Exercising Virtue

  • Thread starter Thread starter Psychotheosophy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

Psychotheosophy

Guest
St. Thomas Aquinas states different qualities to exercising a virtue, including:
“Memory is the foundation experience, the knowledge of what usually happens… sense-images are mastered more readily than spiritual ideas.”
“Insight into individual cases to which we apply general principles (such as ‘Do no evil’) when deciding our behavior.”
“Readiness to Learn from the experience of others… since one man alone can’t sufficiently consider all the infinite variety of possible action… (therefore) We should attend to tradition carefully, constantly, and respectfully,…”
“Inventiveness is a sort of shrewd ability to light quickly on the best course to follow.”
“Soundness of Inference is needed to apply general principles to the variety and uncertainty of particular cases.”
Summa Theologica: A Concise Translation
Are these all necessary to exercise virtue?
 
St. Thomas Aquinas states different qualities to exercising a virtue, including:

Are these all necessary to exercise virtue?
One does not have to parse things out…

Human Virtue is increased by repeated acts of the particular virtue…

Patience…becomes a virtue one possess through repeated acts of patience…

Thus a habitus (a stable disposition) is formed…from which one will be able to act with greater ease…

If one has developed the virtue of patience…to act with patience will become a kind of second nature for one…

More on virtue: vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s1c1a7.htm

(of course the infused virtues of Faith, Hope and Charity etc …are initially infused by God…)

also a great source is Josef Pieper (the great Thomist Philosopher…layman and husband and father) “The Four Cardinal Virtues” or “A brief reader of the virtues of the human heart”

ignatiusinsight.com/authors/josefpieper.asp
 
St. Thomas Aquinas states different qualities to exercising a virtue, including:

Are these all necessary to exercise virtue?
Sure…St. Thomas is pretty reliable especially in this area. You have to understand that he is explaining the subtlety of what is going on in the soul in a single act. All those things are pretty much happening all at once or very close together. Just be aware of what he is teaching, practice virtues, and then read that part again in a year- it’ll be more clear.
 
Bookcat, can you expand on the “etc.”?

Thanks,
VC
sure…other virtues can be infused as well…temperance…prudence…(another etc)

these build on the acquired human virtues…

Or they can outstrip these even …for example the infused supernatural prudence of a Saint may not look even not prudent according to human prudence…thus some of the acts of the Saints are very radical…and many can not be imitated…
 
See for example the Three Ages of the Interior Life by Garrigou-Lagrange OP First Vol
 
Given this…
sure…other virtues can be infused as well…temperance…prudence…(another etc)

these build on the acquired human virtues…
Since patience becomes a virtue through repeated good works of patience,
And,
“Love is patient, love is kind,…” (verse?)
And,
Love is an infused virtue,

Then,

Since faith is an infused virtue,

Is this related to “salvation by faith and works?”
 
Given this…

Since patience becomes a virtue through repeated good works of patience,
And,
“Love is patient, love is kind,…” (verse?)
And,
Love is an infused virtue,

Then,

Since faith is an infused virtue,

Is this related to “salvation by faith and works?”
Faith can be taken in various senses…

I will point you here to understand Paul and being justified by faith not works…From Pope Benedict XVI:

vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/audiences/2008/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20081119_en.html

vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/audiences/2008/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20081126_en.html
 
…From Pope Benedict XVI:
“Pope” Benedict XVI, …are you sure?

Peter was chosen by Jesus (16:17-19),
Not by an election,
While among disciples,
Who competed to be the greatest (Matthew 18:1-4).

Jesus overrules any election of a pope.
 
“Pope” Benedict XVI, …are you sure?

Peter was chosen by Jesus (16:17-19),
Not by an election,
While among disciples,
Who competed to be the greatest (Matthew 18:1-4).

Jesus overrules any election of a pope.
Yes. Pope Benedict XVI is the successor of Peter.
 
Yes. Pope Benedict XVI is the successor of Peter.
I’m not sure that you understand my question.

You provided an assertion based on a man.
No man speaks infallibly,
Unless he speaks what is consistent,
With the unchanging principles,
Of the Judeo-Christian tradition.
You seemed to disregard,
This component of virtues…
“Readiness to Learn… We should attend to tradition carefully, constantly, and respectfully,…”

Summa Theologica: A Concise Translation
And,
Yes. Pope Benedict XVI is the successor of Peter.
In the “Catechism of the Catholic Church,”

We can see that,
“Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger”
Is listed as the “Imprimi Potest”
(The man who determines whether the publication is consistent with Church teachings)

However,

No place in the Catechism does it say,
That the Church is only symbolically the “Body of Christ.”

So,

Does this man believe that men = God?
Peter was chosen by Jesus (16:17-19),
Not by an election,
Obviously, elections can be manipulated.
Relying only on elections,
Without God is,
Legalistic,
And lacking,
Credibility.

Certainly if,
Jesus chose a Peter I
In establishing His Church,
Without an election,

He could,
Choose a Peter II
In re-establishing His Church,
Without an election.
 
I’m not sure that you understand my question.

You provided an assertion based on a man.
No man speaks infallibly,
Unless he speaks what is consistent,
With the unchanging principles,
Of the Judeo-Christian tradition.
You seemed to disregard,
This component of virtues…

And,

In the “Catechism of the Catholic Church,”

We can see that,
“Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger”
Is listed as the “Imprimi Potest”
(The man who determines whether the publication is consistent with Church teachings)

However,

No place in the Catechism does it say,
That the Church is only symbolically the “Body of Christ.”

So,

Does this man believe that men = God?

Obviously, elections can be manipulated.
Relying only on elections,
Without God is,
Legalistic,
And lacking,
Credibility.

Certainly if,
Jesus chose a Peter I
In establishing His Church,
Without an election,

He could,
Choose a Peter II
In re-establishing His Church,
Without an election.
He established his Church on Peter and it continues until he comes again at the second coming.

He said the gates of hell would not prevail against the Church…and so they have not.

Pope Benedict XVI is a man of high virtue and theological expertise. And he is Pope by the authority of Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit. His infallibility in the ways that he is infalliable (see the Catechism) is by the Holy Spirit not his personal virtue.

I refer you to Catholic Answers apologetics line where they can get into all this in greater detail.

This thread is about virtues.
 
This thread is about virtues.
Your right.
This is probably not the appropriate place to discuss,
The already silent schism that has taken place in the Catholic Church.
Faith can be taken in various senses…

I will point you here to understand Paul and being justified by faith not works…From Pope Benedict XVI:

vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/audiences/2008/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20081119_en.html

vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/audiences/2008/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20081126_en.html
In one of your references,
Benedict XVI stated,

“The love of Christ makes us, in him, that new creation (cf. 2 Cor 5: 17), which comes to belong to his Mystical Body that is the Church.”
Does this man believe that men = God?
You never answered my question,
I hope your not avoiding it.

Does Benedict XVI believe that the Church is literally the Body of Christ?

Bookcat, you appear to be very well read,
Could give me a quote where he denies this?

Because if we are literally the Body of Christ,
Then according to Benedict XVI,
We make ourselves that new creation.

I’ve known a number of priests who teach this,
As well as,
“God is good and cannot will evil”
Explaining,
“God is good even when he actively does evil”
Therefore,
“God is good and evil.”
sure…other virtues can be infused as well…temperance…prudence…(another etc)

these build on the acquired human virtues…
And so if we make ourselves that new creation,
We infuse our own virtues?
 
Again not this was a thread on virtue.

I refer you to the Catechism of the Catholic Church for all your multiple questions…as to the nature of the Church as the Body of Christ, the office of the Pope…etc.

As to Virtue …no we do not infuse the infused virtues into ourselves…God does.

But we do then live these virtues…
 
I refer you to the Catechism of the Catholic Church for all your multiple questions…as to the nature of the Church as the Body of Christ, the office of the Pope…etc.
You continue to avoid my question.
As to Virtue …no we do not infuse the infused virtues into ourselves…God does.
When you say “we,”
Are you saying that I am not in the Church, the Body of Christ,
But you are?
Do you believe that the Church is literally the Body of Christ?
 
I don’t understand your questions, Psychotheosophy. What’s your contention here?
 
You continue to avoid my question.

When you say “we,”
Are you saying that I am not in the Church, the Body of Christ,
But you are?
Do you believe that the Church is literally the Body of Christ?
I was speaking the “we” of the Church. Those in full communion with the Catholic Church. As well in this case the we that includes other Christians as well who are baptized…

To be real specific.

Again this is a thread on virtue.

But here is the section:

vatican.va/archive/catechism/p123a9p2.htm#II
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top