Episcopal Church Ordains Practicing Lesbian as Bishop of Los Angeles...

  • Thread starter Thread starter callmeChris
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

callmeChris

Guest
On May 15 the Episcopal Church ordained a practicing lesbian, Mary Glasspool**(See photo below)**, as bishop of the Los Angeles diocese. Glasspool, 56, has been living with her lesbian partner since 1988. She is the second practicing homosexual to be named a bishop by the Episcopalians. The first was Gene Robinson, appointed in 2003, who also lives with his gay lover. The selection of Robinson created a serious commotion among the Anglicans, leading to a continuing process of rupture. Thousands of Episcopalians and other Anglican groups have left the Communion, and whole dioceses have since applied for admission to the Catholic Church under terms spelled out recently by Pope Benedict XVI. Although the Episcopal Church in the U.S. initially prohibited further appointments of homosexuals as bishops, it relaxed the restriction last year, leading to the announcement of Glasspool’s selection in late 2009.

The Anglican Church of Ireland denounced the appointment, noting that the “elevation to senior church leadership of a person whose lifestyle is contrary to the will of God revealed in Scripture is both wrong and disappointing,” and decried its “deliberate disregard” of the Anglican Communion’s condemnation of homosexual behavior, which was last reaffirmed at the 1998 Lambeth Conference. Representatives of the “Global South,” a confederation of Anglican churches in developing countries, called on the Episcopal Church to express “genuine repentance” for the appointment of Glasspool. David W. Virtue, of the conservative Anglican blog “Virtue Online,” had stronger words regarding the appointment. “The Anglican Communion is fractured beyond repair and it is time to say so,” wrote Virtue on May 10. “Leaderless and rudderless, the Anglican Communion will drift apart, not in formal schism, but like sheets of oil from a broken well head spreading in all directions, some of it dissipating in rough seas, the Anglican Communion provinces will go their own various ways.”
Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, who leads the communion, has denounced the decision to ordain Glasspool as well, and has predicted that the appointment will “raise serious questions” for the whole Anglican Communion.

http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/2009/LIVING/wayoflife/08/03/gay.bishops/art.glasspool.jpg"Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels." Matthew 25:4

PLEASE PRAY FOR THIS LOST SOUL!!!:signofcross:
 
Just like what happened to Sodom and Gomorrah the same thing will happen to America, and any other country that falls into the enslavement of sin and the pleasures of the flesh, and Homosexuality and Lesbianism! REPENT! JESUS IS AROUND THE CORNER!
 
There is already an open thread on this very topic right here in the Non-Catholic Religions forum.
 
PLEASE PRAY FOR THIS LOST SOUL!!!:signofcross:
While you’re doing that I will pray for all the souls who think they know everything so as to judge. And I will pray for all the proclaimed apostolic successors who have sinned and for all who sin and between us that should cover the bases. :rolleyes:
 
The Episcopal Church doesn’t see that their attendance numbers are plummeting, their finances aren’t looking good from suing the pants off their fellow Anglicans, and the future doesn’t look bright. By trying to open themselves up to the ways of the world, they’re only tightening their own noose attendance-wise. And Los Angeles isn’t a really great place for spirituality churchwise anyway. Cardinal Mahoney has been a piece of work as a Catholic leader and his replacement has a passion for protecting illegal immigrants and the amnesty illegal agenda. Episcopal or Catholic I’m glad I’m not in L.A.
 
And the Episcopal church continues its descent to Hell in a hand basket. :rolleyes:

Note that what I just said is not a condemnation of all Episcopalians.
 
And the Episcopal church continues its descent to Hell in a hand basket. :rolleyes:

Note that what I just said is not a condemnation of all Episcopalians.
yes. let us pray for the Conservatives who are fighting this in their communion. that they may bring the wayward ones back. peace to you and yours 🙂
 
Saying “many” is a real reach, in my opinion. “Some” would be more accurate. The vast majority of ‘conservative’ Episcopalians bailed to ACNA. Some remain in Alabama and the South, in Mark Lawrence’s diocese, etc. There aren’t many left. Conservative Episcopalians are an endangered species for sure.
a certain segment of this church has gone astray in a huge way. but not all. many conservative congregations, and people within this communion. we should pray for them, that they be given strength to fight the good fight, and bring the wayward ones back. Peace to you and yours 🙂
 
And the Episcopal church continues its descent to Hell in a hand basket. :rolleyes:

Note that what I just said is not a condemnation of all Episcopalians.
Thank you God Holly :rolleyes: for that piece of information. Might I suggest you be a bit more careful on what churches you condemn to hell based on the actions of their hierarchy. 🤷
 
The Episcopal Church doesn’t see that their attendance numbers are plummeting, their finances aren’t looking good from suing the pants off their fellow Anglicans, and the future doesn’t look bright. By trying to open themselves up to the ways of the world, they’re only tightening their own noose attendance-wise. And Los Angeles isn’t a really great place for spirituality churchwise anyway. Cardinal Mahoney has been a piece of work as a Catholic leader and his replacement has a passion for protecting illegal immigrants and the amnesty illegal agenda. Episcopal or Catholic I’m glad I’m not in L.A.
A local rector tells me very little dissension and no exodus of churches whatsoever in my local diocese of TEC.
 
I think the Episcopal Church will do just fine.

Not one person in my Parish has expressed any displeasure over the past two confirmations of Bishops. In fact, the Parish grew by 21 people last year. Change can be tough to accept, especially if you feel its wrong. Those members who want to switch to Catholicism should do so if they don’t believe in the direction TEC is taking. Its not about numbers; its about those who believe in the church and the direction its taking.
 
I think the Episcopal Church will do just fine.

Not one person in my Parish has expressed any displeasure over the past two confirmations of Bishops. In fact, the Parish grew by 21 people last year. Change can be tough to accept, especially if you feel its wrong. Those members who want to switch to Catholicism should do so if they don’t believe in the direction TEC is taking. Its not about numbers; its about those who believe in the church and the direction its taking.
And while I’m not a member of TEC I suppose one could argue that direction is one of non judgmental tolerance and acceptance with a dash of God’s love tossed in for good measure. Reminds me of their policy of open Communion turning no Trinitarian Christian away who is called to Him. Peace.
 
And while I’m not a member of TEC I suppose one could argue that direction is one of non judgmental tolerance and acceptance with a dash of God’s love tossed in for good measure. Reminds me of their policy of open Communion turning no Trinitarian Christian away who is called to Him. Peace.
nonjudgmental tolerance and acceptance for all but conservatives that is. and one could argue, that they are moving in a direction of appeasing the world and seeking friendship with such. i agree with gamewell CMatt, maybe the the more conservative members should leave this communion. i know the Catholic Church would accept them with open arms. also our liberals could leave the Catholic Church and go to their communion. and practice their open loving tolerant nonjudgmental brand of christianity, that leads to the ruin of many. just read corinthians. next they will be saying incest is ok. how non judgemental should we be my friend?
 
Saying “many” is a real reach, in my opinion. “Some” would be more accurate. The vast majority of ‘conservative’ Episcopalians bailed to ACNA. Some remain in Alabama and the South, in Mark Lawrence’s diocese, etc. There aren’t many left. Conservative Episcopalians are an endangered species for sure.
if this is the case my friend, then they are more than welcome to come join us. perhaps there is a seperation of the wheat and the chaff going on? it is sad to see nonetheless. peace 🙂
 
next they will be saying incest is ok. how non judgemental should we be my friend?
I think that’s a bit extreme on your part and uncalled for. No church or religious organization I know of calls for anything that extreme.
 
I think that’s a bit extreme on your part and uncalled for. No church or religious organization I know of calls for anything that extreme.
you are correct. and 20 years ago they were not calmmering for homosexuals to be running the church either. how about polygamy? would you fight for the right of someone in this lifestyle to occupy a high position in your church? if not, why not? i have debated liberals about these issues before. and following their logic, eventually i can get them to admit they cannot “judge” on these issues. it is a slippery slope. so what is next with this movement?
 
Thank you God Holly :rolleyes: for that piece of information. Might I suggest you be a bit more careful on what churches you condemn to hell based on the actions of their hierarchy. 🤷
First of all, I do not appreciate being called “God Holly”. I was not in any way, shape, or form acting as though I were God. I would never do such a thing. Second of all, I was not condemning the Episcopal church to hell. “Going to hell in a hand basket” is a figure of speech which is just another way of saying that the Episcopal church is headed towards disaster without effort or in great haste. And the fact is, they are headed to disaster in great haste. Also, you must not know me very well at all if you think that I would condemn anyone or especially an entire church to hell. I am not God. I would not dare try to do something that is only appropriate for God to do. I, however, wish to apologize to you if I have offended you somehow (which it seems that I have). It was not my intention to offend. That said, an apology on your part would also be nice.
 
you are correct. and 20 years ago they were not calmmering for homosexuals to be running the church either. how about polygamy? would you fight for the right of someone in this lifestyle to occupy a high position in your church? if not, why not? i have debated liberals about these issues before. and following their logic, eventually i can get them to admit they cannot “judge” on these issues. it is a slippery slope. so what is next with this movement?
Either way I think in this instance you were really off base in suggesting what you did in your original response to my post. No one is-as you put it–clambering to have homosexuals to be running the church; rather we happen to have a few leaders who happen to be homosexual. Its no biggie.

What works for the Episcopal Church may not work for you; it may also be one reason why your not a member of it. It may not work for some Episcopalians and as mentioned in an earlier post here, the Catholic Church has made accommodations for them and likewise TEC is more then happy to have the liberal Catholics join our church (and some have) if they so desire. I don’t think it should be much of a concern for anyone outside of TEC where we are headed in the big picture of things.
 
Either way I think in this instance you were really off base in suggesting what you did in your original response to my post. No one is-as you put it–clambering to have homosexuals to be running the church; rather we happen to have a few leaders who happen to be homosexual. Its no biggie.

What works for the Episcopal Church may not work for you; it may also be one reason why your not a member of it. It may not work for some Episcopalians and as mentioned in an earlier post here, the Catholic Church has made accommodations for them and likewise TEC is more then happy to have the liberal Catholics join our church (and some have) if they so desire. I don’t think it should be much of a concern for anyone outside of TEC where we are headed in the big picture of things.
No, it should not matter at all to Christians outside TEC whether or not that particular church body is placing the immortal souls of its members in danger through heretical teachings,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top