That’s really not the point. It has nothing to do with what people did when we didn’t have these kinds of modern devices. We can joke about it, as my family does, but it isn’t the point. It’s about how we, as a society, uses and deals with the newer technology, whether it is in medicine, science, engineering, etc. There are people who misuse these things, but it doesn’t mean we should live like someone in the 18th century or set our standards to that of a “3rd world” country.
As much as I fantasize about living in the 18th and 19th centuries, (I actually do 18th century reenactments for Revolutionary War - British and American sides - and am a huge history buff with those two centuries as well as the Tudor period) the more I read and learn about history, those weren’t the good old days. When I think about the high level of infant mortality rates and women dying during childbirth (four of my great-great aunts were buried along with their infants due to complications during childbirth), urinary tract infections with no antibiotics to quell the pain or stop it from becoming septic, TB, deaths or other life-long problems that could have been prevented if the doctor had been there sooner, or if they had better medicines, etc., I’m very thankful that we have these modern gadgets, medicines, tools, etc. to help aid in this kind of prevention.
Some parts of history is very appealing - extremely appealing for me - especially with the simplicity of life. Of course people did attend mass without these modern gadgets. People did survive, although life expectancy rates were much lower than it is today. most children died before they reached adulthood.
Most of us certainly do not need to have those things while at mass, because most of us do not have to deal with situations that are life-threatening. I’m in total agreement about that.
BUT Some people do. Of course, we could just ban them for even people who are caregivers of lovedones or are medical professionals. We could tell them, “If your loved-one/patient dies or suffers some severe complication because you are at mass and have no one else to care for them, it’s God’s will.” I wouldn’t want to be the person on the receiving end or the loved one of the ill person who had an emergency. “Sorry, Ms. Such-and-Such, your doctor/the EMTs, etc. couldn’t come right away to help prevent your husband’s death because they were at mass and wouldn’t check their page. It’s God’s will.” In previous centuries, that type of outlook would have been fine, because we didn’t have modern technology to help prevent death, to contact a person quickly or at least lesson the pain. But now we have all that. Why deny the use of it for those kinds of emergencies?