R
RKS89
Guest
A lot of non-Catholics I come in contact with have issues with how the Church deals with her leadership. Their complaints often lead to similar questions, the main point being, “How do these men get so high up in the Church?”
This question has nothing to do with abuses of any kind, I’m just wondering how to answer this. For example I watched the JPII film with John Voight and it gives you the impression his election was partly due to a desire to have a younger pope who could reach the youth, as well as a political motivation to deal with Communism.
How much does personal/professional experience play into a bishops or Pope’s election? How much is due to personal holiness? Is there a criteria that must be followed, or are these appointments the result of prayer and consideration on the part of superiors or cardinals? Are the social, political and spiritual demands and issues of the times these men are appointed considered?
It’s just not an area of the Church I’m familiar with.
This question has nothing to do with abuses of any kind, I’m just wondering how to answer this. For example I watched the JPII film with John Voight and it gives you the impression his election was partly due to a desire to have a younger pope who could reach the youth, as well as a political motivation to deal with Communism.
How much does personal/professional experience play into a bishops or Pope’s election? How much is due to personal holiness? Is there a criteria that must be followed, or are these appointments the result of prayer and consideration on the part of superiors or cardinals? Are the social, political and spiritual demands and issues of the times these men are appointed considered?
It’s just not an area of the Church I’m familiar with.
Last edited: