Evangelical/Protestant/Catholicism, what are the differences?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hashi_Al-Eritre
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
H

Hashi_Al-Eritre

Guest
This post has nothing really to do with Islam, maybe it will in latter posts. Im just looking for a concise explanation on the difference between these 3 christian groups and any other major christian groups, except for mormons and jehovahs witnesses.
 
Hashi Al-Eritre:
This post has nothing really to do with Islam, maybe it will in latter posts. Im just looking for a concise explanation on the difference between these 3 christian groups and any other major christian groups, except for mormons and jehovahs witnesses.
Evangelicals are a group within Protestantism. The evangelical focus is on spreading the gospel, per the great commission and saving as many souls as they can and fouding churches (or strengthening existing ones that they consider to be of compatible doctrine and spirit) to ground new believers and ensure they mature beyond the initial decision for Christ (think of Pauls missions). Doctrine wise, evangelicals treat the bible as the only infallible/inerant authority to appeal to on matters of God’s will and read it literalyly. This is not to say that all evangelicals share identical interpretations, but they all believe the bible is a matter of absolute truth and with prayer and reliance on the Holy Spirit the correct meaning can be discerned. (i.e. many evangelicals intepret ‘day’ in Genesis to be a 24 hour period, but others interpret it to mean ‘age’ or ‘period of time’ seeing as how the Hebrew word can mean either of these things since Ancient Hebrew has a much smaller lexicon than English.) Furthermore in Evangelical Church’s a personal relationship with Christ is considered to be the most important thing, and prayer, group bible study, and daily personal study are strongly encouraged.

As for other Protestants. There are two distinctions (by no means authoritative) that I would make. First between bible believing and Scriptural relativists. Bible believing Protestants share evangelical view of the Scriptures and think that they are the literal will of God and the infallible authority on which matters of doctrine and morality are to be appealed. Scriptural relativists are those churches who believe the bible is fallible, and or irrelevant in many cases to the modern day and that people can decide when this is andthat the laws of God are ok to change inorder to make the bible politically correct. (i.e. churches who permit and even celebrate homosexuality and same sex marriages, justify abortions, and basically edit or rewrite the bible into something they are comfortable with.) The second distinction is between traditional vs. ‘non-traditional’ In traditionalist Protestan churches like Lutheranism the services stylistically are very similar to Catholism, but the doctrine is still Protestant (i.e. Mary is not prayed to as an intercessor between Christ and men, the pope is not regarded as infallible on matters of doctrine and morals, and Sacred Tradition is not considered autoritative) In non-traditional Protestant churches the services are more modern, and there are very few if any trappings of Catholism (i.e. no stain glass windows depicting bible scenes, statues, icons, priestly vestments etc.) The music and worship are usually contemporary in these churches and people dress more casually inorder to foster a spirit of accessibility.

Catholics (from what I have learned) regard Scripture is infallible and inerant as do the bible believing Protestants. However Catholics believe that any teaching done by the pope or bishops in concert with the pope is infallible on matters of doctrinal interpretation and morality. (for instance most Protestants do not teach that the use of non-abortofacient birthcontrol such as condoms is immoral because of the lack of clear scriptural evidence, but Cahtolics do based on a ruling from the pope) Furhtermore Catholics believe that Christ gave Peter this infallible authority and that this authority has been passed on in an unbroken line to the current pope Benedict XVI. Catholics also consider Sacred Tradition (the passed on oral tradition and non-biblical teachings of the early church fathers and their succesors) to be authoritative (I am not sure if it is considered as authoritative as the Bible) and have several books in their bible such as Maccabees that Protestants do not accept. Some of the more unique Catholic traditions are confession, the veneration of the Saints and Mary (they regard Mary as having been born free of original sin and pray to her and the other saints to interceed on their behalf with God). Icons, stain glass windows, and statues are also common fixtures. Most Catholics will tell you that two of their most important beliefs are the Real Prescence (communal bread and wine litrally change into the actual body and blood of Christ when blessed by a priest) in the Eucharist and the necessity of baptism in salvation.

This is a brief summary so feel free to add.
 
Hashi Al-Eritre:
This post has nothing really to do with Islam, maybe it will in latter posts. Im just looking for a concise explanation on the difference between these 3 christian groups and any other major christian groups, except for mormons and jehovahs witnesses.
Major differences…???
  1. The physical presence of Christ
  2. The authority of the Pope (Vicar of Christ)
…the rest is dressing…IMHO

http://mediasoftware.free.fr/index.1.jpg
 
I appreciate your replies. Just wanted to get a general perception of the beliefs within the various christian groups. thanks.
 
40.png
Vincent1560:
(for instance most Protestants do not teach that the use of non-abortofacient birthcontrol such as condoms is immoral because of the lack of clear scriptural evidence, but Cahtolics do based on a ruling from the pope)
I’m afraid that isn’t true. All Christians up to 1930 preached against condoms, until the Anglicans broke off and other Protestants followed suite. There is plenty of biblical support for being against condoms. If you would like the verses, I will quote them, if not then thats cool too:D.

Authority is the big thing. Catholics believe that the Catholic Church is the one founded by Jesus Christ himself, while Protestants believe that Jesus founded no “denomination,” but instead founded all of Christianity.

History goes like this- There is debate as to who the “early church” was. By early church, I mean from St. Paul, to around 312. With the Edict of Milan, Constantine made Christianity acceptable. Protestants believe this is when Catholicism was “founded,” while Catholics believe they can trace their Church to the disciples. The Eastern Orthodox also claim to be the Church Christ founded, and the Church from Jesus to 312.

So what we have is-debate as to Church circa 33-312. Catholics and Orthodox think they’re that “denomination,” I don’t know what Protestants think.

312-1054-Catholics and Orthodox disagree as to “who” was around. Catholics think they were the Church here, and Orthodox believe that it was them. In 1054, the Orthodox broke off the Catholics if you’re Catholic, but if you’re Orthodox, you believe the Catholics broke off of you.

1517-The Protestant Reformation, beginning with Martin Luther, began, based on sola scriptura and sola fide, or the Bible as the only rule of authority, and faith alone saves a person. No one disputes they broke off of the Catholics.

All three have different Bibles, with the Protestants not having seven books Catholics have, and the Eastern Orthodox have all the books Catholics do, and then some.

Eastern Orthodoxy is very close to Catholicisim, while Protestantism is closer to Catholicism than Eastern Orthodoxy.
 
40.png
FuzzyBunny116:
I’m afraid that isn’t true. All Christians up to 1930 preached against condoms, until the Anglicans broke off and other Protestants followed suite. There is plenty of biblical support for being against condoms. If you would like the verses, I will quote them, if not then thats cool too:D.

Authority is the big thing. Catholics believe that the Catholic Church is the one founded by Jesus Christ himself, while Protestants believe that Jesus founded no “denomination,” but instead founded all of Christianity.

History goes like this- There is debate as to who the “early church” was. By early church, I mean from St. Paul, to around 312. With the Edict of Milan, Constantine made Christianity acceptable. Protestants believe this is when Catholicism was “founded,” while Catholics believe they can trace their Church to the disciples. The Eastern Orthodox also claim to be the Church Christ founded, and the Church from Jesus to 312.

So what we have is-debate as to Church circa 33-312. Catholics and Orthodox think they’re that “denomination,” I don’t know what Protestants think.

312-1054-Catholics and Orthodox disagree as to “who” was around. Catholics think they were the Church here, and Orthodox believe that it was them. In 1054, the Orthodox broke off the Catholics if you’re Catholic, but if you’re Orthodox, you believe the Catholics broke off of you.

1517-The Protestant Reformation, beginning with Martin Luther, began, based on sola scriptura and sola fide, or the Bible as the only rule of authority, and faith alone saves a person. No one disputes they broke off of the Catholics.

All three have different Bibles, with the Protestants not having seven books Catholics have, and the Eastern Orthodox have all the books Catholics do, and then some.

Eastern Orthodoxy is very close to Catholicisim, while Protestantism is closer to Catholicism than Eastern Orthodoxy.
This is slightly off topic, but seeing as how it is a difference I guess it applies. Where in scripture do you see a prohibition against (non-abortofacient) birth control? And please don’t cite Onan. The sins he committed were envy, pride, and disobedience to God’s command for him to provide his brother with an heir. The only eay you can come up with a prohibition against birth control from that passage is by adding things to the text that aren’t there. Furthermore I don’t see why Catholics allow NFP but not condoms, both when used correctly have similar rates of pregnancy prevention and condoms have the added bonus of preventing STDs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top