Ebenezer "Her Church" Lutheran (ELCA) in San Francisco, California

  • Thread starter Thread starter xixxvmcm85
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You are correct. The difference, of course, is that in the ELCA, it is no longer against their moral teaching for that pastor/priest to be in a “committed relationship” (unless it is heterosexual - then they have to be married :hypno:).

Jon
Yes, the ELCA recognizes that spiritual revelations and human understanding, compassion enter into the faith. LCMS parents, for example, of gay children feel very uncomfortable with the teachings of the Missouri Synod.
 
Yes, the ELCA recognizes that spiritual revelations and human understanding, compassion enter into the faith.
Spiritual revelations and human understandings about what? There are no latter day revelations on the issue of God’s word and sexual behavior, regardless of the type of behavior it is. It is not compassionate to tell people that certain behaviors are ok when God’s word says they are not, heterosexual or otherwise.
LCMS parents, for example, of gay children feel very uncomfortable with the teachings of the Missouri Synod.
Feel uncomfortable about what, specifically?

Jon
 
Spiritual revelations and human understandings about what? There are no latter day revelations on the issue of God’s word and sexual behavior, regardless of the type of behavior it is. It is not compassionate to tell people that certain behaviors are ok when God’s word says they are not, heterosexual or otherwise.

Feel uncomfortable about what, specifically?

Jon
We disagree. So be it.

Jon, take a look at all the women in this Lutheran Mass in Sweden. How can you object?

youtube.com/watch?v=styhk1N8AmM
 
We disagree. So be it.

Jon, take a look at all the women in this Lutheran Mass in Sweden. How can you object?

youtube.com/watch?v=styhk1N8AmM
If the women were not vested and were out and about in their daily lives carrying out their roles as members of God’s priestly people praying for and proclaiming to the people about them the truths of the Gospel, I am sure Jon would not object. But when such women don vestments and stand up and pray for God’s gathered people and proclaim the truths of the Gospel to them thereby acting as re-presenters of Christ in the latter context as they had in the former context, then it is altogether inappropriate. Isn’t that clear to you? Well, it’s not clear to me. But apparently it is to Jon et al.

But what is not clear to me is the assertion that Jesus Christ can be adequately represented in the Mass by non-Judean men :o
 
Yes, the ELCA recognizes that spiritual revelations and human understanding, compassion enter into the faith. LCMS parents, for example, of gay children feel very uncomfortable with the teachings of the Missouri Synod.
They have to be told that practicing homosexuality is a sin according to the Bible. But keeping homosexual feeling under control is not a sin. Everyone who thinks that being a practicing homosexuality is no big deal wants the Church to conform to the world.
 
They have to be told that practicing homosexuality is a sin according to the Bible. But keeping homosexual feeling under control is not a sin. Everyone who thinks that being a practicing homosexuality is no big deal wants the Church to conform to the world.
Hn,
It isn’t just homosexual feelings, but all sexual urges outside of marriage .
I, frankly, resist the Ttempt by some to make this a gay/straight issue.
Jon
 
“Defrocking” occurs only in those situations where a male priest does not keep his promise made before his ordination not to refuse to participate in a liturgy in which an ordained woman presbyter is functioning. There have been a number of “High Church” priests who, not believing in the validity of female presbyters have out of conscience refused to participate in such Masses. And consequently, after being warned, their faculties have been taken from them. Some of these priests have subsequently become Roman Catholics.
 
Weird. That Lutheran church has icons - the one icon even appears to be Coptic.

I didn’t think Lutherans venerated icons and the saints, or is this church aberrant? I admit I know little about Lutherans.
Lutherans, per se, do not venerate icons or statues. They are holy images of our Lord and his saints, the company of heaven. In general, the Western Church doesn’t use icons like the Eastern Church which is a shame. But they are showing up more often in Lutheran churches and I suspect, the same is true of Anglican and Roman Catholic churches.

Here’s a few photos of Lutheran churches in the U.S. with icons:
 
Weird. That Lutheran church has icons - the one icon even appears to be Coptic.

I didn’t think Lutherans venerated icons and the saints, or is this church aberrant? I admit I know little about Lutherans.
Icons are increasingly common in Lutheran churches even more so in Swedish Lutheran churches. My bishop in Sweden had an icon that covered one whole wall of the chapel in his residence. In the cathedral of my diocese there was an icon of the Theotokos before which fresh flowers were set every week. In Lutheran homes both in this country and in Scandinavia icons are often to be found. And now one can even find newly written Marian hymns in the Swedish Psalm Book.
 
Very interesting. So are there any other common Lutheran practices like what Jotto said about placing fresh flowers before an icon of the Theotokos? Incensing, candles, etc. I only ask since this would, IMO, definitely be a form of veneration. Although now that I look at the pictures again, I can see a couple candles in the second picture near a statue and near what seems to be an icon in back corner.

Some of the Oriental Orthodox churches, for example, don’t tend to kiss and prostrate before icons much if at all, but they do usually venerate icons in different ways that aren’t as overt as the Eastern Orthodox ways. AFAIK, the EO practice is at least partly a post-iconoclast affirmation of our icon veneration, whereas other traditions didn’t have the iconoclast so at least some of them have more moderate forms of veneration.
 
Very interesting. So are there any other common Lutheran practices like what Jotto said about placing fresh flowers before an icon of the Theotokos? Incensing, candles, etc. I only ask since this would, IMO, definitely be a form of veneration. Although now that I look at the pictures again, I can see a couple candles in the second picture near a statue and near what seems to be an icon in back corner.

Some of the Oriental Orthodox churches, for example, don’t tend to kiss and prostrate before icons much if at all, but they do usually venerate icons in different ways that aren’t as overt as the Eastern Orthodox ways. AFAIK, the EO practice is at least partly a post-iconoclast affirmation of our icon veneration, whereas other traditions didn’t have the iconoclast so at least some of them have more moderate forms of veneration.
Obviously, Orthodox have a very precise belief in the meaning of icons. I think icons are actually more appealing to me than statues and I have several around my home. My parish has an icon of Christ ascending into heaven on the aumbry to the side of the altar. Jotto points out that icons and statues, especially of Christ, are often accompanied by flowers and votive lights.

Lutherans don’t use incense as much as Orthodox, Catholics and probably Anglicans. When a thurible is used, mostly it is at the altar or Gospel procession; also the crucifix.

This might be a good separate discussion.
 
Obviously, Orthodox have a very precise belief in the meaning of icons. I think icons are actually more appealing to me than statues and I have several around my home. My parish has an icon of Christ ascending into heaven on the aumbry to the side of the altar. Jotto points out that icons and statues, especially of Christ, are often accompanied by flowers and votive lights.

Lutherans don’t use incense as much as Orthodox, Catholics and probably Anglicans. When a thurible is used, mostly it is at the altar or Gospel procession; also the crucifix.

This might be a good separate discussion.
Very interesting, and this would make a good separate discussion.
 
I have a Christus Rex crucifix very similar to the one on the right in Evagelcatholic’s photos, but it is much much smaller.

I keep seeing the word “priest”. I thought Lutherans called their clergy pastors they did when I was in the American Lutheran Church. Has that changed now?
 
I have a Christus Rex crucifix very similar to the one on the right in Evagelcatholic’s photos, but it is much much smaller.

I keep seeing the word “priest”. I thought Lutherans called their clergy pastors they did when I was in the American Lutheran Church. Has that changed now?
No, the majority of American Lutherans use the words pastor, deacon and bishop for the clergy. European call them priests and “Father”.
 
I have a Christus Rex crucifix very similar to the one on the right in Evagelcatholic’s photos, but it is much much smaller.

I keep seeing the word “priest”. I thought Lutherans called their clergy pastors they did when I was in the American Lutheran Church. Has that changed now?
My parish uses a Christus Rex processional crucifix, and the large crucifix over the altar is iconic.

GKC
 
I have a Christus Rex crucifix very similar to the one on the right in Evagelcatholic’s photos, but it is much much smaller.

I keep seeing the word “priest”. I thought Lutherans called their clergy pastors they did when I was in the American Lutheran Church. Has that changed now?
In Sweden and in Finland, clergy have since the time of the Reformation, continued to be titled “priest.” Though sometimes referring to the head priest of parish or just in general as is the case of Free Church clergy, they are referred to as “pastor.”
 
And priest is used in the confessions.
Jon
Me thinks that is only very seldom that Lutheran clergy in Europe are addressed as “Father.” And when they are it is for the most part as honorific title not unlike “monsignor” in Roman Catholic circles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top