M
masha
Guest
Chosen,
I think I understand what you mean when you say we tend to throw around the term “emotional abuse”. I think it’s a tendency everywhere, because we like to diagnose ourselves in every aspect of life. I playfully call myself mildly OCD to excuse myself for keeping very clean house, so that my friends have a way to understand why my house is very clean - instead of explaining that I just put a high value on beauty and order, which might sound as though they don’t. Diagnosis is all over now: ADD, OCD, chronic fatique, social anxiety…some people really do suffer, and some assume they do because of some similarity. I have a friend who suffers from “chronic fatique syndrome” but only when she’s overworked herself, or travelled a lot, or gone a couple nights with no sleep.
Emotional abuse is difficult to say, though, because often we want to say “if he feels abused, who’s to say his feelings are wrong?” But sometimes his feelings are wrong: sometimes he’s recreating his parent’s marriage, playing the victim, or so overly sensitive that every comment could be “emotional abuse”. Sometimes its a combination of a tendency towards manipulation in one spouse and a tendency towards a sort of passive-aggressive victimhood in the other. My husband and I visited one of my sister’s recently and that combination could been seen clearly in her marriage. Her husband is immature, selfish, moody, and needy; he can be a ‘nice’ guy, and generally he is, but he’s impatient and unwilling to sacrifice in the little things. I think with a different type of woman he’d be better able to grow toward the good, but my sister is extremely sensitive, extremely passive-aggressive, and as soon as she married fell into the nagging, disappointed wife role, which makes it difficult for her impatient husband to act lovingly towards her. Now when we see them I think “emotional abuse!” about his behaviour towards her, but honestly looking at it I think it’s not really emotional abuse, because neither is really the abuser, and neither is really the victim. They’re just two immature people making each other miserable.
When people use the term “emotional abuse” it generally implies a certain amount of innocence on the part of the abused party, which is true in the case of true emotional abuse, but not necessarily true in many situations labeled “emotional abuse” (I hope that doesn’t sound like I’m blaming the victim, I’m not - read the bold section again). We have a tendency to side with the people we know (or the poster, on the forum) and against the other party, but relationships are complex, people are complex, and we shouldn’t be too quick to say “it is emotional abuse”, encourage seperation, or define the situation.
Masha
I think I understand what you mean when you say we tend to throw around the term “emotional abuse”. I think it’s a tendency everywhere, because we like to diagnose ourselves in every aspect of life. I playfully call myself mildly OCD to excuse myself for keeping very clean house, so that my friends have a way to understand why my house is very clean - instead of explaining that I just put a high value on beauty and order, which might sound as though they don’t. Diagnosis is all over now: ADD, OCD, chronic fatique, social anxiety…some people really do suffer, and some assume they do because of some similarity. I have a friend who suffers from “chronic fatique syndrome” but only when she’s overworked herself, or travelled a lot, or gone a couple nights with no sleep.
Emotional abuse is difficult to say, though, because often we want to say “if he feels abused, who’s to say his feelings are wrong?” But sometimes his feelings are wrong: sometimes he’s recreating his parent’s marriage, playing the victim, or so overly sensitive that every comment could be “emotional abuse”. Sometimes its a combination of a tendency towards manipulation in one spouse and a tendency towards a sort of passive-aggressive victimhood in the other. My husband and I visited one of my sister’s recently and that combination could been seen clearly in her marriage. Her husband is immature, selfish, moody, and needy; he can be a ‘nice’ guy, and generally he is, but he’s impatient and unwilling to sacrifice in the little things. I think with a different type of woman he’d be better able to grow toward the good, but my sister is extremely sensitive, extremely passive-aggressive, and as soon as she married fell into the nagging, disappointed wife role, which makes it difficult for her impatient husband to act lovingly towards her. Now when we see them I think “emotional abuse!” about his behaviour towards her, but honestly looking at it I think it’s not really emotional abuse, because neither is really the abuser, and neither is really the victim. They’re just two immature people making each other miserable.
When people use the term “emotional abuse” it generally implies a certain amount of innocence on the part of the abused party, which is true in the case of true emotional abuse, but not necessarily true in many situations labeled “emotional abuse” (I hope that doesn’t sound like I’m blaming the victim, I’m not - read the bold section again). We have a tendency to side with the people we know (or the poster, on the forum) and against the other party, but relationships are complex, people are complex, and we shouldn’t be too quick to say “it is emotional abuse”, encourage seperation, or define the situation.
Masha