthodox with your bishop’s permission to commune, you are (as you say) a Catholic… with a Catholic bishop.
I wonder if I have another child, will the Catholic Church then Chrismate my infant with Baptism, Confirmation and Holy Eucharist since they still consider me Orthodox and that’s what the Orthodox do, or will my baby be forbidden all but Baptism? 🤷
It depends upon the canonical ascription of your husband, presumably. The children will take on the canonical ascription of the father. If the father is, Latin, so is the child. If the father is Orthodox but agrees to raise the children as Catholic, the child will be EC. If the father is neither Catholic nor Orthodox I believe the child’s ascription will follow upon your ascription.

Also, the Latin parish will not normally be able to Chrismate your next child, because the priest is not the usual agent for that sacrament in the Latin church. If you want that done at the time of baptism you would have to go back to the Eastern Catholic priest, and if you (or your husband) were now somehow considered to be under control of the Latin bishop, the EC priest would presumably need permission from the local Latin bishop to proceed.
When I became Orthodox, I was brought into the Church through Chrismation. I would have thought coming back to the Catholic Church would be somewhat similar.
The Orthodox consider Chrismation as a repeatable sacrament. It is a healing sacrament.

The Latin church (and following upon Latin thought I guess the EC too) consider that Chrismation (Confirmation) not a repeatable sacrament, so if you have already been confirmed once they cannot do it again or use it to receive anyone who has been validly confirmed, either a returning Catholic or an Orthodox.

The Orthodox, for their part, will use Chrismation again on previously Chrismated Orthodox or Catholics as the need arises.

When I became Orthodox my bishop decided that I would be received through confession and communion. I decided that I would prefer to be Chrismated with the rest of the catechumens, and so I was.
I have a video of the Pope visiting the Patriarch of Constantinople…
I have noticed that the Pope’s seem to treat Orthodox patriarchs with a great deal more deference than they give to eastern Catholic patriarchs.
 
Hello Monica,
The Catholic Church recognizes the validity of all of the Sacraments/Mysteries of the Orthodox Church as well as their Apostolic Succession. The Catholic Church, just as she’s welcomed them in the past is ready to welcome home the remaining Orthodox Churches.
What is not usually made clear is that this invitation is conditional: The Orthodox are expected to add new dogmas to their teaching.

What is true is that the Orthodox church teaches nothing that the Roman Catholic church feels is heretical. Nonetheless, Pope Benedict did find an opportunity to call the Orthodox churches “defective”. The feeling is mutual.
For me personally, it is a bit confusing because I am a Greek Orthodox Christian, but have come back to the Catholic Church. I am told that as a Greek Orthodox Christian, I can receive validly the Sacraments in the Roman Catholic Church - the Roman Catholic Code of Canon Law allows for this. I consider myself Catholic, but according to the Catholic Church, I’m an Orthodox Christian - -]unless the Patriarch of Constantinople (since I’m Greek Orthodox) reunites with the Pope of Rome I remain Orthodox/-] - according to Catholic Teaching, but according to Orthodox Teaching, I am now a heretic.
Please understand that this is the early discipline of the church.

To commune with someone actually means that you are in agreement with the doctrines taught there. It signifies agreement. If one communed in an Arian church (why would anyone want to? :confused:) one was considered for all practical purposes an Arian, in other words in agreement with Arian thought. If one communed in a Donatist church, likewise. If one communed in a Marcionite church, the same, and so it goes… This is the discipline of the early church.

One does not commune with heretics. It means one is automatically excommunicated, at the very least for disobedience. As an Orthodox Christian, one must seek and receive the approval of the bishop before approaching a non-Orthodox priest for the sacrament. The Catholic church knows this and makes it clear in it’s own instructions.
Because Catholics believe that the celebration of the Eucharist is a sign of the reality of the oneness of faith, life, and worship, members of those churches with whom we are not yet fully united are ordinarily not admitted to Holy Communion. Eucharistic sharing in exceptional circumstances by other Christians requires permission according to the directives of the diocesan bishop and the provisions of canon law (canon 844 § 4)
Members of the Orthodox Churches, the Assyrian Church of the East, and the Polish National Catholic Church are urged to respect the discipline of their own Churches. According to Roman Catholic discipline, the Code of Canon Law does not object to the reception of communion by Christians of these Churches. (canon 844 § 3).
You would have the same problem with the Catholic church if you went to an Anglican, Lutheran or Assemblies of God parish for communion. I think if you petitioned the Catholic bishop for permission to receive the Eucharist in a Protestant church, the chancery would usually fire off a quick letter refusing your request, and explaining why. It would be a “catechetical opportunity” not to be missed.

If you have the prior approval of your Orthodox bishop, you may commune in the Catholic church and consider yourself Orthodox. In unusual circumstances, this may be possible. If you do not have this approval, or if you no longer consider an Orthodox bishop to be your bishop you might just as well not refer to yourself as Orthodox any more.

According to the Canons of the Catholic church, if you have converted you are automatically ascribed to the corresponding eastern Catholic church (and the local EC episcopal authority). (I realize that you already know this.) That means the Catholic church does not really consider you Orthodox anymore. You are not a visiting Orthodox with your bishop’s permission to commune, you are (as you say) a Catholic… with a Catholic bishop.
I wonder if I have another child, will the Catholic Church then Chrismate my infant with Baptism, Confirmation and Holy Eucharist since they still consider me Orthodox and that’s what the Orthodox do, or will my baby be forbidden all but Baptism? 🤷
It depends upon the canonical ascription of your husband, presumably. The children will take on the canonical ascription of the father. If the father is, Latin, so is the child. If the father is Orthodox but agrees to raise the children as Catholic, the child will be EC. If the father is neither Catholic nor Orthodox I believe the child’s ascription will follow upon your ascription.

Also, the Latin parish will not normally be able to Chrismate your next child, because the priest is not the usual agent for that sacrament in the Latin church. If you want that done at the time of baptism you would have to go back to the Eastern Catholic priest, and if you (or your husband) were now somehow considered to be under control of the Latin bishop, the EC priest would presumably need permission from the local Latin bishop to proceed.
When I became Orthodox, I was brought into the Church through Chrismation. I would have thought coming back to the Catholic Church would be somewhat similar.
The Orthodox consider Chrismation as a repeatable sacrament. It is a healing sacrament.

The Latin church (and following upon Latin thought I guess the EC too) consider that Chrismation (Confirmation) not a repeatable sacrament, so if you have already been confirmed once they cannot do it again or use it to receive anyone who has been validly confirmed, either a returning Catholic or an Orthodox.

The Orthodox, for their part, will use Chrismation again on previously Chrismated Orthodox or Catholics as the need arises.

When I became Orthodox my bishop decided that I would be received through confession and communion. I decided that I would prefer to be Chrismated with the rest of the catechumens, and so I was.
I have a video of the Pope visiting the Patriarch of Constantinople…
I have noticed that the Pope’s seem to treat Orthodox patriarchs with a great deal more deference than they give to eastern Catholic patriarchs.
 
[Members of the Orthodox Churches, the Assyrian Church of the East, and the Polish National Catholic Church are urged to respect the discipline of their own Churches. According to Roman Catholic discipline, the Code of Canon Law does not object to the reception of communion by Christians of these Churches. (canon 844 § 3). /QUOTE]

Your quoting of the Code of Canon Law 884§3. is in accuate.

Please refer to: vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P2T.HTM it actually reads:

Catholic ministers administer the sacraments of penance, Eucharist, and anointing of the sick** licitly to members of Eastern Churches which do not have full communion with the Catholic Church if they seek such on their own accord and are properly disposed.** This is also valid for members of other Churches which in the judgment of the Apostolic See are in the same condition in regard to the sacraments as these Eastern Churches.”

I’ve added the bolding.
 
40.png
Hesychios:
You also misquoted the Code of Canon Law 844§4, which correctly reads:

“If the danger of death is present or if, in the judgment of the diocesan bishop or conference of bishops, some other grave necessity urges it, Catholic ministers administer these same sacraments licitly also to other Christians not having full communion with the Catholic Church, who cannot approach a minister of their own community and who seek such on their own accord, provided that they manifest Catholic faith in respect to these sacraments and are properly disposed.”
 
Your quoting of the Code of Canon Law 884§3. is in accuate.
You also misquoted the Code of Canon Law 844§4, which correctly reads:
I don’t see the point you are trying to make. Could you please elaborate? I placed the text there as a convenience to anyone who might wish to read it.

Your statement that the canons are “misquoted” is debatable, I don’t do my own translations, and I do not modify the texts I quote for any reason except to abbreviate.

My source is here. What does it mean when the USCCB website and the Vatican website are publishing two different things under the same titles? Which text do you see printed in your Sunday Missalette?

You might wish to inform them of their errors.

Michael
 
Hello Monica,
… Pope Benedict did find an opportunity to call the Orthodox churches “defective”. The feeling is mutual. Please understand that this is the early discipline of the church.
Where can you find the **quoted ** remark about the Orthodox Church?

What do you mean to imply about Pope Benedict with your “find an opportunity” phrase?
 
Where can you find the **quoted ** remark about the Orthodox Church?
Red Pope Benedicts’ CLARIFICATION ON THE DOCTRINE OF THE CHURCH
What do you mean to imply about Pope Benedict with your “find an opportunity” phrase?
The same thing I would imply if I said you found an opportunity to ask me these questions.
 
I don’t see the point you are trying to make. Could you please elaborate? I placed the text there as a convenience to anyone who might wish to read it.

Your statement that the canons are “misquoted” is debatable, I don’t do my own translations, and I do not modify the texts I quote for any reason except to abbreviate.

My source is here. What does it mean when the USCCB website and the Vatican website are publishing two different things under the same titles? Which text do you see printed in your Sunday Missalette?

You might wish to inform them of their errors.

Michael
The Vatican Website: www.vatican.va has the official English Version of the current Code of Canon Law.

There is no reason to go anywhere else for official Catholic Documents: Vatican II Docs, the Bible, the Code of Canon Law, the Catechism of the Catholic Church…if you want the official documents go directly to the source.

The website you are refering to is the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Your reference is from the Committee on Divine Worship and in a Questions and Answers Section. In that answer, they do not quote the Code of Canon Law, but in part of their response they do list the Code’s # so that one may do additional research by reading it for themselves as is related to their answer topic.

I can see why someone could be confused by it. From now on, you may want to visit vatican.va to read any official Catholic documents that may be referenced in any other Catholic Material.
 
A Russian Orthodox priest?:confused:
Yep. So you can understand my confusion at the time and why it simply made sense for me to go back to the Orthodox Church through the Mystery of Confession very soon after.

It was about a year later that I began to see some of why St. John Chrysostom said which again brought me out of the Orthodox Church and to Rome. I’ll have to paraphrase as I don’t have it in front of me “The Bishop of Rome has jurisdiction over the Entire Universe” as this directly is against what we Orthodox Christians believe and yet we honor that Saint so highly because we know he was not a heretic, yet that’s what he wrote and taught! I had to become Catholic, since it is the Catholic Church that still teaches that.

If that’s true and the Catholics have that right. Then they’d also have the “Filioque” issue right since the Bishop of Rome then has the Authority to add it to the Creed outside of a Council. And it was over that issue that we really separated from the Catholics to begin with, so we should reunite over those issues too.
 
Yep. So you can understand my confusion at the time and why it simply made sense for me to go back to the Orthodox Church through the Mystery of Confession very soon after.

It was about a year later that I began to see some of why St. John Chrysostom said which again brought me out of the Orthodox Church and to Rome. I’ll have to paraphrase as I don’t have it in front of me “The Bishop of Rome has jurisdiction over the Entire Universe” as this directly is against what we Orthodox Christians believe and yet we honor that Saint so highly because we know he was not a heretic, yet that’s what he wrote and taught! I had to become Catholic, since it is the Catholic Church that still teaches that.

If that’s true and the Catholics have that right. Then they’d also have the “Filioque” issue right since the Bishop of Rome then has the Authority to add it to the Creed outside of a Council. And it was over that issue that we really separated from the Catholics to begin with, so we should reunite over those issues too.
Pishposh, balderdash, and poppycock!🙂 From the Orthodox standpoint (pun :p) that would be an extreme paraphrase at best.😦

In Christ,
Andrew
 
Pishposh, balderdash, and poppycock!🙂 From the Orthodox standpoint (pun :p) that would be an extreme paraphrase at best.😦

In Christ,
Andrew
You’d be surprised! I will probably not have computer access again 'til next Monday, unless I can figure out how to do it on my phone. But I will give you the exact quote asap.
 
The Vatican Website: www.vatican.va has the official English Version of the current Code of Canon Law.

There is no reason to go anywhere else for official Catholic Documents: Vatican II Docs, the Bible, the Code of Canon Law, the Catechism of the Catholic Church…if you want the official documents go directly to the source.
How is this relevant to what I posted… are you suggesting that the USCCB is wrong in what they state?

Are you telling me that the USCCB is an unreliable source for information about the Catholic church, and can be discounted?

I remember when the Vatican did not have a website, we read the books 😃 .
The website you are refering to is the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Your reference is from the Committee on Divine Worship and in a Questions and Answers Section. In that answer, they do not quote the Code of Canon Law, but in part of their response they do list the Code’s # so that one may do additional research by reading it for themselves as is related to their answer topic.
So, what is published in your local parish missalette?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top