Eucharistic Prayer at Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sbee0
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Sbee0

Guest
I always wondered, do priests choose one of the 4 Eucharistic Prayers to be said at any particular mass or is it defined for that year at that particular mass? Most of the time it’s Euchsristic Prayer II (Lord You are holy indeed the fountain of all holiness…).

Do priests get leeway into which one of the 4 to say or is there a formula for it?
 
They get to pick. Which one they do depends on them. Some always use the second one, some typically use the third and use the first on important solemnities, etc.
 
Last edited:
They pick. My priests almost exclusively say the Roman Canon (number 1).
 
FYI, there are also two more, the Eucharistic Prayers for Reconciliation. A priest in my parish sometimes picks Eucharistic Prayer for Reconciliation I, which is beautiful.
 
Last edited:
And there are priests who ad lib their own versions of the Eucharistic prayers too.
 
You have heard it for yourself (first hand)? I never have. I could be wrong, but my understanding is that priests are not at liberty to do that.
 
Last edited:
I think an important thing for people to realize is just because they don’t recognize the words of the Eucharistic prayer the priest is praying does not mean the priest is making it up. Before anyone complains to the Bishop, please make the effort to do some research. Make sure that he wasn’t using one of the less familiar Eucharistic prayers that doesn’t appear in the books (misselets) commonly used by the people.

I am not saying that the rare priest doesn’t ad lib sometimes (which isn’t allowed), but please make sure that’s what is happening before you start talking to others about it or contacting the Bishop.
 
Last edited:
They are not supposed to but. . . Yes, seriously, until I moved here 5 years ago I had never experienced such a thing either and I would have thought it something that had long since died away. Live and learn, I guess. The priest is a very nice person and he was very polite in explaining that he did this because of wanting to let the Spirit move people, and not be tied to certain words or gestures or expectations. So he’s convinced he is perfectly right and perfectly free to do this. Most of the people in the parish over the last decade have ‘voted with their feet’ so by the time I came in, just about everybody who is there is perfectly fine with the idea.

That’s just the trouble. . . you have people who are being conditioned to believe that anything that "The Spirit’ moves them to is perfectly fine. So what if it’s ‘disobedient’ to what ‘the rules’ say? if we are “easter people” we don’t need RULES, in fact, we should be totally casting them off since they aren’t things which WE have made for ourselves. We need to think for ourselves. Jesus was a rebel. He hated rules and petty things, so we need to move beyond that. . . You can imagine that the sermons are pretty much of that nature. Everything is an encouragement to disobedience to Scripture, law, and anything ‘traditional’ because supposedly the Spirit is always moving us to change.
Women priests? He can’t wait until they’re allowed, etc.

Very tough situation, so far can only pray because, despite my rep here apparently for being a PITA in my rigid super traddydom, I don’t go around mouthing off to a man of God and telling him he’s wrong or whining to the bishop; I just pray. (and whine here where it can’t cause him or others in the parish any problems!)
 
Do priests get leeway into which one of the 4 to say or is there a formula for it?
There are a total of 10 Eucharistic Prayers - see my earlier post in a different thread here (although I just realised upon re-reading it that I missed out one of the Eucharistic Prayers for Use in Masses for Various Needs - “Jesus the Way to the Father”).

Sadly some priests never get past the first three (at that) although, if you’re lucky, one of the EPs for Reconciliation might make a cameo appearance in Lent…
 
We have at least two different EP for Masses with children. I think the total is twelve but I will check tonight.
 
Missing a word or two, possibly but ad libbing, could be lack of consecration.
 
Last edited:
I thought that all that was needed for a valid consecration were the actual words of consecration “this is my body” etc. Adlibing is an abuse, but does not invalidate the Eucharist so long as the actual words of consecration are said.
 
You could be right. This is what we were told once at our parish. One of our priests in the past had some dementia issues and would sometimes mess up the Eucharist prayer and we were told afterward that at many Masses the consecration was probably not valid.
 
Father, what about the ones for children’s masses?
Sorry - you’re right I forgot about those. They should be included even though they’re not in the missal (annoyingly) and are only intended to be used where the congregation is predominantly comprised of children.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top