A
atassina
Guest
What is the distinction between calling the most holy sacrifice of the altar “The Eucharist” or “Most Holy Communion”? What is the distinction between the different labels? Happy parsing.
THE SACRAMENT OF THE EUCHARIST
1322 The holy Eucharist completes Christian initiation. Those who have been raised to the dignity of the royal priesthood by Baptism and configured more deeply to Christ by Confirmation participate with the whole community in the Lord’s own sacrifice by means of the Eucharist.
1323 "At the Last Supper, on the night he was betrayed, our Savior instituted the Eucharistic sacrifice of his Body and Blood. This he did in order to perpetuate the sacrifice of the cross throughout the ages until he should come again, and so to entrust to his beloved Spouse, the Church, a memorial of his death and resurrection: a sacrament of love, a sign of unity, a bond of charity, a Paschal banquet ‘in which Christ is consumed, the mind is filled with grace, and a pledge of future glory is given to us.’"135
vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p2s2c1a3.htm1331 Holy Communion, because by this sacrament we unite ourselves to Christ, who makes us sharers in his Body and Blood to form a single body.151 We also call it: the holy things (ta hagia; sancta)152 - the first meaning of the phrase “communion of saints” in the Apostles’ Creed - the bread of angels, bread from heaven, medicine of immortality,153 viaticum. . .
Good answer. Simple. Clear. Precise. Thanks.Eucharist is the noun, communion is the verb.
According to the English Baltimore Catechism, Holy Eucharist is given as one of the seven sacraments. So I would think First Holy Communion would complete the initiation process per the current Catechism. But then what are subsequent receptions of communion?Therefore, does a seven-year-old make his first Holy Communion or his First Holy Eucharist? And what is the distinction?
I don’t think so - I think even in the case of viaticum, the Eucharist is received as an act of communion with the whole Church, despite the fact that the recipient is unable to be present at mass.So can one receive the Eucharist without receiving sacramental communion?
I’m not aware that Eucharist is ever a verb, and “communion” per se is only a noun. As for the verb forms, a new question: what is the difference between “commune” and “communicate”?However, in the generic sense, the sense in which people usually engage in casual conversation, both terms mean the noun and the verb.
The Eucharist is one of the sacraments of initiation, but since it’s repeatable it’s not limited to that initiation. First Holy Communion gets capitalized because it’s an event with a formal title, not because of anything sacramentally special about it compared with the second Holy Communion, etc.So I would think First Holy Communion would complete the initiation process per the current Catechism. But then what are subsequent receptions of communion?
Maybe we should refrain from using either.I don’t think so - I think even in the case of viaticum, the Eucharist is received as an act of communion with the whole Church, despite the fact that the recipient is unable to be present at mass.I’m not aware that Eucharist is ever a verb, and “communion” per se is only a noun. As for the verb forms, a new question: what is the difference between “commune” and “communicate”?
When previously consecrated hosts are brought to the home-bound, or used in a Communion Service, the recipients may be regarded as being in union with those at the mass where the hosts were consecrated,and through them to the whole Church. For that reason it is desirable, though not essential, that the minister who distributes the hosts have attended the mass at which they were consecrated.I don’t think so - I think even in the case of viaticum, the Eucharist is received as an act of communion with the whole Church, despite the fact that the recipient is unable to be present at mass . . .
He receives the Eucharist by his act of First Holy Communion; if already confirmed, completing his initiation into the faith.Therefore, does a seven-year-old make his first Holy Communion or his First Holy Eucharist? And what is the distinction?
UnderstoodMaybe we should refrain from using either.
commune (v.)
c.1300, “have dealings with,” from O.Fr. comuner “to make common, share” (10c., Mod.Fr. communier), from comun (see common). Meaning “to talk intimately” is late 14c. Related: Communed; communing.
communicate
1520s, “to impart” (information, etc.), from L. communicat-, pp. stem of communicare (see communication). Meaning “to share, transmit” (diseases, etc.) is from 1530s. Related: Communicated; communicating.
communion
late 14c., from O.Fr. comunion “community, communion” (12c.), from L. communionem (nom. communio) “fellowship, mutual participation, a sharing,” used in L.L. ecclesiastical language for “participation in the sacrament,” from communis (see common). Used by Augustine, in belief that the word was derived from com- “with, together” + unus "oneness, union."