U
UncleBill
Guest
There if no such thing as an ex catholic! Once you are baptized and confirmed you are Catholic for eternity.
Just saying.
Just saying.
As a former Religious Ed teacher myself, I can say that many parents just have their kids show up for the “Communion 1 & 2” classes and then you don’t see them again until “Confirmation 1, 2 & 3 (half year)” Classes. Most of those polled in my class 9th grade classes don’t know even know all the basics of Christianity let alone Catholicism. Yes, they might know Communion is when you eat the Body and Blood of Christ or Confession is when you tell your sins to a priest but when you ask them, “What does that mean? Why do we do that.” It’s blank stares. As a former student, I can pretty much tell you I didn’t learn much from CCD (we just had to take turns reading from a book or get lectured after spending all day at school) and I learned much more from my mom at home and self study. I think the Church as a whole needs to do a better job with our youth and getting them to understand the richness of the Church and all the graces of the Sacraments She possesses. And the why’s, and the graces and beauty of our faith, not just the what’s. Just get excited about it!!I’m curious how they could receive the Catholic Sacraments of Eucharist, Reconciliation and Confirmation without learning and being catechized? And for those who also attended weekly, I would think they also were catechized. Some perhaps even properly. What if there were 2 people. Both catechized in the same classes by the same instructors. 1 remained faithful. The other did not. How could it be said the former was properly catechized but the latter was not? Do Catholics just reject the possibility that even properly catechized persons might simply have had a change in beliefs later in life?
Sort of sad reading your comments. Our faith in Christ is a journey where we are sustained in Word and Sacraments. The Eucharist is not only forgiveness of sins and the promise of salvation but our connection to Christ’s Mystical Body, the Church. I am not sure what you mean that the sacraments “didn’t seem to work”.Because it looked “one, holy, catholic, and apostolic”. And because of the sacraments.
But I found it terribly divided, not any holier than any other church, hardly universal, and apostolic succession didn’t seem so important after reading the NT again and seeing Peter needing correcting by Paul.
As to the sacraments, they didn’t seem to work. If they were effective channels of grace, we should all be a lot holier I’d think. I sure wasn’t.
Hope that doesn’t sound too sharp. Just trying to be honest about it.
But what would you say then? (Of course we could just say “person who isn’t in full communion with Rome but once was”, but that’s awfully wordy isn’t it?)There if no such thing as an ex catholic! Once you are baptized and confirmed you are Catholic for eternity.
Just saying.
The Church teaches they are still Catholic.But what would you say then? (Of course we could just say “person who isn’t in full communion with Rome but once was”, but that’s awfully wordy isn’t it?)
A pretty harsh way of putting it. (As an Orthodox poster said, that’s like saying “You can check out but you can never leave.”)The Church teaches they are still Catholic.
Are you saying that the sacraments did not make an indelible mark on their soul?A pretty harsh way of putting it. (As an Orthodox poster said, that’s like saying “You can check out but you can never leave.”)
I am not.Are you saying that the sacraments did not make an indelible mark on their soul?
In Pius XII’s Mystici Corporis Christi, he writes in paragraph 23, **“For not every sin, however grave it may be, is such as of its own nature to sever a man from the Body of the Church, as does schism or heresy or apostasy.” **There if no such thing as an ex catholic! Once you are baptized and confirmed you are Catholic for eternity.
Just saying.
Did you find this OHCA that has all perfect and holy people in it after leaving the Catholic Church? If so I would like to join you if I can.![]()
After reading a number of your posts, I doubt you would have the proper understanding to commit schism or heresy.In Pius XII’s Mystici Corporis Christi, he writes in paragraph 23, "For not every sin, however grave it may be, is such as of its own nature to sever a man from the Body of the Church, as does schism or heresy or apostasy."
Both schism and heresy can be attributed to those like me who left for another religion, therefore we’re no longer part of the Body of the Church as Pius XII puts it. We’re no longer Catholic. To say otherwise would contradict the encyclical, not to mention free will since it implies being a prisoner of the faith.
From CCC 2089 “Heresy is the obstinate post-baptismal denial of some truth which must be believed with divine and catholic faith, or it is likewise an obstinate doubt concerning the same; … schism is the refusal of submission to the Roman Pontiff or of communion with the members of the Church subject to him.”After reading a number of your posts, I doubt you would have the proper understanding to commit schism or heresy.
I don’t doubt that Pope Pius XII said that, and many other things; I just don’t feel the need to study them.In Pius XII’s Mystici Corporis Christi, he writes in paragraph 23, "For not every sin, however grave it may be, is such as of its own nature to sever a man from the Body of the Church, as does schism or heresy or apostasy."
I don’t think that is possible, yet it is an excuse I’ve heard before.Thanks for your honesty Alizarin!
I see you recognized the importance of the OHCA Church. Did you find this OHCA that has all perfect and holy people in it after leaving the Catholic Church? If so I would like to join you if I can.![]()
Or did they learn the definitions of one, holy, catholic, and apostalic in RCIA.Did you learn in RCIA (I assume you went through RCIA) that the sacraments were there to make us a lot more holy like drinking a glass of elixir?:shrug
I’m curious to know what do you think Holy means?Because it looked “one, holy, catholic, and apostolic”. And because of the sacraments.
But I found it terribly divided, not any holier than any other church, hardly universal, and apostolic succession didn’t seem so important after reading the NT again and seeing Peter needing correcting by Paul.
As to the sacaments, they didn’t seem to work. If they were effective channels of grace, we should all be a lot holier I’d think. I sure wasn’t.
Hope that doesn’t sound too sharp. Just trying to be honest about it.
I’d define it as “engaged in the process of sanctification”. Sanctification is something I would tie strongly to the Great Commandment of loving God and loving neighbor. Therefore, if the church in question is holy, it would be something that noticeably and steadily transforms hearts and minds, redirecting them toward love of God and neighbor.I’m curious to know what do you think Holy means?
Bold mine.I wasn’t looking for a perfect group of people. But **I was looking for signs of a people getting better, so I could get better too. Not perfection mind you, but being made a little more holy, day by day, year by year. Didn’t find that in the Catholic Church. **And no, I don’t see it much in any other church either. But the difference is, with the Catholic Church, it’s advertised as such.