G
GKMotley
Guest
Thought had occurred to me.
But the issue isn’t the same, nor is it even close. The RCC scandal was the cover ups and the bullying to silence and the payoffs at all costs. There is no evidence that happens or happened in the Episcopal Church. That is the difference. Apples and Oranges.Right. Because you can’t belong to a church that has the same issue and say that damages the credibility specifically of the Catholic Church.
Sadly that’s not true.But the issue isn’t the same, nor is it even close. The RCC scandal was the cover ups and the bullying to silence and the payoffs at all costs. There is no evidence that happens or happened in the Episcopal Church. That is the difference. Apples and Oranges.
There are thousands (if not tens of thousands) of threads on here.The real example is in the threads. You just have to look at them for yourself.
I have decided to call posters out when they derail a thread by doing that, repeatedly.
Yes. The Catholic Church is much bigger. It is over a billion people. So it is kind of like asking if the scandals of Rhode Island compare to that of the entire rest of the US. In absolute numbers of course they can’t.You believe anything that has happened in the Episcopal Church rises to the level of the scandals of the RCC? Is that what you really believe?
I indicated I liked one of your above posts regarding dragging the question of homosexuality into a thread that is about who is preaching the sermon at a royal wedding.I have decided to call posters out when they derail a thread by doing that, repeatedly.
And see, in my view, it was a (terrible) departure from the faith, as established by Christ, himself. Whoever has harmed the least of these should be sunk into the bottom of a sea, courtesy of a millstone.To reply that the RCC is guilty of departing from orthodox Christianity, and moral and legal standards, in dealing with and punishing personal actions, as a defense, is likewise a tu quoque retort.
Messed up, hmmm, I don’t quite agree. What the Catholic Church does is a pretty poor job of explaining why it teaches what it does. It has so complicated the issues, that it is no wonder people find the position of the church difficult at the least, and intolerable at the most. And with the current crop of “lets go back to the 50’s” crowd, unfortunately it isn’t going to get much better I’m afraid.… as a Catholic turned agnostic, my opinion is that the Catholic Church is pretty messed up when it comes to its teachings in this arena. Not my circus, but I hate to see the
I don’t disagree that there are extremes. But that is just a reflection of society at large. Our institutions are divided, fundamentally.I’ve made my judgement on what TEC is, and what it may become. From that point on, my main point in discussing it, when I can’t avoid that, is to show that generalizations about Anglicanism are, generally, inaccurate. In a number of dimensions
The authority which enabled the crimes and defied those would speak up to keep silent - was formally defined, however. And defended.a formal, doctrinal deviation (though it involved deviants, to be sure) from orthodox Christianity. It was a crime.
That’s because most CAF posters live in the West, which is saturated with sexual messages and imagery that are in direct conflict with Christian teachings. To say CAF posters are obsessed is like saying Person A brought up a topic and then blaming Person B, C and etc. for talking about it 5 minutes into the conversation.Many posters on CAF are indeed obsessed with all things related to sex.