M
migurl
Guest
I don’t think it is an official SSPX paper.
The Remnant is just another example of hatefulness of extreemism. Their judgement is clouded by their perception that doctrine has changed. It has not. The only thing that has changed is some disiplines. I have come to the conclusion that:A co worker signed me up for the Remnant, I find it very negative and disrespectful of the Vatican. I don’t think these people take into consideration the state of ones heart or that Christ called us to be united as one Church.
I’ve gotten this paper in the mail before too. More things to fuel the fireplace or paper to let the dog go potty on.The Remnant is just another example of hatefulness of extreemism. Their judgement is clouded by their perception that doctrine has changed. It has not. The only thing that has changed is some disiplines. I have come to the conclusion that:
Both are in the wrong.
- Radical Traditionalist raise disipline to the level of doctrine
- Radical Modernists lower doctine to the level of disipline.
PF

Well, guess what??
Though I didn’t even ORDER a copy,
in yesterday’s mail I received a copy of the BOOK called, EWTN: A Network Gone Wrong by Ferrara. And of course, there was a letter begging for a substantial donation for the book.
Since I never asked them to send me the book in the first place, I am not going to return it, and I am certainly not going to send a donation for it. It came from Nicolas Gruner’s organization.
Jaypeeto4 (aka Jaypeeto3)
Wow - great analysis.The Remnant is just another example of hatefulness of extreemism. Their judgement is clouded by their perception that doctrine has changed. It has not. The only thing that has changed is some disiplines. I have come to the conclusion that:
Both are in the wrong.
- Radical Traditionalist raise disipline to the level of doctrine
- Radical Modernists lower doctine to the level of disipline.
PF