L
lily22
Guest
get the heck away from this wicked witch.
I wonder, if your husband’s mom had promised him a ride and your husband cursed and hung up the phone on his mom in the subsequent conversation, would he expect that she would still “keep her promise” and “give him a ride”?I am trying to persuade my husband not to drive them, but he feels that he can’t go back on his word to drive his mom. His mom did text after a while apologizing for her behavior, and just now offered via text to pay for our cat’s medical treatments. So I guess now she’s trying to bribe us.![]()
This is not a matter for text messaging or email. She needs to swallow her pride, get on the phone with her son with her husband on hand, and promise that she will be the last one to hang up, no matter what happens.
I’ve honestly never heard of a mother who would speak that way to her son and daughter-in-law. I’m envisioning the worst sort of trailer park trash…He tried to bring up his sister’s actions, and his mom told him that we can both go f*** ourselves and hung up on us.
that kind of peace, is not the peace of God.I agree with the other posters, that you do not have to go. This is how we handle things like this.
We usually have an excuse ready. For drive like this-i would have piled a lot of stuff in the car, and said there is no room for everyone. Not completely honest, not a lie as there would be stuff there on that day.
I have learned over the years to come up with benign reasons when dealing with manipulative people to avoid arguing and keep peace.
I think you will be avoiding a whole lot of trouble by just letting your husband take them. If he can’t take them, then they can find their own transportation. You don’t need to be subjected to your MIL and SIL’s abuse. Just stay out of it. Seriously, would they tolerate YOU treating them the way they are treating you? I bet not.Thank you all so much for your supportive replies and advice. I am trying to persuade my husband not to drive them, but he feels that he can’t go back on his word to drive his mom. His mom did text after a while apologizing for her behavior, and just now offered via text to pay for our cat’s medical treatments. So I guess now she’s trying to bribe us.
Graduation is kind of out of the realm of possibility now, since the plane tickets would cost $600+ and that doesn’t include the bus to campus from the airport, food, and the difficulty of finding somewhere to stay. All the hotels get booked in March or April, so I’d have to find someone’s couch to sleep on. And both the friends who are graduating are guys, so that wouldn’t really be appropriate.
FIL did finally get in touch with us and actually took our side, though he pointed out that he did warn DH that MIL would be very emotional, etc because of her aunt’s death. We’re going to see how it goes when FIL talks to MIL about everything. Even with the apology, I still feel very upset, especially after how she acted the last time she visited (basically very entitled and acted like we were her chauffeurs) so I think I’ll try to find something else to do if DH insists on driving her.
It is not OK to lie, but when manipulative people are also spiteful, staying off their radar rather than confronting them directly is the most prudent course. Some of those with these character traits will suffer three times in order to make you suffer once. It is no cowardice to give them a wide berth as quietly as possible.that kind of peace, is not the peace of God.
Yes. The son can also tell his MIL that both he and she will have a much more pleasant ride if the SIL and wife are not forced into the car together.I think you will be avoiding a whole lot of trouble by just letting your husband take them. If he can’t take them, then they can find their own transportation. You don’t need to be subjected to your MIL and SIL’s abuse. Just stay out of it. Seriously, would they tolerate YOU treating them the way they are treating you? I bet not.
no, you dont reward them by going along with them.I think you will be avoiding a whole lot of trouble by just letting your husband take them. If he can’t take them, then they can find their own transportation. You don’t need to be subjected to your MIL and SIL’s abuse. Just stay out of it. Seriously, would they tolerate YOU treating them the way they are treating you? I bet not.
Thank you for your (name removed by moderator)ut! You’re right that the family doesn’t know we are cutting her off, so to speak, but that’s mainly because they manipulate DH into keeping in contact. He would have stopped talking to her long before she met me if they didn’t freak out every single time. We had decided privately, on our own, not to spend any holidays, family events, etc with her because of her treatment of other people (including FIL and MIL.) I don’t remember if we mentioned anything about it to FIL and MIL.I am going to take the “opposite” side here, not to defend your sister-in-law but from what little information you provided the scenario seems somewhat reasonable. With the exception that your mother-in-law didn’t call you in advance to ask. The only reason I say this is because I don’t think you have been clear to your family that you want nothing to do with your sister-in-law ever. So because your family members see you at occasional gatherings & parties they might think you are getting along sometimes. If you and your husband had officially announced that your sister-in-law was going to be cut out of your lives because of her behavior, and THEN your mother-in-law invited her, then I would say you are 100% right, however that is not what happened here so I think there is a bit of room for misunderstanding.
For the future, please decide with your husband how you want to proceed in your life. You cannot waffle on this. You will need to decide if you want this woman in you lives or not and to what degree. Are you going to see her at Christmas? Is the Christmas party more than three hours? If it is, your husband may wonder why you can see her at Christmas but not in the car? How about in the Summer? I know you are emotional about this and it is easy to say “I can’t take it” but you need to be practical in order to be fair to your husband and in-laws so they know where you stand. This family already sounds very emotional and moody, you don’t want to add to that, please be stable and steady.
**** I am not taking sides with mom’s rude or abusive behavior or sister-in-law’s rude or abusive behavior. I am just pointing out that the whole scenario of the ride to the funeral seems like a reasonable misunderstanding ****
This is probably what’s going to happen.I think you will be avoiding a whole lot of trouble by just letting your husband take them. If he can’t take them, then they can find their own transportation. You don’t need to be subjected to your MIL and SIL’s abuse. Just stay out of it. Seriously, would they tolerate YOU treating them the way they are treating you? I bet not.
He did say that he plans on having a talk with them if he ends up driving both of them. I don’t think the topic of Christianity will be brought into it, though, because he’s lapsed, MIL is Lutheran but obsessed with occult things like tarot cards, etc, and SIL is an OdinistYes. The son can also tell his MIL that both he and she will have a much more pleasant ride if the SIL and wife are not forced into the car together.
BTW, this will also give the husband six hours for a heart-to-heart talk about how he and his wife have been treated, and their determination that this needs to change. This is no way for Christians to treat each other. He will have a place to admonish them lovingly and firmly, and to listen patiently and generously to their complaints about you, OP. This is a conversation that is unlikely to happen, if you are in the car. It is unlikely that he will get another chance for this much time to talk when no one can take an exit from the unpleasant topics.
This may turn out to be a golden opportunity, then, perhaps even a gift from Providence. Have your husband consider that.
This.It is not OK to lie, but when manipulative people are also spiteful, staying off their radar rather than confronting them directly is the most prudent course. Some of those with these character traits will suffer three times in order to make you suffer once. It is no cowardice to give them a wide berth as quietly as possible.
The early Christians hid in the catacombs not because the Romans couldn’t find them, but because the Romans avoided going near the physical abode of the dead. It is OK to put yourself in a place where your would-be tormentors would rather not venture.
Yes. It is a compassion when others, recognizing our particular vulnerabilities, avoid putting us in the near occasion of sin. We need to avoid becoming patronizing or contemptuous about when and how we choose to do this, but that is not much of a danger in this case.This.
Also, there’s the fact that if you can reasonably expect someone to engage in bad or abusive behavior–i.e., because they have a consistent past history of doing so–you’re doing them no favors by giving them yet another opportunity to sin in that way. The example I usually use is that of an alcoholic sibling: let’s say it’s New Years, and you’re trying to decide whether or not to invite your brother to dinner. Your brother is a raging alcoholic who has driven while drunk times out of number, and sometimes in borrowed vehicles. If you decide to invite him, and he hasn’t gone through rehab, been in good standing in AA for some time, and demonstrated that he’d genuinely changed his outlook through concrete actions, it would not be charitable to loan him your car keys for the evening. Quite the opposite, in fact.
Likewise, when one has abusive family members who refuse to reform their actions, it’s not charity to give them yet another opportunity to use you or your family as emotional (or, heaven forbid, physical) punching bags: it’s giving them another opportunity to do something wrong.
If Christianity is irrelevant, then don’t bring it up. The conversation is even easier, because the expectation that one might endure suffering out of love for the sinner is less likely to be (inappropriately) in play.He did say that he plans on having a talk with them if he ends up driving both of them. I don’t think the topic of Christianity will be brought into it, though, because he’s lapsed, MIL is Lutheran but obsessed with occult things like tarot cards, etc, and SIL is an Odinistwho also attends a Unitarian church.