Doc,
I haven’t seen persuasive evidence that this girl was not at risk. I have seen plenty of press report where medical opinion was that she was at risk, which given her age is the more reasonable position.
Again we’re going back to that obstiant position of flying to brazil to personally interview the Doctors? Rather than just believe what they said as published online? And what happens when you do this, and they say “she wasn’t at risk”? You tell them that they’re wrong, because you can’t personally fathom it otherwise (having never even seen this girl personally).
People come out with some really stupid things on this forum - when I have said I’m going to Brazil?
And this exactly what I’m talking about, a position of obstiance more than likely because the facts at hand disagree wtih your personal ideology.
OK, you don’t understand English. Never mind.
The internet also has a lot of information provided by government sources, *such as the ones I provided. *
How about aborted but still alive and then drowned by the doctor?
Hahahahah you are always asking for it, but never accepting it. So I say show me every piece of paper to refute the statement. Show me the doctors examination that says she was in trouble. I want to see you do a little leg work… I want to include you instead of exclude you…
Like statements from the pro-abortion publication California Medicine that said it’s a fact that human life begins at conception.OK, you don’t understand English. Never mind.
Hardline Catholics on this forum claiming to deal in facts? ROTFL!
Fatima Maia, director of the public university hospital where the abortion was performed, said the pregnancy, which was in its 15th week, posed a serious risk to the girl, who weighs 80 pounds.
And?
Show me please. No link… to many fakes out here… Scanned and signed will be acceptable proof…
It’s very difficult to find data on pregnancies in 9 year olds, because guess what? It doesn’t happen very often. You can’t apply data from 10-14 year olds to 9 year olds or even 10 year olds - clearly there is a big difference between the body of a 10 year old and a 14 year old. We know that even for 14 year olds there is typically a 4-5 times increase in maternal mortality compared to 20 year olds (which must be a more appropriate age for comparison than all mothers).
Really…?? Please do a little reading on the couplings of African Pygmies. I do believe that they marry at a very young age and are pretty tiny. I wonder … for those Christians that say it is ok for a 9 -10 year old normal sized girl to have an abortion if they would say it is ok for a Pygmy adult that had sex with a normal sized human to also have one? After all if, IF the only reason is protecting the life of the mother then that abortion is ok too. Matter of fact as long as we are talking about health of the Mother since size does not really matter as indicated by a Pygmy what about the mental health concerns of a smaller mother? What about the mental health of a large women that should matter too. Using the she was too small argument basically defines that that life of the baby is less important then the life of the mother, once you pop that cork the genie is out and you have a hard time defending any life… so according to this logic you can justifiably kill them all and feel good about yourself.
