EF Wedding

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikelionheart
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

mikelionheart

Guest
A wedding was celebrated in my church last week by a visiting priest from the ICKSP.

In what way would this be different from a wedding in the OF?
 
The rite of marriage is before the Mass. Other than that, for the most part, I believe it is a normal EF Mass.
 
A wedding was celebrated in my church last week by a visiting priest from the ICKSP.

In what way would this be different from a wedding in the OF?
I’ll be wed in a traditional Latin nuptial Mass this August (prayers, pls?) and father was explaining the difference. Usually it’s a Low Mass but with a little more pomp; bigshots have Solemn nuptial Masses. The rite of marriage happens before Mass begins, and after the Pater Noster there is a special blessing for the bride. Also, I think normally the Gloria and Credo are omitted, unless it’s also a special feast. The readings are always the same (not chosen by the couple) and read by the priest (not by the couple’s friends) and the music is mostly just the propers being sung, so we had very little work to do planning the Mass.
 
I’ll be wed in a traditional Latin nuptial Mass this August (prayers, pls?) and father was explaining the difference. Usually it’s a Low Mass but with a little more pomp; bigshots have Solemn nuptial Masses.
Wait a minute. This isn’t really right.
Anyone can have a solemn nuptial mass as long as everything necessary can be arranged.

These days the hardest part of “everything necessary” is likely to be deacons and choir, but if you’ve got them, you’re good to go.
 
Wait a minute. This isn’t really right.
Anyone can have a solemn nuptial mass as long as everything necessary can be arranged.

These days the hardest part of “everything necessary” is likely to be deacons and choir, but if you’ve got them, you’re good to go.
Of course, you’re right wasserfall. I didn’t mean to state it was some kind of rule. The Church doesn’t have a criteria for establishing “bigshots,” but we were happy when father suggested that a Low Mass is the usual kind.
 
Of course, you’re right wasserfall. I didn’t mean to state it was some kind of rule. The Church doesn’t have a criteria for establishing “bigshots,” but we were happy when father suggested that a Low Mass is the usual kind.
I have been to many nuptial Masses in the EF and all but one were High Masses. Speaking as one who has been in the latin liturgy movement for many years, I think I can say that you will see that is the norm these days.
 
I have been to many nuptial Masses in the EF and all but one were High Masses. Speaking as one who has been in the latin liturgy movement for many years, I think I can say that you will see that is the norm these days.
Well, we will have a schola singing the propers, but otherwise I think the rubrics are for Low Mass. Frankly, I don’t totally understand how to classify the kind of nuptial Mass it will be, but as long as we get married that’s okay with me. 🙂
 
My daughter was married two weeks ago. The Mass was a Solemn High Mass (Byrd). It was a First Friday and an Ember Day.

To answer the OP question, some of the differences are that in the OF, the couple usually has quite a bit of latitude in selecting the readings and the music. There is no reading selection choice in the EF. There is also typically a candle ceremony in the OF that the parents of the couple are involved in although I am not sure if this is rubrical or just sentimental.

In the EF, the priest will not say “you may now kiss the bride” and the congregation will not applaud.
 
EF nuptial wedding mass sounds pretty good.

I get married 6 weeks today.

I wouldn’t mind requesting the EF one.

Doubt I will though, don’t think the lady would go for it.
 
giuseppeTO;9412086:
My daughter was married two weeks ago. The Mass was a Solemn High Mass (Byrd). It was a First Friday and an Ember Day.[/quotes]
Congrats to you, your daughter!

What do they say when you cross the threshold from single to married?
They often don’t say this in the OF. They didn’t in mine. We just had the Sign of Peace and did it then.
 
I have been to many nuptial Masses in the EF and all but one were High Masses. Speaking as one who has been in the latin liturgy movement for many years, I think I can say that you will see that is the norm these days.
I think you’re both talking about a missa cantata, but you’re calling it a high mass, and Rich is calling it a low mass.

Many parishes/chapels/lmcs don’t have the resources for a solemn high mass, most notably two extra priests or deacons to assist.
 
In the EF, the priest will not say “you may now kiss the bride” and the congregation will not applaud.
That applies to actual traditional parishes/chapels, but these days some “novus ordo” couples are having traditional nuptial masses because they are solemn and grand. In such cases, the priest might well be diocesan, none of the participants or attendees traditional, and so who knows what might happen.
 
I think you’re both talking about a missa cantata, but you’re calling it a high mass, and Rich is calling it a low mass.

Many parishes/chapels/lmcs don’t have the resources for a solemn high mass, most notably two extra priests or deacons to assist.
As an MC of many years’ experience, I am aware of the distinctions. However, in the 1962 missal (there were slight revisions in 1960 rubrics and terminology), there are two kinds of High Mass: Solemn (with deacon and subdeacon) and Sung (priest only). Thus, when one uses the term High Mass, it may be either a Solemn Mass or a Missa Cantata. In fact, in the 1962 missal, the correct term for the former is Solemn Mass, rather than Solemn High Mass, as previously.
 
As an MC of many years’ experience, I am aware of the distinctions. However, in the 1962 missal (there were slight revisions in 1960 rubrics and terminology), there are two kinds of High Mass: Solemn (with deacon and subdeacon) and Sung (priest only). Thus, when one uses the term High Mass, it may be either a Solemn Mass or a Missa Cantata. In fact, in the 1962 missal, the correct term for the former is Solemn Mass, rather than Solemn High Mass, as previously.
I didn’t mean to imply that you were missing a distinction, Mr Chatter.

It just seemed to me that you were both talking about the same thing, but using different words. Rich said “a low mass with sung propers”, which is pretty close to the definition of a missa cantata. And as you didn’t use the word “solemn”, I figured you also were speaking of a missa cantata.
 
I think you’re both talking about a missa cantata, but you’re calling it a high mass, and Rich is calling it a low mass.

Many parishes/chapels/lmcs don’t have the resources for a solemn high mass, most notably two extra priests or deacons to assist.
I guess we’ll see if it’s two or six when we get there. I’m just really thankful for a girl that loves the traditional Mass as much as I do.
 
I guess we’ll see if it’s two or six when we get there. I’m just really thankful for a girl that loves the traditional Mass as much as I do.
You think that’s more important than how many candles are lit at mass?
Talk about misplaced priorities! :D:D
 
Just attended my girlfriend’s sister’s wedding. It was an EF Nuptial Mass. I can tell you the biggest difference was there were four kneelers on the altar as opposed to the usual two for the bride and groom. The extra two are for the maid and man of honor. Aside from the usual Latin Mass not much else in differences. Father didn’t say to kiss the bride but implied they could and everyone clapped…no complete silence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top