I’m just trying to say that we should be seeking God before a good spouse,
What makes you think we’re not???
but aren’t the things I mentioned (and I hope an actual priest could come up with a lot more) some consolation for lack of wife, children, grandchildren?
For some yes, for some no. That is part of the discernment process.
Most priests have extended family
What about the people who don’t??? I repeat, for some getting married and having children is the only way to have a family life (I will comment on how the Church values this as important later in this post).
I received the same quote in an email last week and actually posted it in the “St. Monica pray for us” thread here in the Family Life forum. The message sent to me was titled “St. Anthony on Love”, and the message was forwarded to me by a trusted Sister in Christ in response to some difficulties I have had in my marriage.
I tried to Google this, and the only two hits
on the entire internet were this thread and the other thread you referenced! So, until we can verify the source of this (was it really from St. Anthony??), I must treat that with suspicion.
Anyone who is discouraged by this message in the OP is likely caught up in a belief that life is fair,
Whoa, whoa, whoa, time out! As Catholic Christians, are we not supposed to make life fairer? Otherwise all this anawim/preferential option/social justice talk is just a bunch of hypocrisy.
If you rely on other people to make you happy, then you’ll never be truly happy. People are imperfect, and other people rarely behave how we’d like them to.
Finding a spouse will make our lives better and more fulfilling, but, in the end, we should be able to live a happy life regardless of what other people are doing and how they’re relating to us.
If you need to find a girlfriend and get married to be happy, then you’ll be completely dependent on your wife for happiness. When she disappoints you, you’ll find yourself unable to be happy , and we’re back at square one.
(This goes for everyone on this thread, not just you.)
I have to revisit this response because the more I think about it, it is so theologically WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG that it is frightening that Catholics on this forum would be taken in by it!
First, it was God Who said “It is not good for the man to be alone” (Gen.2:18) and that is why He created woman. And the cathechism talks about the vocation to marriage being indstilled in our very nature (CCC 1603).
Second, CCC 1603 also quotes Gaudium and Spes: “
The well-being of the individual person and of both human and Christian society is closely bound up with the healthy state of conjugal and family life”. Repeat:
conjugal and family life. So, yes, for the most part, there is a part of us that does indeed need another. Again, most of you probably do not know what it is like to lose a family early; I know of only one other poster on this thread who can relate, and she herself is married! Maybe it takes having your family ripped from you to truly appreciate the value of family.
Between the first and second points, the conclusion is CLEAR: we were not built to be alone! But the Gloria Steinem/Betty Friedan/“Feminazi Mistake” crowd have poisoned society by rejecting how we were built with their “you don’t need a man”/“you are better off alone” messages that have permeated society since the 1970s. This is messing with nature, and you know what they say about the dangers of messing with nature…and we have been seeing the disastrous results ever since.
Third, the NCCB website has a section (I posted it in another thread as well) “Making a Case for Marriage”:
usccb.org/laity/marriage/makingacase.shtml.
There are two sections entitled “Why Is Marriage Good For Both Men and Women?” and “How Does Society Benefit From Strong Marriages?” that also refute what Ack says.