S
Sam_777
Guest
http://image.moheet.com/images/12/big/127320.jpg
http://image.moheet.com/images/12/big/127322.jpg
guardian.co.uk/world/2010/sep/24/licia-ronzulli-baby-parliament“It was not a political gesture. It was first of all a maternal gesture – that I wanted to stay with my daughter as much as possible, and to remind people that there are women who do not have this opportunity [to bring their children to work], that we should do something to talk about this.”
Interesting opinion. I disagree wholeheartedly.I’d rather that she be at home with her child, frankly, but at least the baby wasn’t in day care.
Héy! Ho"
YUP!If only american employers could be this supportive and understanding of motherhood.
Maybe she enjoys her job.I also believe she should be on the three years parental leave or whatever the duration is in her country.
Good Lord, please tell me she’s kidding.I’d rather that she be at home with her child, frankly, but at least the baby wasn’t in day care.
I don’t know how the EU Parliament operates, but if it’s anything like what either the US or State congressional reps or senators do, this woman is not working Monday thru Friday, 8-5, 50 weeks a year. Likely she is in session for several weeks at a time, several times during the year. I hardly would equate her choosing to do this with choosing to be away from your baby 10 hours a day, 5 days a week! I guess I was a little taken aback by the above comment…here is a wonderful display of a woman that values motherhood and her precious daughter. For all we know, she is in there helping with laws that are family-friendly for moms that either need to or wish to work. Again, if the EU is in session as the US is, I fail to see how this is really different than a mom that attends several week-long conferences during the year or brings her baby to things like La Leche League meetings, MOPS groups, bible studies, or play groups in her church or community on a regular basis.I’d rather that she be at home with her child, frankly, but at least the baby wasn’t in day care.
I don’t think that women who take parental leave are stuck inside their homes 24/7 for 3 years!I also believe she should be on the three years parental leave or whatever the duration is in her country.
And quite frankly, so what if she did choose not to take the full parental leave? That’s up to get and her husband, not anyone else!I don’t think that women who take parental leave are stuck inside their homes 24/7 for 3 years!
If the EU Parliament operates anything like what either the US or State congressional reps or senators do, she is in session for several weeks at a time, several times during the year. I hardly would equate her choosing to do this with refusing to take the parental leave.
I think it’s a tricky issue for many employers.If only american employers could be this supportive and understanding of motherhood.
If only american employers could be this supportive and understanding of motherhood.
:dts:Many American workplaces welcome employees’ pets before they welcome their children.![]()
Anyway, I am lucky that my employer also will let me take my daughter to work (he sometimes has to bring his daughter in too). But it’s really not practical to do often because she gets bored after a while. But when the school is closed for 2-3 days because of snow or something, I bring in my child, my boss brings in his daughter (and another man I work with brings in his daughter) and the three of them have fun.