L
leonie
Guest
wondering if anyone has any info on this based perhaps on the reign of Herod the Great?
Maybe He died earlier than we thought too?I’ve never heard anyone posit a birth year for Jesus as early as 12 BC.
He would have been middle aged on the Cross–perhaps we should add a pot belly?![]()
we have no idea.wondering if anyone has any info on this based perhaps on the reign of Herod the Great?
I would say the answer is zero. This story is easily interpreted as typical Jewish midrash genre in which Matthew is presenting Jesus to his largely Jewish audience as the new Moses.wondering if anyone has any info on this based perhaps on the reign of Herod the Great?
Herod is traditionally assumed to have died somewhere in 4 BC, though there was a recent writer who put forward the case that his death actually occured in 1 BC.aw, you guys are no help at all!!
I’m rejecting any idea that gives Mary other children. According to my Catholic faith, that’s heresy!! Though, Steve, thanks for taking time to give me such a lengthy response. I appreciate your thoughts.
Could anyone give me the date of Herod’s death?
Admittedly, this is where I don’t side with Hagan.One of my favorite subjects.
It all depends on when Jesus was born, a subject of no small contention.
I will give you a theory from Hagan’s “Passover”.
To make a long story short, Jesus was born in 12 B.C., close to the time of the passage of Halley’s Comet, and born somewhere close to Bethlehem. The comet was a tremendously spectacular celestial event. This prompted the “wise men” to come to Herod looking for a new-born King, and so the infanticide began.
Josephs and his family had to flee to Egypt in either 12, 11, or 10 B.C.
Correct.When Herod the Great died in 4 B.C., Joseph ventured to return back to Judea. There, he found Herod’s son Archelaus ruling, and was just as cruel and on the lookout for the Messiah as Herod had been. Joseph and his family moved north to Nazareth, in the territory of Herod Antipas. Antipas had a much milder disposition, and, besides, he was building a capital city at nearby Sepphoris, so there was work to be had.
The enrollment period of A.D. 6 occurred when Archelaus was removed by Augustus, and his kingdom was transformed into a Roman province. A census had to be taken so Augustus knew what he had. So Joseph and Mary had to return to be counted, and in Bethlehem Mary had a later child, possibly the future James the Just. The author of Luke mixed up the two stories, or was told them incorrectly by his sources.
So Jesus lived in Egypt for probably six or seven years before going to Nazareth.
As a Catholic, I don’t believe in the idea that Mary the Aeiparthenos (ever-Virgin) had other biological children besides Jesus.But many don’t agree with this, and we should hear from them shortly!
The statement “You do not yet have fifty years” was actually made in the context of Jesus talking about Abraham “seeing [His] day” (John 8:31-59). Some commentators explain this by saying that fifty is just a round number, or that Jesus looked older than He really was (not really strange in that day and age). But in any case, if we read this passage in its context, I think the point of the statement is not so much Jesus’ specific age but is rather that this man wasn’t around yet during Abraham’s time, nor He could have been - I mean, Abraham lived centuries - millenia ago! To which Jesus answers: “before Abraham was, I am.” Biblical passages should not be cherry-picked and divorced from their original context.Patrick! Vince! Old friends all.
We gave been down this road before…
In response to Jesus’ age, in the book of John, six months before his crucifixion, Jesus was rebuked by the Jews in the Temple for preaching with authority though he was “not yet fifty.”
Could that possibly mean that Jesus (gasp!) was actually close to being fifty years of age, but not quite? If so, that would support a 12 B.C. birth date. BTW, in those lean times, pot bellies were a rarity.
It could well be.The statement “You do not yet have fifty years” was actually made in the context of Jesus talking about Abraham “seeing [His] day” (John 8:31-59). Some commentators explain this by saying that fifty is just a round number, or that Jesus looked older than He really was (not really strange in that day and age). But in any case, if we read this passage in its context, I think the point of the statement is not so much Jesus’ specific age but is rather that this man wasn’t around yet during Abraham’s time, nor He could have been - I mean, Abraham lived centuries - millenia ago! To which Jesus answers: “before Abraham was, I am.” Biblical passages should not be cherry-picked and divorced from their original context.
Some take a passage in St. Irenaeus’ Adversus Haereses to mean that Irenaeus believed Christ was fifty, but this was something that a few folks in the net have answered adequately.
Mary having other children has no bearing on the question of how long the Holy Family was in Egypt.aw, you guys are no help at all!!
I’m rejecting any idea that gives Mary other children.
Please, chapter and verse? Thanks.Patrick! Vince! Old friends all.
We gave been down this road before…
In response to Jesus’ age, in the book of John, six months before his crucifixion, Jesus was rebuked by the Jews in the Temple for preaching with authority though he was “not yet fifty.”
I’ll answer for Steve here.Please, chapter and verse? Thanks.
Thanks! Appreciate the reference.I’ll answer for Steve here.
The Judaeans said to Him, “Now we have known that you have a demon! Abraham died, and the prophets; and you are saying, ‘If any one may keep my word, he shall never taste of death to the age’. You are not greater than our father Abraham who died, are you? And the prophets died. Whom do you make yourself?” Jesus answered, “If I glorify myself, my glory is nothing. It is my Father who is glorifying me, of whom you say that He is your God; and you have not known Him, and I have known Him. And if I say that I have not known Him, I shall be like you - a liar; but I have known Him, and His word I keep. Abraham your father was glad that he might see my day; and he saw, and rejoiced.”
The Judaeans, therefore, said to Him, “You do not yet have fifty years, and have you seen Abraham?” Jesus said to them, “Amen, amen, I say to you, before Abraham was - I am.” They took up, therefore, stones that they may throw at Him, but Jesus hid Himself and went out from the temple.
- John 8:52-59
Thank you, Patrick.Thanks! Appreciate the reference.
Still, so what? What does this have to do with the topic of this thread? The Gospel of John (and not other Gospel or New Testament passage) indicating Jesus was “not yet 50” means what?
Jesus was “not yet 50” at his birth. And his crucifixion. And at everything recorded about him in all four Gospels.
So, what’s the point? This thread is about how long the Holy Family was in Egypt. What does John 8:52-59 have to do with that? Thanks!
Of course I meant 2-3 B.C.Thank you, Patrick.
Obviously, if you want to know how long Jesus spent in Egypt, you have to know when he was born, when he died, and even then make some assumptions on Jesus’ life and the history of those times. Hagan does OK with this relying on Josephus.
About the quote in John, if taken literally, and we assume that Jesus was 48 or thereabouts just before his crucifixion, that blows a huge hole in the theory that Jesus was crucified in A.D. 33, and was born in either A.D. 2 or 3.
So a complicated answer is needed for this outwardly simple question.