EDITED: Would the faithful who don't receive the Eucharist obtain the same graces?

[MyNameIsDan]

I’ll put it into context. Pope Francis went to Tacloban in the Philippines and those who attended did not receive communion. Would they have received the same graces as if they did receive the Eucharist given the situation? I’m guessing the situation is that there were a lot of people and so it probably would have been difficult to bring the Eucharist to everyone.

I think John 6:53 on wards will answer my question, but I wanted to ask.

Thanks.

 

[Jimdandy]

www.ndbcnews.com.ph/news/mass-at-luneta-ends-pope-francis-go-around-to-reach-more-people

“Over 5,000 lay people help distribute communion to the huge crowd.”

 

[MyNameIsDan]

www.ndbcnews.com.ph/news/mass-at-luneta-ends-pope-francis-go-around-to-reach-more-people

“Over 5,000 lay people help distribute communion to the huge crowd.”

I’m speaking of the one in Tacloban. They did not distribute communion there.

 

[ProVobis]

Here’s what the Catechism of Trent says:

Threefold Manner Of Communicating

That the faithful may learn to be zealous for the better gifts, they must be shown who can obtain these abundant fruits from the Holy Eucharist, must be reminded that there is not only one way of communicating. Wisely and rightly, then, did our predecessors in the faith, as we read in the Council of Trent, distinguish three ways of receiving this Sacrament.

Some receive it sacramentally only. Such are those sinners who do not fear to approach the holy mysteries with polluted lips and heart, who, as the Apostle says, eat and drink the Lord’s body unworthily. Of this class of communicants St. Augustine says: He who dwells not in Christ, and in whom Christ dwells not, most certainly does not eat spiritually His flesh, although carnally and visibly he press with his teeth the Sacrament of His flesh and blood. Those, therefore, who receive the sacred mysteries with such a disposition, not only obtain no fruit therefrom, but, as the Apostle himself testifies, eat and drink judgment to themselves.

Others are said to receive the Eucharist in spirit only. They are those who, inflamed with a lively faith which worketh by charity,’ partake in wish and desire of that celestial bread offered to them, from which they receive, if not the entire, at least very great fruits.

Lastly, there are some who receive the Holy Eucharist both sacramentally and spiritually, those who, according to the teaching of the Apostle, having first proved themselves and having approached this divine banquet adorned with the nuptial garment, derive from the Eucharist those most abundant fruits which we have already described. Hence it is clear that those who, having it in their power to receive with fitting preparation the Sacrament of the body of the Lord, are yet satisfied with a spiritual Communion only, deprive themselves of the greatest and most heavenly advantages.