Everyone is sleeping, nobody is in heaven yet

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elzee
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

Elzee

Guest
I heard something recently I never heard before. There are some Christians (the denomination I heard this about was the ‘Church of God’, a charismatic, evangelical church ) that believe no one is in heaven yet. They believe that those who have died and are saved are ‘asleep’ somewhere in a peaceful place. Has anyone ever heard this before? Does anyone know the biblical basis for this belief?
 
A friend of mine in the Church of Christ teaches this.

Notworthy
 
40.png
Elzee:
Does anyone know the biblical basis for this belief?
It is referred to as “Soul Sleep” and proponents of it cite:

Ecclesiastes 9:5 : For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten.

or

Daniel 12:2 : And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.

or

I Thessalonians 4:14-16 : For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him. For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep.

I believe the Bible does not teach this doctrine when these verses and many others supporting souls going directly to heaven are taken in their proper context and looked at together.
 
Cyber Knight:
Does heaven exist?
Yes, when Jesus turned to the good theif Dismas and said “today you will be with me in paradise” 👍
 
Vatican II:
Yes, when Jesus turned to the good theif Dismas and said “today you will be with me in paradise” 👍
Have you ever experienced this?

I know the JW’s have it that way in their bible, even though they do not believe in “souls”, the illustration is the same.

“Truly I tell you today**,** You will be with me in Paradise”

By moving the comma from after the first “you” to follow “today” it changes the whole meaning of the scripture, and thus supports that position.

It should be rendered:

“Truly I tell you**, **Today you will be with me in Paradise”

(using their words) or as in a Catholic Bible:

Amen, I say to you**,** today you will be with me in Paradise" (Luke 23:43
 
40.png
NiceFundamental:
Have you ever experienced this?

I know the JW’s have it that way in their bible, even though they do not believe in “souls”, the illustration is the same.

“Truly I tell you today**,** You will be with me in Paradise”

By moving the comma from after the first “you” to follow “today” it changes the whole meaning of the scripture, and thus supports that position.
With all the mental gymnastics those people do, it’s a wonder they haven’t pulled a muscle!🙂

It might carry more weight if Jesus had used that phrase more often. “I tell you today, I am the bread of life”, or “I tell you today, do this in remembrance of me”.

Notworthy
 
40.png
NotWorthy:
It might carry more weight if Jesus had used that phrase more often. “I tell you today, I am the bread of life”, or “I tell you today, do this in remembrance of me”.
Yes, very well positioned and defended. I myself have used that illustration. I do not believe anywhere else in the scriptures (“else” I say for their sake) does Jesus reiterate that he was “speaking today”.

Well said NotWorthy.
 
It’s taught by Jehovah’s Witnesses, Seventh Day Adventists, Christadelphians, the old Armstrong groups, some Church of Christ, etc.

As was already mentioned, Ecclesiastes 9:5 is used as a supporting verse. BUT - in addition to saying “the dead know not anything”, that verse also says that “…neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten.” A good question to ask people who cite that verse is - do they take that portion of the verse literally? Do they really believe that the dead do not have a reward? That the memory of them is forgotten? If not, why do they insist on taking one part of the verse literally, and the other part not?

The ancient Isrealites were prohibited from communicating with the dead (Leviticus 19:31; 20:6; Deuteronomy 18:11, 12; Leviticus 20:27; 1 Samuel 28:7, 9; 2 Kings 21:6; 2 Chronicles 33:6). Doesn’t that indicate that they believed that communicating with the dead was at least possible?

Some New Testament passages that could be cited to support conscious existence after death: 2 Corinthians 5:6-9, Philippians 1:21-24; 2 Peter 1:13 -14.
 
Cyber Knight:
Does heaven exist?
Yes - but no one can go there until the Rapture occurs (they believe in a mid-tribulation Rapture). Well, now that I think about it, I’m* assuming* this is when they believe believers will go to heaven. I guess I’m not really sure since maybe they believe heaven isn’t opened up until Jesus really, *really *returns to earth - not when he returns for the Rapture. I do know they believe in heaven - I’m just not sure when they think people go there.
 
40.png
Elzee:
I heard something recently I never heard before. There are some Christians (the denomination I heard this about was the ‘Church of God’, a charismatic, evangelical church ) that believe no one is in heaven yet. They believe that those who have died and are saved are ‘asleep’ somewhere in a peaceful place. Has anyone ever heard this before? Does anyone know the biblical basis for this belief?
Elzee: I’m afraid you’ve gotten the wrong Church of God. You’ve probably picked this up from something said by the Church of God, International of Garner Ted Armstrong; or from one of the other breakaway groups of the former Worldwide Church of God of Herbert W. Armstrong. (The Worldwide Church of God itself has experienced a near-miraculous about-face since the death of it’s founder, and has rejected most of or all of it’s Arian notions and peculiar ideas such as soul-sleep). None of these related groups are ‘charismatic’ or Pentecostal in nature and they are widely known as ‘cults’ or heretical groups, NOT as Evangelical Protestants. (Of course, Catholics would accord Evangelical as heresies as well but we will duck that debate here). The Armstrong Churches of God resemble in some ways the Adventists and in others the Jehovah’s Witnesses, including their shared belief in soul-sleep.

The pentecostal Churches of God do NOT believe in soul-sleep and have no relationship to the Armstrongite movement. There are also Churches of God which are holiness-churches that do NOT practice the charsimatic/Pentecostal gifts. Actually there are dozens of denominations known as the ‘Church of God’, usually hyphenated or subtitled to distinguish themselves from other Churches of God. It’s easy to get confused.
40.png
NotWorthy:
A friend of mine in the Church of Christ teaches this.
And, by the way, while a small segment of Church of Christ ministers hold that view privately, the Churches of Christ generally reject the doctrine of soul-sleep. The Churches of Christ are really rather uniform in their basic theology, though they have internal debates over certain things such as King-James-Bible-Onlyism, kitchens inside of (or meals eaten in) Church buildings, how many cups or loaves of bread to use, etcetera. Since Church of Christ pastors have to be ‘called’ and ‘sustained’ by their congregations, I will assume that either your friend is not a pastor, or else they belong to a heterodox congregation that has difficulty being accepted by other Church of Christ congregations. It may well be that the congregation has no affiliation at all with the national denomination known as the Churches of Christ. Again, there are dozens of denominations going by the name ‘Church of Christ’, ‘Disciples of Christ’, or ‘Christian Church’ and not all of these are part of the Campbellite/Restorationist heritage.
 
40.png
flameburns623:
And, by the way, while a small segment of Church of Christ ministers hold that view privately, the Churches of Christ generally reject the doctrine of soul-sleep. The Churches of Christ are really rather uniform in their basic theology, though they have internal debates over certain things such as King-James-Bible-Onlyism, kitchens inside of (or meals eaten in) Church buildings, how many cups or loaves of bread to use, etcetera. Since Church of Christ pastors have to be ‘called’ and ‘sustained’ by their congregations, I will assume that either your friend is not a pastor, or else they belong to a heterodox congregation that has difficulty being accepted by other Church of Christ congregations. It may well be that the congregation has no affiliation at all with the national denomination known as the Churches of Christ. Again, there are dozens of denominations going by the name ‘Church of Christ’, ‘Disciples of Christ’, or ‘Christian Church’ and not all of these are part of the Campbellite/Restorationist heritage.
I’ll ask him. I know he’s given me much information on your friend Campbell. And he’s mentioned a church in the local area that split over whether to use one chalice (of grape juice) or more than one if the size of the Congregation was too large. Wow!

God Bless, and thanks for the update!

Notworthy
 
The problem here is assuming that time is some intrinsic thing to which we are all bound whether we are dead or alive. There are some Christians …] that believe no one is in heaven yet. I wonder: what can the “yet” mean? I would doubt that we can extrapolate our experience of time (which is not constant even in the physical universe) onto “dead” people.

I guess in my bizarro view of reality, I find it perfectly acceptable to… say… pray for the Jews during the holocast. It would seem to some that prayer for individuals experiencing something in the past could not be effective - but I disagree. I wouldn’t doubt that prayer can be seemingly from our point of view “retroactive.”

Given this view of time, I’m not sure what to make of someone who would say that “those who have died and are saved are ‘asleep’ somewhere in a peaceful place.” What do they mean by asleep, somewhere, and place… and most importantly how do they conceive of those people experiencing time? I suppose they are saying that they don’t experience time, but I would argue that they are improperly projecting linear time outside of the physical universe. They come up with a solution (“asleep people”) for a problem that does not exist… but I wouldn’t doubt that there is some way to harmonize such a belief with the truth…
 
Do you ever notice that in the Creed, there is, Life everlasting?

So, if you soul just sleep, how could ever the saints can see the Lord and seek intercession for us on earth?
 
According to the recently deceased Kerry Packer ( a really really wealthy man when alive ) stated when he arrested the first time there is no heaven or hell…that may account for it.

I would not trust such a statement when my immortal soul is in the balance…throw out your Bible if that is the case…because what did Jesus do on resurection but open the gates of heaven to those who had been waiting in Abrahams Bosum for the coming of the Lord
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top