Eastern-rite Pope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter David_Goliath
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

David_Goliath

Guest
Is it possible for an Eastern-rite Catholic to ever be Pope?
Please enlighten me if this has ever happened; as far as I know, it hasn’t.

Thank you.
 
Is it possible for an Eastern-rite Catholic to ever be Pope?
Technically, the Church can elect ANYONE Pope. You don’t even have to be Catholic (or Christian). Once you accept the Office and are ordained Bishop (after being Baptized, if necessary) then you become Pope. Of course, as a practical matter, this would never happen. Not in modern times, anyway.

If you’re talking about Eastern rites in communion with the Holy See then nothing prevents someone from becoming Pope. There’s no rule that Popes can only be Latin-rite. But it is unlikely.

While the Church has had many Greek Popes, obviously nobody in the Greek Orthodox Church would be considered.
 
Technically, the Church can elect ANYONE Pope. You don’t even have to be Catholic (or Christian). Once you accept the Office and are ordained Bishop (after being Baptized, if necessary) then you become Pope. Of course, as a practical matter, this would never happen. Not in modern times, anyway.
Actually, the USCCB says:
Technically, any baptized Catholic man who is not a heretic, or in schism, or notorious for simony can be elected pope.
I don’t find that in Canon Law, though. This may be a statement of common sense rather than a statement of doctrine.
 
Are all members of the College of Cardinals currently of the Latin rite? If so, doesn’t that limit the Papacy to Latin rite members?
 
  1. Some cardinals are Patriarchs and bishops from other Rites beside the Latin Rites. Also, don’t forget that the bishop of Milan is the head of the Ambrosian Rite, Spanish and Portuguese bishops do Mozarabic and Braganza Rites, etc.
Catholic-hierarchy.org is your go-to site for current and historical cardinal, patriarch, and bishop info.
  1. Cardinals aren’t bound to vote for just cardinals.
 
Is it possible for an Eastern-rite Catholic to ever be Pope?
Please enlighten me if this has ever happened; as far as I know, it hasn’t.

Thank you.
Eastern Catholics have been pope before, but I think that was before they were called separate rites. St. Peter was from an Eastern Catholic Church originally, if you look at it just from a geographical perspective. Have you ever heard of the Byzantine Papacy? That’s a name historians give to the popes from 537 to 752 A.D., and I think all the popes between those dates came from Eastern Catholic Churches. It is my understanding that those popes would have known Greek and celebrated the Byzantine liturgy.
 
Alexandrian tradition -
Coptic Catholics: (non-voting) Patriarch Emeritus Antonios Cardinal Naguib.

Byzantine tradition -
Italo-Albanese Catholics: Apostolic Administrator Paolo Cardinal Romeo
Romanian Catholics: (non-voting) Lucian Mureşan, Cardinal, Major Archbishop

Chaldean tradition:
Syro-Malabar Catholics: George Alencherry, Cardinal, Major Archbishop

Antiochian tradition:
Maronite Catholics: Béchara Boutros Raï, O.M.M., Cardinal, Patriarch
(non-voting) Nasrallah Pierre Cardinal Sfeir, Patriarch Emeritus
Syro-Malankara Catholics: Baselios Cleemis (Isaac) Thottunkal, Cardinal, Major Archbishop

Armenian tradition:
Armenian Catholics: No current cardinals.

Non-voting cardinals are any cardinals over the age limit of 80.

A lot of Eastern groups are apparently up for new cardinals soon, or are between bishops or patriarchs for various reasons. I haven’t listed which churches have had cardinals in the past and don’t have them now, or which churches have never yet had cardinals. So there are many rites not listed above.
 
Technically, the Church can elect ANYONE Pope. You don’t even have to be Catholic (or Christian). Once you accept the Office and are ordained Bishop (after being Baptized, if necessary) then you become Pope. Of course, as a practical matter, this would never happen. Not in modern times, anyway.
No. First, you have to be a male because you have to be ordained because as the Pope you’re also the Bishop of Rome. To be ordained you have to be a Catholic Christian in good standing.
If you’re talking about Eastern rites in communion with the Holy See then nothing prevents someone from becoming Pope. There’s no rule that Popes can only be Latin-rite. But it is unlikely.

While the Church has had many Greek Popes, obviously nobody in the Greek Orthodox Church would be considered.
A bishop could certainly come from the Eastern Half of the Catholic Church but as the Bishop of Rome, His Eastern identity would be lost.
 
He could be bi-ritual. Technically. It would be weird, but doable.

Canon law guys would love it.
 
I’m of the belief that the Pope should always be a Latin. He is the bishop of Rome after all.
However I am open to an eastern Pope as long as he practices the western traditions when Pope. I want an African Pope next actually. Cardinal Peter Turkson to be precise.

I’m also of the believe in the reverse that eastern Patriarchs ans bishops should be easterners

I also believe tha jurisdictionally :

The Pope should oversee the whole Church via his primacy and oversee Europe ans the Americas as a patriarch . The Americas should also be overseen by maybe 2-4 representatives of the pope to watch over north and south america.
The Antiochan Patriarchs should be united and there should only be one (with maybe two other bishops acting as overseers for those traditions that the patriarch is not from) and he should oversee the the middle east.
The Patriarch of Alexandria should oversee the church of Africa and maybe have vicars in all 4 corners of Africa to help him.
The Chaldean Patriarch should oversee the churches of Asia and the far east
 
I want an African Pope next actually. Cardinal Peter Turkson to be precise.
I want whomever the Holy Spirit guides the College of Cardinals to elect. Whether the next pope is Latin or Eastern, Black or White, or any other descriptor we can come up with does not matter to me much. It will be who God wants and that is all that matters.
 
A bishop could certainly come from the Eastern Half of the Catholic Church but as the Bishop of Rome, His Eastern identity would be lost.
He could be bi-ritual. Technically. It would be weird, but doable.

Canon law guys would love it.
The Pope, whatever Rite he is originally from, as head of the Universal Church can celebrate mass/divine liturgy according to any rite he wishes. He doesn’t “need” be to bi-ritual, the office of the Papacy allows this. It is true that as the bishop of Rome, he’ll now have an episcopal see in the Latin rite of the Church, but if he so wishes he could continue celebrating divine liturgy/mass as in his original rite – not that it’d be the most ideal thing to do.
 
I want whomever the Holy Spirit guides the College of Cardinals to elect. Whether the next pope is Latin or Eastern, Black or White, or any other descriptor we can come up with does not matter to me much. It will be who God wants and that is all that matters.
Thats not actually how conclaves work. But for th most part I agree with you. But I do have my favourites
 
Technically speaking as well, our very first Pope was Eastern-rite.
There were no rites back then. Sure he was an easterner, but is not the Latin rite, more specifically the Roman rite, not directly from him? He taught the Romans the liturgy and the faith. Unless in reality we are eastern too.
 
There were no rites back then. Sure he was an easterner, but is not the Latin rite, more specifically the Roman rite, not directly from him? He taught the Romans the liturgy and the faith. Unless in reality we are eastern too.
Did they celebrate the Eucharist?

Then they had a rite.
 
Did they celebrate the Eucharist?

Then they had a rite.
Rites are ways of celebrating the Eucharist. There may have been one rite in the 1st century (as described in the last supper, the book of Acts and the Didache) and over time, through cultures and other influences, the one rite became many rites which in reality are different expressions of the original apostolic rite of the last supper. Thats why I say in the beginning the were no rites (Roman, Mazorabic, byzantine, Syriac etc or Eastern vs Western) as we understand them today… Just a standard liturgy which all practiced.

Thus it is incorrect to say St Peter was eastern rite as in reality at the time, there was no eastern vs western rite. Those hadn’t developed yet. All practiced a liturgy as described in the Didache and Acts. Only over a few centuries did eastern vs western, or rather, cultural rites develop from the first century liturgy of the apostolic period.
 
I witnessed in passing coverage of the Conclaves that resulted in Popes Benedict XVI and Francis; all Cardinals wore the same red outfit. Is that outfit a Latin rite custom? Did the eastern rite Cardinals participate in these elections?
 
I witnessed in passing coverage of the Conclaves that resulted in Popes Benedict XVI and Francis; all Cardinals wore the same red outfit. Is that outfit a Latin rite custom? Did the eastern rite Cardinals participate in these elections?
Two examples:
His Beatitude Cardinal Bechara Boutros RAÏ, O.M.M., Patriarch of Antioch of the Maronites was seated next to Pope Emertus Benedict XVI and can be seen next to and slightly behind him here wearing a red cassock/Exorason/Jibbee, and a clearer shot of him alone.

Syro-Malankara cardinal, Moran Mor Baselios Cardinal Cleemi can be seen in black with a touch of red on his head in this earlier thread A new Cardinal with Black dress instead of Red and attached below.

His Eminence Moran Mor Baselios can also be seen in a smaller picture in this article
Could the Catholic Church Choose a Middle Eastern Pope? Part I: Current Prospects
 
Spanish …] bishops do Mozarabic …] Rites …]
Actually, the identification, within Spain, of bishops who have this twofold Roman/Hispano-Mozarabic nature is more vague than it is in the Eastern rites, as only the Archdiocese of Toledo (and, to a somewhat lesser extent, Tarragona and Seville) has maintained this rite as proper to itself, whose Metropolitan Archbishop and Primate of Spain is the Superior Responsible for the Rite, now Mons. Rodríguez Plaza; this is attested, for instance, by the eighteen Councils of Toledo. This also occurs because, as said by the Praenotanda of the Missale Hispano-Mozarabicum (Hispano-Mozarabic Missal) in n. 160: “Within the jurisdictional area of the Spanish Episcopal Conference, the obtention of the permission for the extraordinary celebration of the Mass in the Hispano-Mozarabic Rite shall be requested to the Ordinary of the place …] Before granting that permission, the Ordinary of the place …] will submit the documentation to the approval of the Archbishop of Toledo. Outside the Spanish state, the permission has to be requested to the Congregation for Divine Worship”.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top