J
jp54321
Guest
What are the differences between the OF and the EF Easter Vigil Liturgy?
No vestments changes in the OF?Start time?
If this were the case, it would mean that the EF Easter Vigil would not satisfy the requirements for an Easter Mass, while an OF Vigil definitely does satisfy such requirements.Start time?
In the EF the Vigil is technically not a Mass is my understanding.
I know we’ve debated this before and I’ll try to find the specifics unless someone else beats me to it.![]()
Right.If this were the case, it would mean that the EF Easter Vigil would not satisfy the requirements for an Easter Mass
How does any of this prove your earlier point that the (edit: EF) Easter Vigil is not a proper “Mass”?Right.
In the 1962 handmissal I have it says “The hour for beginning this [Holy Saturday] solemn service should be selected so that the Mass of Resurrection may begin about midnight; but the Bishop of the Diocese may judge it better for special reasons to begin earlier; nevertheless this earlier start should preferably be later than twilight, and on no account before sunset.”
Then it has the Blessing the New Fire, Blessing of the Paschal Candle, Procession and Exultet, Lessons from the Prophecies, First Part of the Litanies, Blessing of Baptismal Water, Renewal of Baptismal Promises, Second Part of the Litanies, then the Mass.
Because as I remember back in 1962, the Vigil, designed to be said on Holy Saturday, did not fulfill the Sunday obligation per se? I’m not sure there was always a Mass afterwards but I could be wrong. Of course now the same Mass could be said after vespere and it counts for Sunday. I have yet to find one though.How does any of this prove your earlier point that the (edit: EF) Easter Vigil is not a proper “Mass”?
Nomenclature basically. GoGoSanDiego shows where the EF Mass starts and where the OF starts. And if I remember right, in 1962 the Mass didn’t always start right after the VIgil but I could be wrong. We had no vespere Masses which fulfilled the Sunday obligation then.How does any of this prove your earlier point that the (edit: EF) Easter Vigil is not a proper “Mass”?
Right.
In the 1962 handmissal I have it says “The hour for beginning this [Holy Saturday] solemn service should be selected so that the Mass of Resurrection may begin about midnight; but the Bishop of the Diocese may judge it better for special reasons to begin earlier; nevertheless this earlier start should preferably be later than twilight, and on no account before sunset.”
Then it has the Blessing the New Fire, Blessing of the Paschal Candle, Procession and Exultet, Lessons from the Prophecies, First Part of the Litanies, Blessing of Baptismal Water, Renewal of Baptismal Promises, Second Part of the Litanies, then the Mass.
Yet today, in the 21st century, when the EF is celebrated on the Easter Vigil, Mass immediately follows the lighting of the fire, the greater (and lesser) litanies, etc. Anyone who attends “Easter Vigil” in the EF will necessarily experience all of that plus Mass.Nomenclature basically. GoGoSanDiego shows where the EF Mass starts and where the OF starts. And if I remember right, in 1962 the Mass didn’t always start right after the VIgil but I could be wrong. We had no vespere Masses which fulfilled the Sunday obligation then.
I’ve never been to either so I’ll take your word for it.Yet today, in the 21st century, when the EF is celebrated on the Easter Vigil, Mass immediately follows the lighting of the fire, the greater (and lesser) litanies, etc. Anyone who attends “Easter Vigil” in the EF will necessarily experience all of that plus Mass.