C
Catholicwoman11
Guest
I am making an argument for the papacy to someone and they brought up Eph 2:20 as reason for there being several foundations since the NAB version says “built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets with Christ Jesus himself as the capstone”. The person with whom I am having the disagreement states that this means that Peter was not alone in being the rock, and was not given authority. He states that in Matt 16:18, Jesus is stating that He himself is the rock upon which He will build His church.
I have countered with the fact that later in Matt 16:19, Jesus gives Peter the keys to the kingdom. This is what was done in the Davidic Kingdom (which of course was promised the divine covenant that brought forth Jesus). You can read about this in Isaiah 22:15-24. This authority was given to ONE man, not several. But I am still having issues with how best to explain Eph 2:20.
Any help would be much appreciated.
I have countered with the fact that later in Matt 16:19, Jesus gives Peter the keys to the kingdom. This is what was done in the Davidic Kingdom (which of course was promised the divine covenant that brought forth Jesus). You can read about this in Isaiah 22:15-24. This authority was given to ONE man, not several. But I am still having issues with how best to explain Eph 2:20.
Any help would be much appreciated.