Eucharistic Minister training course for hospitals and nursing homes tomorrow

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rasoleil
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Rasoleil

Guest
I’ve been a Lector for two years and Eucharistic Minister for for 10 months now and read in my church bulletin that there is a need for Eucharistic Ministers for hospitals and nursing homes in my archdiocese. Tomorrow there will be a training session at the Archdiocese office. I’ve asked my parish priest months ago for permission to be a EM for those in hospitals and nursing homes, and he gladly gave me his permission, but I never followed up on it because I began to feel wary since I didn’t think I was worthy and worried that I would make mistakes. But luckily my prayers have been answered because of that training course. I am anxiously awaiting to go to the session tomorrow and when I am able to start serving as EM at hospitals and nursing homes. I sincerely feel that it is a calling for me, even though I still feel unworthy. But knowing that I will be serving others in this capacity makes me feel that I have some purpose in life and hope that I can help others in the service of God.
 
This is so wonderful.
All to often, those who are ill are also very isolated.
Visitation ministry is a wonderful way to bring God’s presence to those who need it most.
May God bless you as you embark on this new ministry.
 
I think its supposed to snow tonight, you might want to get up a little earlier.
 
Rarely snows where I live, New Orleans, Louisiana. It snowed last week only 20 miles or so from here, but was too warm, above freezing here. And certainly not tonight. But thanks for the heads up. 😀
 
Thank you! It’s great to have some support. Forgot to add in my original post that a couple weeks ago I had asked one of my fellow EM’s if there was a need for another EM for visitations, & he said “no” and listed all the places & times he made visits & said that I could be used once in awhile if need be. Told me how he had one day off from visitations.That is the reason why I again hesitated on going forward with my plan, as I felt discouraged. I think that it also may be partly jealously. When I asked my priest to be a EM, and asked him if I could still be a lector, he said yes. But when most of the other EM’s and lectors found out about it, they weren’t happy. Some of them came out and told me that I couldn’t do both because they weren’t allowed to. Evidently, some had asked the priest years ago, but he told them no. But nevertheless, it is still at the discretion of the priest, any parish priest. He thought I was up to the task & could handle both, which I am doing fine. But the jealously and anger of my fellow church members really upset me for weeks, & nothing really upsets me. You’d think they’d all be happy that someone like me would be so eager to get involved in church ministry, but apparently I learned it the hard way. And I’m 51, the youngest of the lost, as most are in their 80’s. But when I saw the notice in my church bulletin, it gave me much encouragement. Seems fortuitous that I just happened to come across the notice. And I called the church secretary and asked her if there was a need for visitations, & she gave me a definitive “yes”, esp. at a hospital only a couple miles away and on the bus line. I don’t drive and visitations would be difficult, if not impossible, were not some of the institutions not on or near the bus line. And it also seems that I’m fighting an uphill battle because not only because of the EM I mentioned, evidently not wanting me to make visitations by what he said and his attitude, but because my wife is against me doing visits. I must add that I don’t drive because I have a seizure disorder, but medicines have kept my seizures under control. But I don’t think that it should make me housebound, but my wife insists that I cannot go anywhere unless she drives me. So, when I mentioned EM visitations, she also discouraged me by saying: “If you volunteer for something, that means you’re volunteering me ( meaning her)”. But I don’t see why taking a 10 minute bus ride to an hospital which is in need of EM’s would cause her so much concern. I’m disabled, but not housebound. She may be genuinely worried for me, but much of it has to do with the fact that she is anti-Catholic & lets me know of it frequently. But in my heart and soul I feel that this is a calling, as unworthy as I am, but right now I am very optimistic. She’s out of town right now, & won’t be back home till Thursday. I’m preparing myself to tell her that I not only ventured out of the house, but also went to a EM training course (Where I’ve got to go is only a 10-15 minute bus ride, and boy, she’ll be furious! LOL! Seriously! But I know that she’ll come around someday. Maybe it’s God’s Will that encourages me now.
 
Not to discourage you but make sure your intended travel arrangements are OK before completing training. I think I remember carrying the Lord on a bus being frowned upon.
 
Thanks much for the advice. If you don’t mind me saying something with a little humor and some seriousness as well. Since our Lord entered Jerusalem on a donkey on Palm Sunday, I really don’t think that he’d mind taking a ride on a bus. A bus is a mode of transportation like an automobile, just with a few more people. Seriously though, I’m thinking that one would have to be concerned with carrying the precious body and blood and any safety issues with a busload of people. And I could always take a cab as an alternative if necessary. I’ll have our Lord pay the fare though. Seriously though, the hospital that I mentioned is only a couple or a few miles from where I live, so the cost wouldn’t be prohibitive if I go once week or so. And I seriously what to hear your opinion on why taking a bus is frowned upon. Just a question, and wouldn’t mind hearing constructive criticism .
 
I just love donkeys!

When I was in training to be a Minister of Care, they told us we were to go directly to the hospital. No stopping off anywhere, and no errand running. They did not mention buses because we have no buses where I live. But maybe you could consider what your buses involve: are they quiet and reasonably empty or do they tend to be crowded with people snapping their gum in your ears and using curse words. Sometimes buses get a little rowdy, especially if people are coming from a ball game or something.

I don’t suppose Jesus would mind if He had a bunch of loud, undisciplined people around. He probably faced that a long time ago, too, but out of respect for Him you may consider this carefully.

Since I like donkeys so much, that may be a good plan, too. If you can borrow somebody’s donkey like they did on Palm Sunday. Just make sure you bring the little guy back and you go back, too, when you are finished at the hospital. (Just joking.)
 
Just as a point of information Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion (EMHC) are NOT Eucharistic Ministers. Lay people cannot be Eucharistic Ministers. At Mass the Priest is the Eucharistic Minister.
 
Point taken, but I do :grinning:know the difference between Eucharistic Ministers and Extraordinary Eucharistic Ministers of Holy Communion. I just thought that writing Eucharistic Ministers and EM would take up less space ( there is a character limit on posting) and avoid the repetition of lengthy writing "Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion each and every time that I would write it. I wrote Eucharistic Minister or EM at least 8 times. Imagine the extraordinary ( ahem) length and repetition if I wrote “Extraordinary Eucharistic Ministers of Holy Communion” multiple times and I think it would appear to others that I would be trying to be pompous and holier than thou by using big words. Though my posts were long, and I believe in brevity where it is needed, it so happens that I made that choice here. But I do understand why you’re clarifying the difference. And others who would happen to read my posts would be unintentionally misled by my shorting of the term. Fair enough. But can I call myself a Holy Super Duper Exalted Extraordinary Lay Minister of the Holy Communion? That’s a joke.
 
Fair enough and thanks for the clarification. I thought that you would say that, and I did mention it in my post, but your clarification was indeed helpful. And I was thinking of the alternatives such as getting a ride, taking a taxi, or Uber (never used it yet). I love donkeys too, but not far from where I live is New Orleans and of course we have the French Quarter and the ubiquitous carriage rides that use mules. And mule driven carriages naturally have limited space so it would be better than taking a bus. We do have streetcars in the city, but they don’t go to my area. Streetcars though, would be the same as taking a bus for the reasons you mentioned. Mule driven carriages are transportation, of course, but it’s a tourist thing or for a citizen who just wants to tour the historic areas of the French Quarter. And I don’t think ( joking here) it’s feasible, allowed, and abusive to mules by having them travel 8 miles or so in traffic, including crossing a huge bridge over the Mighty Mississippi River. And mules would make an awful mess along the way and they do their business without control. 😀
 
Last edited:
Just as a point of information Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion (EMHC) are NOT Eucharistic Ministers. Lay people cannot be Eucharistic Ministers. At Mass the Priest is the Eucharistic Minister.
The current colloquial usage of the term “eucharistic minister” uses it to refer to lay people distributing Holy Communion at mass or outside of mass. You’ll see this usage on plenty of Church owned websites and other written material.

I’m sure that there are historic reasons why you are correct, but the meaning of words sometimes changes. and that’s why translation services are such a moving bar. The “gay 1890’s” had nothing to do with homosexuality, the word had a different meaning back in the day.
 
Street cars - I haven’t seen one of those in a long time.

We recently got light rail, which are trains that run along a path of
tracks, but those are in the business district. Of course that would be
quite a long way for your little friend, if you had one. We had a donkey
once on a ranch. He belonged to my daughter and her husband at the time.
They named him Jack.
 
Last edited:
But the jealously and anger of my fellow church members really upset me for weeks, & nothing really upsets me. You’d think they’d all be happy that someone like me would be so eager to get involved in church ministry, but apparently I learned it the hard way.
I am going to be upset about that for weeks, and it didn’t happen to me! 😡

Don’t learn that! Not even the hard way. Their attitude is wrong and you were right! They should all be happy that someone is eager to serve the Lord! It’s not about what you get to do, it’s about God’s will.

That blows my mind!

Thank you for loving the lord and the Sacraments! Maybe, if you can remain kind and open anyway, maybe you can rub off on them a little bit!
 
It looks like I was slightly confused. I was thinking of inappropiate behaviour of other passengers and that it may be seen as disrespectful. I thought I had seen it somewhere but could not find it. Holy Communion must be taken straight to the sick and back. Google transporting the Eucharist. On a phone atm so can’t paste. If your Church is on the same route it likely won’t be a problem. Hope the training is going well.
 
"Augustinian
The current colloquial usage of the term “eucharistic minister” uses it to refer to lay people distributing Holy Communion at mass or outside of mass. You’ll see this usage on plenty of Church owned websites and other written material.

I’m sure that there are historic reasons why you are correct, but the meaning of words sometimes changes. and that’s why translation services are such a moving bar. The “gay 1890’s” had nothing to do with homosexuality, the word had a different meaning back in the day."

Sorry but I don’t agree. EMHC’s were originally called EMHE’s (Extraordinary Ministers of the Holy Eucharist) but the Church put its foot down when lay people started saying they were Eucharistic Ministers. The Church stated they are NOT Eucharistic Ministers. That is why the Church changed the name to Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion. They are not Eucharistic Ministers and people should stop calling them that. The PRIEST is the Eucharistic Minister at Mass.
 
Last edited:
Sorry but I don’t agree. EMHC’s were originally called EMHE’s (Extraordinary Ministers of the Holy Eucharist) but the Church put its foot down when lay people started saying they were Eucharistic Ministers. The Church stated they are NOT Eucharistic Ministers.
The Church didn’t put its foot down here at all, if you’ll take a look at the most recent online bulletin here. Referred to the volunteers who distribute Holy Communion as “Eucharistic Ministers”.

Maybe things are different where you are at than they are here where I am at.

But this isn’t about what lay people are calling themselves, but what the Church is referring to them as.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top