Expert: Synod Cardinal who supposedly wanted major change in doctrine asserts there is no such intention

  • Thread starter Thread starter CHCL
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
But what would you make of the the Card. Ratzingers 1998 wonderings…

“Admittedly, it cannot be excluded that mistakes occur in marriage cases. In some parts of the Church, well-functioning marriage tribunals still do not exist. Occasionally, such cases last an excessive amount of time. Once in a while they conclude with questionable decisions. Here it seems that the application of epikeia in the internal forum is not automatically excluded from the outset. This is implied in the 1994 letter of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, in which it was stated that new canonical ways of demonstrating nullity should exclude “as far as possible” every divergence from the truth verifiable in the judicial process (cf. n. 9). Some theologians are of the opinion that the faithful ought to adhere strictly even in the internal forum to juridical decisions which they believe to be false. Others maintain that exceptions are possible here in the internal forum, because the juridical forum does not deal with norms of divine law, but rather with norms of ecclesiastical law. This question, however, demands further study and clarification. Admittedly, the conditions for asserting an exception would need to be clarified very precisely, in order to avoid arbitrariness and to safeguard the public character of marriage, removing it from subjective decisions.”

and then as Pope, his 2005 wonderings…

“During the meeting with clergy in the Diocese of Aosta, which took place 25 July 2005, Pope Benedict XVI spoke of this difficult question: “those who were married in the Church for the sake of tradition but were not truly believers, and who later find themselves in a new and invalid marriage and subsequently convert, discover faith and feel excluded from the Sacrament, are in a particularly painful situation. This really is a cause of great suffering and when I was Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, I invited various Bishops’ Conferences and experts to study this problem: a sacrament celebrated without faith. Whether, in fact, a moment of invalidity could be discovered here because the Sacrament was found to be lacking a fundamental dimension, I do not dare to say. I personally thought so, but from the discussions we had I realized that it is a highly complex problem and ought to be studied further. But given these people’s painful plight, it must be studied further”.”

To my understanding, if an orthodox theologian Pope can open the problem to this type of thought and to suggest that it must be studied further… indicates to me that as human beings, with compassion for obvious suffering, we can safely ask the questions of theology with an openness to some answer from the Holy Spirit, whether yay or nay or a new surprise.
This has been discussed elsewhere, but in these Benedict is questioning/discussing the annulment process, internal forum, methods of determining invalidity, etc.

He is not discussing communion for the re-married, which is what is being questioned now .
 
This thread is wandering. Please return to the topic of the original post
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top