Knowing a lot about the Ordinariate, I have often wondered if the Ordinariate could become its own Rite? To have a distinct Rite within the Church, not being a theologian, it seems you have to have a different liturgy. That liturgy embodies a different culture.
The Anglican Ordinariate seems to have that. They have a distinct liturgy, which reflects its distinct “Anglican patrimony”, which they often talk about. Though there’s no signs of this, let’s say significant parts of the Southern Baptists wanted to come into the Church. Is their culture different enough to warrant creating an Ordinariate for them? And, could it become a Rite? I mean, after all, the Eastern Rites were mostly Eastern Churches who had been practicing Christians for centuries. They developed on their own, separately from Rome. And, when some of them wanted to come back, Rome said, “There is a richness in these differences. You don’t have to change your Liturgy or your traditions. All you have to do is submit to the Primacy of Peter, and make sure you accept all of the teachings, etc”.
If the OP means that the Latin Rite Catholic dioceses in England should be their own RIte, I just don’t see why. They may have a different culture, but not any more different than a Japanese Latin Rite Catholic, or a German one, or an Italian one. In other words, I see no reason why those differences would necessitate/ call for their own Rite. It would also be confusing with the Ordinariates. The Latin Rite Catholics in England would be their own thing, but the Ordinariates would still be a use in the Latin Rite. That doesn’t make sense to me.
In a nutshell, I can see this question being asked of the Ordinariate. And, it has been asked. The answers I’ve read as to why the Ordinariate shouldn’t be its own Rite have not been convincing, IMO.
