B
brb3
Guest
Was John Hardon, S.J. wrong to oppose the teaching ?
Just want to clarify, the Myer Briggs test is not the Enneagram.When I studied Psychology we took the Myers Briggs test, the professor didn’t actually teach that it was a valid method, just made sure we took it and knew about it.
Most folks said it accurate in some ways and not in others.
Did the Jesuits teach it as my prof did or did the Jesuits teach that it was a valid way of learning about ourselves and others?
Wow …Father Mitch Pacwa, SJ has a good indepth explanation of the Enneagram and why it is wrong. In the article he says that no Jesuit still teaches it.
cfpeople.org/Apologetics/page51a076.html
Instead, it has always existed side by side with Christianity, sometimes taking the shape of a philosophical movement, but more often assuming the characteristics of a religion or a para-religion in distinct, if not declared, conflict with all that is essentially Christian”.(6) An example of this can be seen in the enneagram, the nine-type tool for character analysis, which when used as a means of spiritual growth introduces an ambiguity in the doctrine and the life of the Christian faith.
Myers Briggs test is a learning styles inventory …I took it starting Grad. School…not a personality test.When I studied Psychology we took the Myers Briggs test, the professor didn’t actually teach that it was a valid method, just made sure we took it and knew about it.
Most folks said it accurate in some ways and not in others.
Did the Jesuits teach it as my prof did or did the Jesuits teach that it was a valid way of learning about ourselves and others?
My wife and I participated in a marriage prep program of the Archdiocese of Portland, conducted at office spaces of Providence (Catholic) Hospital. Each and every participant in this program was required to complete the MB battery. Marriage counselors advised participants based on these results.Myers Briggs test is a learning styles inventory …I took it starting Grad. School…not a personality test.