C
Clovis
Guest
When I look at The New Testament there are things which confuse me. One is the demon possessed; was this the ancients way of saying someone was aggressive and mentally ill? (Edited)
No - there are demons and there is metal illness.When I look at The New Testament there are things which confuse me. One is the demon possessed; was this the ancients way of saying someone was aggressive and mentally ill? (Edited)
In his work, “The Spirit of Catholicism,” Karl Adam states: An estimate of the nature of the Church in the light of our Lord’s eschatological teaching yields two points: In the first place we see that the foundation of the Church is in the direct line of His thought. For the very reason that the Kingdom of Heaven is established in the immediate present and must by the Father’s will wait a long time yet for the Coming of the Bridegroom, it is necessary that the pearl of great price should be provided a protective shell, that the new spirit of God’s governance should have a body, in order to pass unscathed through history. But since this present Kingdom is completed only in the future, therefore the life of the Church also is ordinated to that future. The Church, founded on the one Peter, is a society awaiting the parousia, and her nature is fundamentally eschatological. And so her dogma is in its purpose a preparation for the future vision. “Now we see in only in a mirror . . . but then face to face.”When I look at The New Testament there are things which confuse me. One is the demon possessed; was this the ancients way of saying someone was aggressive and mentally ill? Also, the whole concept of redemption. I, unlike many, believe Christ was very pessimistic of life on earth and excruciatingly ominous, yet I here so many Christians overjoyed with hope and the certainty of Christ’s love; since Christ mentions only the Gospels as having importance in the end times, where in the Gospels can it be found, this hope and Christ’s love?
This is a good question because I wanted to ask it ask well. About a year ago I listening to a homily who said that these possessions are actually simple illnesses but the ancient people associated such things with demons. I personally do not to believe this because many passages refer to the demons speaking etc. I don’t see how one can make such an argument.One is the demon possessed; was this the ancients way of saying someone was aggressive and mentally ill?
From what I read excorcists can tell by looking in the eyes. Something about the way they roll up.This is a good question because I wanted to ask it ask well. About a year ago I listening to a homily who said that these possessions are actually simple illnesses but the ancient people associated such things with demons. I personally do not to believe this because many passages refer to the demons speaking etc. I don’t see how one can make such an argument.
In the time of the New Testament, there was not a general consensus about the existence of angels and demons. Actually, it was controversial as the Acts of the Apostles tells us in chapter 23.When I look at The New Testament there are things which confuse me. One is the demon possessed; was this the ancients way of saying someone was aggressive and mentally ill?
The Gospels also make a clear distinction between illness and possession, e.g., in Mark 6:13 it says that the apostles, “cast out many demons and anointed with oil many who were sick and healed them.”And when he had said this, a dissension arose between the Pharisees and the Sadducees, and the assembly was divided. For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, nor angel, nor spirit, but the Pharisees acknowledge them all. Then a great clamor arose, and some of the scribes of the Pharisees’ party stood up and contended sharply,“We find nothing wrong in this man. What if a spirit or an angel spoke to him?”
Christ wasn’t optimistic or pessimistic about anything: he knows the truth, the real objective truth about each one of us and about life on earth.I, unlike many, believe Christ was very pessimistic of life on earth and excruciatingly ominous, yet I here so many Christians overjoyed with hope and the certainty of Christ’s love;
Not to mention John 3:16-17:“I have said these things to you, that in me you may have peace. In the world you will have tribulation. But take heart; I have overcome the world.”
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him.
Does Christ mention that only the four books of the Gospel will have importance in the end times?since Christ mentions only the Gospels as having importance in the end times, where in the Gospels can it be found, this hope and Christ’s love?
Peace and all-good!When I look at The New Testament there are things which confuse me. One is the demon possessed; was this the ancients way of saying someone was aggressive and mentally ill? Also, the whole concept of redemption. I, unlike many, believe Christ was very pessimistic of life on earth and excruciatingly ominous, yet I here so many Christians overjoyed with hope and the certainty of Christ’s love; since Christ mentions only the Gospels as having importance in the end times, where in the Gospels can it be found, this hope and Christ’s love?