J
Jim_Baur
Guest
I believe (don’t know) that we as believing Christians would benefit from the following ideas.
The evidence that Plato, Aristotle and Aquinas used to point to a divine being should be used as Thomas did.
The evidence was a preamble to faith–that is, it is not part of faith. They are steps before faith and Christian philosophy and theology.
I believe the arguments are even stronger today than 800 to 2300 years ago.
The human reason can now see that we are designed even more so than ever.
The argument from a watch to the new phone add on TV point to design. And we are much more than a phone held in our hand.
We should be accurate in saying, yes there is tons of evidence that we are designed!
We should be accurate in saying, we are intellectual limited.
We cannot discern much about the being(s) that designed us.
We for sure do not know if Moses was accurate.
Moses may or may not had a relationship with the Being. We believe Moses. We believe Jesus. Belief and knowledge are two different realities.
Thanks!
The evidence that Plato, Aristotle and Aquinas used to point to a divine being should be used as Thomas did.
The evidence was a preamble to faith–that is, it is not part of faith. They are steps before faith and Christian philosophy and theology.
I believe the arguments are even stronger today than 800 to 2300 years ago.
The human reason can now see that we are designed even more so than ever.
The argument from a watch to the new phone add on TV point to design. And we are much more than a phone held in our hand.
We should be accurate in saying, yes there is tons of evidence that we are designed!
We should be accurate in saying, we are intellectual limited.
We cannot discern much about the being(s) that designed us.
We for sure do not know if Moses was accurate.
Moses may or may not had a relationship with the Being. We believe Moses. We believe Jesus. Belief and knowledge are two different realities.
Thanks!